HAPBF
Price
$0.06
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Aug 8 closing price
Capitalization
13.06M
WLDS
Price
$1.47
Change
-$0.15 (-9.26%)
Updated
Aug 11, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
3.69M
Interact to see
Advertisement

HAPBF vs WLDS

Header iconHAPBF vs WLDS Comparison
Open Charts HAPBF vs WLDSBanner chart's image
HAPBEE TECHNOLOGIES
Price$0.06
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$31.19K
Capitalization13.06M
Wearable Devices
Price$1.47
Change-$0.15 (-9.26%)
Volume$9.53K
Capitalization3.69M
HAPBF vs WLDS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
HAPBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WLDS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HAPBF vs. WLDS commentary
Aug 12, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HAPBF is a Hold and WLDS is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 12, 2025
Stock price -- (HAPBF: $0.06 vs. WLDS: $1.62)
Brand notoriety: HAPBF and WLDS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Computer Peripherals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HAPBF: 25% vs. WLDS: 11%
Market capitalization -- HAPBF: $13.06M vs. WLDS: $3.69M
HAPBF [@Computer Peripherals] is valued at $13.06M. WLDS’s [@Computer Peripherals] market capitalization is $3.69M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Computer Peripherals] industry ranges from $3.4T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Computer Peripherals] industry is $98.66B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HAPBF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileWLDS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • HAPBF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • WLDS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, WLDS is a better buy in the long-term than HAPBF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HAPBF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WLDS’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HAPBF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • WLDS’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, WLDS is a better buy in the short-term than HAPBF.

Price Growth

HAPBF (@Computer Peripherals) experienced а -14.15% price change this week, while WLDS (@Computer Peripherals) price change was +9.46% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Peripherals industry was +1.52%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.62%, and the average quarterly price growth was +29.62%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Computer Peripherals (+1.52% weekly)

Computer peripherals connect to a computer system to add functionality or to get information from or put information into computers. Think hard disk drive, data storage systems, cloud storage devices, printer and scanner, or mouse, keyboard etc. Some of the major companies operating in the computer peripherals industry include Western Digital Corporation, Seagate Technology PLC, NetApp, Inc., Zebra Technologies Corporation, and Xerox Holdings Corp.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HAPBF($13.1M) has a higher market cap than WLDS($3.69M). HAPBF YTD gains are higher at: 110.333 vs. WLDS (-81.422). HAPBF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -2.84M vs. WLDS (-7.71M). WLDS has more cash in the bank: 3.95M vs. HAPBF (201K). WLDS has less debt than HAPBF: WLDS (1.08M) vs HAPBF (2.41M). HAPBF has higher revenues than WLDS: HAPBF (1.22M) vs WLDS (522K).
HAPBFWLDSHAPBF / WLDS
Capitalization13.1M3.69M355%
EBITDA-2.84M-7.71M37%
Gain YTD110.333-81.422-136%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue1.22M522K234%
Total Cash201K3.95M5%
Total Debt2.41M1.08M222%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HAPBFWLDS
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
82%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
88%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
77%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
84%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
85%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 21 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 19 days ago
80%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
83%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
82%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
HAPBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WLDS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ITP0.21N/A
+1.46%
IT Tech Packaging
GNRC196.252.73
+1.41%
Generac Holdings
WEN10.090.13
+1.31%
Wendy's Company
REPL5.48N/A
N/A
Replimune Group
FUSB13.03-0.09
-0.69%
First US Bancshares

HAPBF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that HAPBF and WLDS have been poorly correlated (+11% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HAPBF and WLDS's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HAPBF
1D Price
Change %
HAPBF100%
N/A
WLDS - HAPBF
11%
Poorly correlated
+4.52%
WTO - HAPBF
-2%
Poorly correlated
-4.35%
VTEPF - HAPBF
-8%
Poorly correlated
-12.90%

WLDS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that WLDS and TBCH have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that WLDS and TBCH's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WLDS
1D Price
Change %
WLDS100%
+4.52%
TBCH - WLDS
20%
Poorly correlated
+8.81%
VUZI - WLDS
20%
Poorly correlated
-1.67%
SONO - WLDS
15%
Poorly correlated
+3.28%
ZEPP - WLDS
9%
Poorly correlated
+2.26%
RIME - WLDS
3%
Poorly correlated
-0.84%
More