HANNF
Price
$0.59
Change
+$0.03 (+5.36%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
72.37M
SMMYY
Price
$7.08
Change
+$0.01 (+0.14%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
7.68B
Interact to see
Advertisement

HANNF vs SMMYY

Header iconHANNF vs SMMYY Comparison
Open Charts HANNF vs SMMYYBanner chart's image
Hannan Metals
Price$0.59
Change+$0.03 (+5.36%)
Volume$25K
Capitalization72.37M
Sumitomo Metal Mining
Price$7.08
Change+$0.01 (+0.14%)
Volume$58.72K
Capitalization7.68B
HANNF vs SMMYY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
HANNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SMMYY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HANNF vs. SMMYY commentary
Sep 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HANNF is a Hold and SMMYY is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 07, 2025
Stock price -- (HANNF: $0.59 vs. SMMYY: $7.08)
Brand notoriety: HANNF and SMMYY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HANNF: 28% vs. SMMYY: 69%
Market capitalization -- HANNF: $72.37M vs. SMMYY: $7.68B
HANNF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $72.37M. SMMYY’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $7.68B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.29B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HANNF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSMMYY’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • HANNF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SMMYY’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, SMMYY is a better buy in the long-term than HANNF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HANNF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SMMYY’s TA Score has 7 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HANNF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • SMMYY’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SMMYY is a better buy in the short-term than HANNF.

Price Growth

HANNF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +11.18% price change this week, while SMMYY (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +4.42% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +4.20%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.25%, and the average quarterly price growth was +55.53%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+4.20% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMMYY($7.68B) has a higher market cap than HANNF($72.4M). SMMYY YTD gains are higher at: 25.088 vs. HANNF (21.361). SMMYY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 204B vs. HANNF (-1.77M). SMMYY has more cash in the bank: 177B vs. HANNF (2.58M). SMMYY has higher revenues than HANNF: SMMYY (1.53T) vs HANNF (0).
HANNFSMMYYHANNF / SMMYY
Capitalization72.4M7.68B1%
EBITDA-1.77M204B-0%
Gain YTD21.36125.08885%
P/E RatioN/A69.87-
Revenue01.53T-
Total Cash2.58M177B0%
Total DebtN/A583B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HANNF vs SMMYY: Fundamental Ratings
HANNF
SMMYY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
65
Fair valued
12
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6994
SMR RATING
1..100
985
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6342
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1004
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8511

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SMMYY's Valuation (12) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HANNF (65). This means that SMMYY’s stock grew somewhat faster than HANNF’s over the last 12 months.

HANNF's Profit vs Risk Rating (69) in the null industry is in the same range as SMMYY (94). This means that HANNF’s stock grew similarly to SMMYY’s over the last 12 months.

SMMYY's SMR Rating (5) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for HANNF (98). This means that SMMYY’s stock grew significantly faster than HANNF’s over the last 12 months.

SMMYY's Price Growth Rating (42) in the null industry is in the same range as HANNF (63). This means that SMMYY’s stock grew similarly to HANNF’s over the last 12 months.

SMMYY's P/E Growth Rating (4) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for HANNF (100). This means that SMMYY’s stock grew significantly faster than HANNF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HANNFSMMYY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
57%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 19 days ago
74%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
HANNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SMMYY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MCH28.250.68
+2.46%
Matthews China Active ETF
MSTY15.620.36
+2.36%
YieldMax MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF
LIAF174.89N/A
N/A
LifeX 2051 Infl-Prt Longevity Inc ETF
NAZ11.82-0.04
-0.31%
Nuveen Arizona Quality Municipal Income Fund
CHW7.25-0.03
-0.41%
Calamos Global Dynamic Income Fund

HANNF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that HANNF and ORRCF have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HANNF and ORRCF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HANNF
1D Price
Change %
HANNF100%
+4.78%
ORRCF - HANNF
23%
Poorly correlated
+1.91%
SMMYY - HANNF
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.14%
GTCDF - HANNF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GRLVF - HANNF
7%
Poorly correlated
+5.13%
GPPRF - HANNF
5%
Poorly correlated
+8.91%
More

SMMYY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SMMYY has been loosely correlated with SOUHY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 39% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SMMYY jumps, then SOUHY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SMMYY
1D Price
Change %
SMMYY100%
+0.14%
SOUHY - SMMYY
39%
Loosely correlated
+0.12%
IVPAF - SMMYY
38%
Loosely correlated
+2.84%
BDNNY - SMMYY
38%
Loosely correlated
+2.34%
GLNCY - SMMYY
36%
Loosely correlated
+0.65%
GLCNF - SMMYY
35%
Loosely correlated
+0.79%
More