HAMRF
Price
$0.06
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
8.81M
MRZLF
Price
$0.28
Change
+$0.02 (+7.69%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
42.59M
Interact to see
Advertisement

HAMRF vs MRZLF

Header iconHAMRF vs MRZLF Comparison
Open Charts HAMRF vs MRZLFBanner chart's image
SILVER HAMMER MNG
Price$0.06
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$5.92K
Capitalization8.81M
Mirasol Resources
Price$0.28
Change+$0.02 (+7.69%)
Volume$3.5K
Capitalization42.59M
HAMRF vs MRZLF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
HAMRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MRZLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HAMRF vs. MRZLF commentary
Jun 30, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HAMRF is a Hold and MRZLF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 30, 2025
Stock price -- (HAMRF: $0.06 vs. MRZLF: $0.28)
Brand notoriety: HAMRF and MRZLF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HAMRF: 8% vs. MRZLF: 32%
Market capitalization -- HAMRF: $8.81M vs. MRZLF: $42.59M
HAMRF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $8.81M. MRZLF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $42.59M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.1B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HAMRF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMRZLF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • HAMRF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MRZLF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, HAMRF is a better buy in the long-term than MRZLF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HAMRF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MRZLF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HAMRF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • MRZLF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MRZLF is a better buy in the short-term than HAMRF.

Price Growth

HAMRF (@Precious Metals) experienced а +19.79% price change this week, while MRZLF (@Precious Metals) price change was +10.49% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +0.06%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.36%, and the average quarterly price growth was +54.26%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+0.06% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MRZLF($42.6M) has a higher market cap than HAMRF($8.81M). HAMRF YTD gains are higher at: 259.375 vs. MRZLF (-15.881). HAMRF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -2.02M vs. MRZLF (-7.34M). MRZLF has more cash in the bank: 4.05M vs. HAMRF (376K). HAMRF has less debt than MRZLF: HAMRF (22K) vs MRZLF (156K). HAMRF (0) and MRZLF (0) have equivalent revenues.
HAMRFMRZLFHAMRF / MRZLF
Capitalization8.81M42.6M21%
EBITDA-2.02M-7.34M27%
Gain YTD259.375-15.881-1,633%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash376K4.05M9%
Total Debt22K156K14%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MRZLF: Fundamental Ratings
MRZLF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
92
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
76
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
60
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HAMRFMRZLF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
80%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
87%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
HAMRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MRZLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CPYYF2.25N/A
N/A
Centrica Plc
MDVT34.49N/A
N/A
Middlebury National Corp.
YUEIF1.50N/A
N/A
Yue Yuen Industrial (Holdings) Ltd
YUMSF1.37N/A
N/A
Demae Can Co Ltd.
FNICF0.03-0.01
-23.96%
Fathom Nickel Inc.

HAMRF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that HAMRF and JGLDF have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HAMRF and JGLDF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HAMRF
1D Price
Change %
HAMRF100%
N/A
JGLDF - HAMRF
22%
Poorly correlated
-13.28%
MRZLF - HAMRF
22%
Poorly correlated
+6.86%
CRNLF - HAMRF
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.92%
MPVDF - HAMRF
11%
Poorly correlated
-8.60%
REDLF - HAMRF
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

MRZLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MRZLF and TEUTF have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MRZLF and TEUTF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MRZLF
1D Price
Change %
MRZLF100%
+6.86%
TEUTF - MRZLF
26%
Poorly correlated
-6.14%
ZCTSF - MRZLF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BYAGF - MRZLF
24%
Poorly correlated
-4.11%
ACRG - MRZLF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ISVLF - MRZLF
22%
Poorly correlated
-4.54%
More