HAL
Price
$21.12
Change
-$0.23 (-1.08%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
18.01B
72 days until earnings call
TS
Price
$35.61
Change
-$0.44 (-1.22%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
18.94B
73 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

HAL vs TS

Header iconHAL vs TS Comparison
Open Charts HAL vs TSBanner chart's image
Halliburton
Price$21.12
Change-$0.23 (-1.08%)
Volume$7.57M
Capitalization18.01B
Tenaris S A
Price$35.61
Change-$0.44 (-1.22%)
Volume$788.13K
Capitalization18.94B
HAL vs TS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
HAL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HAL vs. TS commentary
Aug 17, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HAL is a Hold and TS is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 17, 2025
Stock price -- (HAL: $21.12 vs. TS: $35.61)
Brand notoriety: HAL: Notable vs. TS: Not notable
Both companies represent the Oilfield Services/Equipment industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HAL: 50% vs. TS: 54%
Market capitalization -- HAL: $18.01B vs. TS: $18.94B
HAL [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] is valued at $18.01B. TS’s [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] market capitalization is $18.94B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] industry ranges from $49.21B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] industry is $3.04B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HAL’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileTS’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • HAL’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • TS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, TS is a better buy in the long-term than HAL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HAL’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TS’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HAL’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • TS’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, TS is a better buy in the short-term than HAL.

Price Growth

HAL (@Oilfield Services/Equipment) experienced а +1.05% price change this week, while TS (@Oilfield Services/Equipment) price change was -0.39% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oilfield Services/Equipment industry was -0.68%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.29%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.06%.

Reported Earning Dates

HAL is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2025.

TS is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oilfield Services/Equipment (-0.68% weekly)

The oilfield services/equipment industry is involved in providing various equipment and services to oil and natural gas producers. These companies rent drilling rigs and/or provide services to build and maintain oil and gas wells. The performance of this industry is dependent on demand for oil and natural gas, which in turn is often driven by macroeconomic conditions or business cycles. Schlumberger NV, Halliburton Company, and Baker Hughes are some of the biggest oilfield services companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TS($18.9B) and HAL($18B) have the same market capitalization . HAL (9.92) and TS (9.62) have similar P/E ratio . TS YTD gains are higher at: -2.570 vs. HAL (-21.117). HAL has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 3.99B vs. TS (3.08B). TS has more cash in the bank: 3.06B vs. HAL (2.04B). TS has less debt than HAL: TS (472M) vs HAL (8.56B). HAL has higher revenues than TS: HAL (22.2B) vs TS (11.8B).
HALTSHAL / TS
Capitalization18B18.9B95%
EBITDA3.99B3.08B129%
Gain YTD-21.117-2.570822%
P/E Ratio9.929.62103%
Revenue22.2B11.8B188%
Total Cash2.04B3.06B67%
Total Debt8.56B472M1,814%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HAL vs TS: Fundamental Ratings
HAL
TS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
177
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
85
Overvalued
49
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
7217
SMR RATING
1..100
4962
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6254
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5713
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
7550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TS's Valuation (49) in the Steel industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HAL (85) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry. This means that TS’s stock grew somewhat faster than HAL’s over the last 12 months.

TS's Profit vs Risk Rating (17) in the Steel industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HAL (72) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry. This means that TS’s stock grew somewhat faster than HAL’s over the last 12 months.

HAL's SMR Rating (49) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry is in the same range as TS (62) in the Steel industry. This means that HAL’s stock grew similarly to TS’s over the last 12 months.

TS's Price Growth Rating (54) in the Steel industry is in the same range as HAL (62) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry. This means that TS’s stock grew similarly to HAL’s over the last 12 months.

TS's P/E Growth Rating (13) in the Steel industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HAL (57) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry. This means that TS’s stock grew somewhat faster than HAL’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HALTS
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
71%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
56%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
71%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
66%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
65%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
57%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
HAL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GMOI31.070.21
+0.68%
GMO International Value ETF
FLEE34.370.08
+0.23%
Franklin FTSE Europe ETF
MEMS26.250.03
+0.11%
Matthews Emerging Markets Discv Actv ETF
CGBL33.91-0.12
-0.35%
Capital Group Core Balanced ETF
NQP10.89-0.04
-0.37%
Nuveen Pennsylvania Quality Municipal Income Fund

HAL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HAL has been closely correlated with SLB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HAL jumps, then SLB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HAL
1D Price
Change %
HAL100%
-1.08%
SLB - HAL
87%
Closely correlated
-0.69%
CHX - HAL
86%
Closely correlated
N/A
NOV - HAL
82%
Closely correlated
-1.30%
RES - HAL
81%
Closely correlated
-1.13%
OII - HAL
81%
Closely correlated
+0.18%
More

TS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TS has been closely correlated with SLB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TS jumps, then SLB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TS
1D Price
Change %
TS100%
-1.22%
SLB - TS
68%
Closely correlated
-0.69%
BKR - TS
67%
Closely correlated
-1.04%
HAL - TS
66%
Closely correlated
-1.08%
WFRD - TS
65%
Loosely correlated
-2.11%
CHX - TS
65%
Loosely correlated
N/A
More