HAL
Price
$34.22
Change
+$0.35 (+1.03%)
Updated
Feb 4, 02:48 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
28.51B
83 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
LB
Price
$53.74
Change
-$0.38 (-0.70%)
Updated
Feb 4, 02:53 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.51B
21 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

HAL vs LB

Header iconHAL vs LB Comparison
Open Charts HAL vs LBBanner chart's image
Halliburton
Price$34.22
Change+$0.35 (+1.03%)
Volume$4.48K
Capitalization28.51B
LandBridge
Price$53.74
Change-$0.38 (-0.70%)
Volume$100
Capitalization1.51B
HAL vs LB Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HAL vs. LB commentary
Feb 04, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HAL is a Buy and LB is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 04, 2026
Stock price -- (HAL: $33.87 vs. LB: $54.12)
Brand notoriety: HAL: Notable vs. LB: Not notable
Both companies represent the Oilfield Services/Equipment industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HAL: 84% vs. LB: 116%
Market capitalization -- HAL: $28.51B vs. LB: $1.51B
HAL [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] is valued at $28.51B. LB’s [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] market capitalization is $1.51B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] industry ranges from $74.41B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] industry is $4.05B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HAL’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileLB’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • HAL’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • LB’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, HAL is a better buy in the long-term than LB.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HAL’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LB’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HAL’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • LB’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both HAL and LB are a bad buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

HAL (@Oilfield Services/Equipment) experienced а -1.14% price change this week, while LB (@Oilfield Services/Equipment) price change was -4.08% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oilfield Services/Equipment industry was +1.42%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.95%, and the average quarterly price growth was +31.18%.

Reported Earning Dates

HAL is expected to report earnings on Apr 28, 2026.

LB is expected to report earnings on Feb 25, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oilfield Services/Equipment (+1.42% weekly)

The oilfield services/equipment industry is involved in providing various equipment and services to oil and natural gas producers. These companies rent drilling rigs and/or provide services to build and maintain oil and gas wells. The performance of this industry is dependent on demand for oil and natural gas, which in turn is often driven by macroeconomic conditions or business cycles. Schlumberger NV, Halliburton Company, and Baker Hughes are some of the biggest oilfield services companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HAL($28.5B) has a higher market cap than LB($1.51B). LB has higher P/E ratio than HAL: LB (61.33) vs HAL (22.58). HAL YTD gains are higher at: 19.851 vs. LB (10.472). HAL has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 3.49B vs. LB (112M). HAL has more cash in the bank: 2.03B vs. LB (28.3M). LB has less debt than HAL: LB (367M) vs HAL (8.57B). HAL has higher revenues than LB: HAL (22.1B) vs LB (179M).
HALLBHAL / LB
Capitalization28.5B1.51B1,891%
EBITDA3.49B112M3,117%
Gain YTD19.85110.472190%
P/E Ratio22.5861.3337%
Revenue22.1B179M12,346%
Total Cash2.03B28.3M7,159%
Total Debt8.57B367M2,334%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HAL: Fundamental Ratings
HAL
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
17
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
90
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
61
SMR RATING
1..100
60
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HALLB
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
90%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
HAL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
LB
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
KNG51.560.17
+0.33%
FT Cboe Vest S&P 500® Dv Ast Tgt Inc ETF
BLCV38.830.02
+0.05%
iShares Large Cap Value Active ETF
SPBX27.70-0.13
-0.47%
AllianzIM 6 Month Buffer10 Allocation ETF
HAPI41.29-0.44
-1.05%
Harbor Human Capital Factor US LrgCapETF
PSWD31.82-1.28
-3.86%
Xtrackers Cybersecurity Select Eq ETF

HAL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HAL has been closely correlated with SLB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HAL jumps, then SLB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HAL
1D Price
Change %
HAL100%
+3.17%
SLB - HAL
86%
Closely correlated
+3.56%
WFRD - HAL
79%
Closely correlated
+3.90%
NOV - HAL
78%
Closely correlated
+2.12%
RES - HAL
74%
Closely correlated
-17.37%
WHD - HAL
72%
Closely correlated
+1.00%
More

LB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LB has been loosely correlated with NOV. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LB jumps, then NOV could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LB
1D Price
Change %
LB100%
-0.33%
NOV - LB
47%
Loosely correlated
+2.12%
AROC - LB
46%
Loosely correlated
+1.12%
OIS - LB
46%
Loosely correlated
+4.72%
BKR - LB
45%
Loosely correlated
+2.75%
HAL - LB
45%
Loosely correlated
+3.17%
More