HAIVF
Price
$3.88
Change
+$0.48 (+14.12%)
Updated
Jul 2 closing price
Capitalization
83.09M
IFBD
Price
$1.05
Change
-$0.03 (-2.78%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
5.75M
Interact to see
Advertisement

HAIVF vs IFBD

Header iconHAIVF vs IFBD Comparison
Open Charts HAIVF vs IFBDBanner chart's image
HAIVISION SYS
Price$3.88
Change+$0.48 (+14.12%)
Volume$11.61K
Capitalization83.09M
Infobird
Price$1.05
Change-$0.03 (-2.78%)
Volume$10.59K
Capitalization5.75M
HAIVF vs IFBD Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
HAIVF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
IFBD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HAIVF vs. IFBD commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HAIVF is a Hold and IFBD is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (HAIVF: $3.88 vs. IFBD: $1.05)
Brand notoriety: HAIVF and IFBD are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HAIVF: 214% vs. IFBD: 21%
Market capitalization -- HAIVF: $83.09M vs. IFBD: $5.75M
HAIVF [@Packaged Software] is valued at $83.09M. IFBD’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $5.75M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $3.15T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $12.78B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HAIVF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileIFBD’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • HAIVF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • IFBD’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, HAIVF is a better buy in the long-term than IFBD.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HAIVF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while IFBD’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HAIVF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • IFBD’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HAIVF is a better buy in the short-term than IFBD.

Price Growth

HAIVF (@Packaged Software) experienced а +13.09% price change this week, while IFBD (@Packaged Software) price change was -2.33% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +2.24%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.54%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.02%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (+2.24% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HAIVF($83.1M) has a higher market cap than IFBD($5.75M). HAIVF has higher P/E ratio than IFBD: HAIVF (44.44) vs IFBD (6.69). HAIVF YTD gains are higher at: 8.683 vs. IFBD (-53.540). HAIVF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 3.39M vs. IFBD (-14.72M). HAIVF has more cash in the bank: 7.3M vs. IFBD (3.39K). IFBD has less debt than HAIVF: IFBD (3.62M) vs HAIVF (22.6M). HAIVF has higher revenues than IFBD: HAIVF (137M) vs IFBD (5.51M).
HAIVFIFBDHAIVF / IFBD
Capitalization83.1M5.75M1,446%
EBITDA3.39M-14.72M-23%
Gain YTD8.683-53.540-16%
P/E Ratio44.446.69664%
Revenue137M5.51M2,488%
Total Cash7.3M3.39K215,192%
Total Debt22.6M3.62M625%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HAIVFIFBD
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
82%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
74%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
89%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
81%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
42%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
HAIVF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
IFBD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NFEAX17.290.24
+1.41%
Columbia Large Cap Growth Opp A
LFGFX39.980.54
+1.37%
Lord Abbett Focused Growth F
RREMX15.450.10
+0.65%
RBC Emerging Markets Equity R6
GLECX13.78-0.02
-0.14%
GS Energy Infrastructure Fd C Shares
LTUM0.05N/A
-0.65%
Lithium Corporation.

HAIVF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that HAIVF and RMDEF have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HAIVF and RMDEF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HAIVF
1D Price
Change %
HAIVF100%
N/A
RMDEF - HAIVF
32%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TMICY - HAIVF
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.45%
ROIUF - HAIVF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IFBD - HAIVF
18%
Poorly correlated
-2.78%
KARO - HAIVF
14%
Poorly correlated
+2.74%
More

IFBD and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that IFBD and FNCHF have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that IFBD and FNCHF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IFBD
1D Price
Change %
IFBD100%
-2.78%
FNCHF - IFBD
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TMNSF - IFBD
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NXTT - IFBD
25%
Poorly correlated
+2.02%
PSFE - IFBD
25%
Poorly correlated
+2.36%
OLO - IFBD
24%
Poorly correlated
+13.58%
More