HAIAF
Price
$12.60
Change
+$0.06 (+0.48%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
69.84M
TLGYF
Price
$13.00
Change
+$0.92 (+7.62%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
77.21M
Interact to see
Advertisement

HAIAF vs TLGYF

Header iconHAIAF vs TLGYF Comparison
Open Charts HAIAF vs TLGYFBanner chart's image
Healthcare AI Acquisition
Price$12.60
Change+$0.06 (+0.48%)
Volume$1K
Capitalization69.84M
TLGY Acquisition
Price$13.00
Change+$0.92 (+7.62%)
Volume$3.73K
Capitalization77.21M
HAIAF vs TLGYF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
HAIAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TLGYF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HAIAF vs. TLGYF commentary
Sep 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HAIAF is a Hold and TLGYF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 29, 2025
Stock price -- (HAIAF: $12.60 vs. TLGYF: $13.00)
Brand notoriety: HAIAF and TLGYF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Financial Conglomerates industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HAIAF: 166% vs. TLGYF: 85%
Market capitalization -- HAIAF: $69.84M vs. TLGYF: $77.21M
HAIAF [@Financial Conglomerates] is valued at $69.84M. TLGYF’s [@Financial Conglomerates] market capitalization is $77.21M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry ranges from $590.24B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry is $174.23M.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HAIAF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTLGYF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • HAIAF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • TLGYF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, HAIAF is a better buy in the long-term than TLGYF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HAIAF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TLGYF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HAIAF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • TLGYF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HAIAF is a better buy in the short-term than TLGYF.

Price Growth

HAIAF (@Financial Conglomerates) experienced а +0.88% price change this week, while TLGYF (@Financial Conglomerates) price change was -2.62% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was +0.64%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.06%, and the average quarterly price growth was +16.88%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Financial Conglomerates (+0.64% weekly)

Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TLGYF($77.2M) has a higher market cap than HAIAF($69.8M). HAIAF has higher P/E ratio than TLGYF: HAIAF (157.50) vs TLGYF (76.67). TLGYF YTD gains are higher at: 11.684 vs. HAIAF (10.236). HAIAF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -659.11K vs. TLGYF (-898K). TLGYF has more cash in the bank: 208K vs. HAIAF (212). HAIAF has less debt than TLGYF: HAIAF (1.28M) vs TLGYF (4.87M). HAIAF (0) and TLGYF (0) have equivalent revenues.
HAIAFTLGYFHAIAF / TLGYF
Capitalization69.8M77.2M90%
EBITDA-659.11K-898K73%
Gain YTD10.23611.68488%
P/E Ratio157.5076.67205%
Revenue00-
Total Cash212208K0%
Total Debt1.28M4.87M26%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HAIAFTLGYF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
2%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
29%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
24%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
22%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
6%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
17%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
16%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
16%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
32%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
16%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
6%
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
32%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
43%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
HAIAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TLGYF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GXSBY0.36N/A
N/A
Geox Spa Biadene di Montebelluna Tv
ISMAY23.21N/A
N/A
Indra Sistemas SA
PCFBF0.27N/A
N/A
Pacific Basin Shipping Ltd.
CTYP6.50N/A
N/A
Community Bankers (PA)
SMFNF27.52-0.54
-1.92%
Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group Inc.

HAIAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that HAIAF and PLAOF have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HAIAF and PLAOF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HAIAF
1D Price
Change %
HAIAF100%
+0.48%
PLAOF - HAIAF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ADCV - HAIAF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PORT - HAIAF
19%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ALSAF - HAIAF
12%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TLGYF - HAIAF
5%
Poorly correlated
+7.62%
More

TLGYF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TLGYF has been loosely correlated with HYAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 40% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TLGYF jumps, then HYAC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TLGYF
1D Price
Change %
TLGYF100%
+7.62%
HYAC - TLGYF
40%
Loosely correlated
N/A
ILXP - TLGYF
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
OAKU - TLGYF
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.41%
RRACF - TLGYF
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HAIAF - TLGYF
5%
Poorly correlated
+0.48%
More