HAIAF
Price
$11.73
Change
+$0.01 (+0.09%)
Updated
Jul 1 closing price
Capitalization
59.13M
PORT
Price
$11.60
Change
-$0.23 (-1.94%)
Updated
Jul 1 closing price
Capitalization
75.08M
Interact to see
Advertisement

HAIAF vs PORT

Header iconHAIAF vs PORT Comparison
Open Charts HAIAF vs PORTBanner chart's image
Healthcare AI Acquisition
Price$11.73
Change+$0.01 (+0.09%)
Volume$100
Capitalization59.13M
Southport Acquisition
Price$11.60
Change-$0.23 (-1.94%)
Volume$1.38K
Capitalization75.08M
HAIAF vs PORT Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
HAIAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PORT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HAIAF vs. PORT commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HAIAF is a Buy and PORT is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (HAIAF: $11.73 vs. PORT: $11.60)
Brand notoriety: HAIAF and PORT are both not notable
Both companies represent the Financial Conglomerates industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HAIAF: 40% vs. PORT: 19%
Market capitalization -- HAIAF: $59.13M vs. PORT: $75.08M
HAIAF [@Financial Conglomerates] is valued at $59.13M. PORT’s [@Financial Conglomerates] market capitalization is $75.08M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry ranges from $590.24B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry is $4.46B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HAIAF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePORT’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • HAIAF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • PORT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, HAIAF is a better buy in the long-term than PORT.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HAIAF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PORT’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HAIAF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • PORT’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 1 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both HAIAF and PORT are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

HAIAF (@Financial Conglomerates) experienced а +0.08% price change this week, while PORT (@Financial Conglomerates) price change was -1.94% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was -1.44%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.57%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.49%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Financial Conglomerates (-1.44% weekly)

Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PORT($75.1M) has a higher market cap than HAIAF($59.1M). PORT has higher P/E ratio than HAIAF: PORT (39.96) vs HAIAF (31.34). PORT YTD gains are higher at: 4.129 vs. HAIAF (2.624). HAIAF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -1.24M vs. PORT (-12.02M). PORT has more cash in the bank: 2.35M vs. HAIAF (212). PORT has less debt than HAIAF: PORT (60.2K) vs HAIAF (216K). HAIAF (0) and PORT (0) have equivalent revenues.
HAIAFPORTHAIAF / PORT
Capitalization59.1M75.1M79%
EBITDA-1.24M-12.02M10%
Gain YTD2.6244.12964%
P/E Ratio31.3439.9678%
Revenue00-
Total Cash2122.35M0%
Total Debt216K60.2K359%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HAIAFPORT
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
5%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
3%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
17%
N/A
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
17%
N/A
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
17%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
HAIAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PORT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SIEGY130.160.56
+0.43%
Siemens AG
IRCKF0.55N/A
N/A
Inter-Rock Minerals, Inc.
BRRLY11.48-0.32
-2.75%
Barry Callebaut AG
EUTLF4.02-0.13
-3.13%
Eutelsat Communications
LTMCF0.47-0.02
-3.60%
Lithium Chile Inc.

HAIAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that HAIAF and ADCV have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HAIAF and ADCV's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HAIAF
1D Price
Change %
HAIAF100%
N/A
ADCV - HAIAF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PORT - HAIAF
19%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EMCGU - HAIAF
14%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ALSAF - HAIAF
12%
Poorly correlated
N/A
VOYA - HAIAF
7%
Poorly correlated
+0.54%
More

PORT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PORT and CSTUF have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PORT and CSTUF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PORT
1D Price
Change %
PORT100%
N/A
CSTUF - PORT
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HAIAF - PORT
-8%
Poorly correlated
N/A