HAFG
Price
$0.65
Change
+$0.14 (+27.45%)
Updated
Jun 30 closing price
Capitalization
282.03K
TMXXF
Price
$41.23
Change
+$0.12 (+0.29%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
7.09B
Interact to see
Advertisement

HAFG vs TMXXF

Header iconHAFG vs TMXXF Comparison
Open Charts HAFG vs TMXXFBanner chart's image
Holistic Asset Finance Group
Price$0.65
Change+$0.14 (+27.45%)
Volume$100
Capitalization282.03K
TMX Group
Price$41.23
Change+$0.12 (+0.29%)
Volume$485
Capitalization7.09B
HAFG vs TMXXF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
HAFG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TMXXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HAFG vs. TMXXF commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HAFG is a Hold and TMXXF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (HAFG: $0.65 vs. TMXXF: $41.23)
Brand notoriety: HAFG and TMXXF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HAFG: 6% vs. TMXXF: 8%
Market capitalization -- HAFG: $282.03K vs. TMXXF: $7.09B
HAFG [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $282.03K. TMXXF’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $7.09B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $12.11B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HAFG’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileTMXXF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • HAFG’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • TMXXF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, TMXXF is a better buy in the long-term than HAFG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HAFG’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TMXXF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HAFG’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • TMXXF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, TMXXF is a better buy in the short-term than HAFG.

Price Growth

HAFG (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а -13.68% price change this week, while TMXXF (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was -1.08% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was +24.10%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +14.99%, and the average quarterly price growth was +112.48%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (+24.10% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TMXXF($7.09B) has a higher market cap than HAFG($282K). TMXXF YTD gains are higher at: 33.560 vs. HAFG (-13.655). TMXXF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.24B vs. HAFG (-1.93M). TMXXF has more cash in the bank: 654M vs. HAFG (97.8K). HAFG has less debt than TMXXF: HAFG (432K) vs TMXXF (1.39B). TMXXF has higher revenues than HAFG: TMXXF (1.17B) vs HAFG (11.1M).
HAFGTMXXFHAFG / TMXXF
Capitalization282K7.09B0%
EBITDA-1.93M2.24B-0%
Gain YTD-13.65533.560-41%
P/E RatioN/A27.17-
Revenue11.1M1.17B1%
Total Cash97.8K654M0%
Total Debt432K1.39B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HAFG vs TMXXF: Fundamental Ratings
HAFG
TMXXF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
52
Fair valued
46
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1004
SMR RATING
1..100
9869
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
9244
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10023
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TMXXF's Valuation (46) in the null industry is in the same range as HAFG (52). This means that TMXXF’s stock grew similarly to HAFG’s over the last 12 months.

TMXXF's Profit vs Risk Rating (4) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for HAFG (100). This means that TMXXF’s stock grew significantly faster than HAFG’s over the last 12 months.

TMXXF's SMR Rating (69) in the null industry is in the same range as HAFG (98). This means that TMXXF’s stock grew similarly to HAFG’s over the last 12 months.

TMXXF's Price Growth Rating (44) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HAFG (92). This means that TMXXF’s stock grew somewhat faster than HAFG’s over the last 12 months.

TMXXF's P/E Growth Rating (23) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for HAFG (100). This means that TMXXF’s stock grew significantly faster than HAFG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HAFGTMXXF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
48%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
34%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
32%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
35%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
34%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
30%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
42%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
47%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
64%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
42%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
HAFG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TMXXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CMBT9.610.18
+1.91%
CMB.TECH NV
BMRA3.270.04
+1.24%
Biomerica
RELL10.220.05
+0.49%
Richardson Electronics Ltd
HZO27.780.09
+0.33%
MarineMax
SBAC233.93-3.66
-1.54%
SBA Communications Corp

HAFG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that HAFG and CIIHF have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HAFG and CIIHF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HAFG
1D Price
Change %
HAFG100%
N/A
CIIHF - HAFG
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TMXXF - HAFG
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.29%
DBOEY - HAFG
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.48%
HEXEY - HAFG
14%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PHIG - HAFG
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

TMXXF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that TMXXF and TVAVF have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TMXXF and TVAVF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TMXXF
1D Price
Change %
TMXXF100%
+0.29%
TVAVF - TMXXF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NDAQ - TMXXF
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.61%
JEF - TMXXF
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.57%
HAFG - TMXXF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EVR - TMXXF
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.68%
More