HAFC
Price
$28.19
Change
+$0.05 (+0.18%)
Updated
Dec 4, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
842.94M
54 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
MBINN
Price
$18.97
Change
-$0.20 (-1.04%)
Updated
Dec 4, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
N/A
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

HAFC vs MBINN

Header iconHAFC vs MBINN Comparison
Open Charts HAFC vs MBINNBanner chart's image
Hanmi Financial
Price$28.19
Change+$0.05 (+0.18%)
Volume$6.12K
Capitalization842.94M
Merchants Ban
Price$18.97
Change-$0.20 (-1.04%)
Volume$100
CapitalizationN/A
HAFC vs MBINN Comparison Chart in %
HAFC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MBINN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HAFC vs. MBINN commentary
Dec 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HAFC is a Buy and MBINN is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 04, 2025
Stock price -- (HAFC: $28.14 vs. MBINN: $19.17)
Brand notoriety: HAFC and MBINN are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HAFC: 231% vs. MBINN: 223%
Market capitalization -- HAFC: $842.94M vs. MBINN: $0
HAFC [@Regional Banks] is valued at $842.94M. MBINN’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $171.16B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $8.32B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HAFC’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileMBINN’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • HAFC’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • MBINN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, HAFC is a better buy in the long-term than MBINN.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HAFC’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MBINN’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HAFC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • MBINN’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both HAFC and MBINN are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

HAFC (@Regional Banks) experienced а +0.90% price change this week, while MBINN (@Regional Banks) price change was -0.70% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +1.30%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.65%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.32%.

Reported Earning Dates

HAFC is expected to report earnings on Jan 27, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+1.30% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HAFC YTD gains are higher at: 24.598 vs. MBINN (0.773). HAFC has more cash in the bank: 78.8M vs. MBINN (15.4M). HAFC has less debt than MBINN: HAFC (258M) vs MBINN (3.83B). MBINN has higher revenues than HAFC: MBINN (665M) vs HAFC (246M).
HAFCMBINNHAFC / MBINN
Capitalization843MN/A-
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD24.5980.7733,183%
P/E Ratio11.72N/A-
Revenue246M665M37%
Total Cash78.8M15.4M512%
Total Debt258M3.83B7%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HAFC: Fundamental Ratings
HAFC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
76
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
30
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
25
SMR RATING
1..100
30
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
44
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
48
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
29

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HAFCMBINN
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
46%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
41%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
44%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
43%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
47%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
43%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
HAFC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MBINN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CUURX59.900.95
+1.61%
Columbia Small Cap Value Discv Inst 2
DEQCX16.140.12
+0.75%
BNY Mellon Global Equity Income - C
FRUAX26.20N/A
N/A
Franklin Utilities Adv
IMEGX23.96N/A
N/A
Nomura Systematic Emerging Markets Eq R6
CRMEX6.84-0.57
-7.69%
CRM All Cap Value Inv

HAFC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HAFC has been closely correlated with TRMK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HAFC jumps, then TRMK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HAFC
1D Price
Change %
HAFC100%
+0.04%
TRMK - HAFC
78%
Closely correlated
+1.87%
PEBO - HAFC
77%
Closely correlated
+2.01%
BUSE - HAFC
76%
Closely correlated
+1.87%
HOPE - HAFC
76%
Closely correlated
+1.77%
UVSP - HAFC
75%
Closely correlated
+2.18%
More

MBINN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MBINN has been loosely correlated with HAFC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MBINN jumps, then HAFC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MBINN
1D Price
Change %
MBINN100%
-0.18%
HAFC - MBINN
41%
Loosely correlated
+0.04%
MSBI - MBINN
41%
Loosely correlated
+7.07%
FITBO - MBINN
40%
Loosely correlated
+0.10%
KRNY - MBINN
40%
Loosely correlated
+5.70%
FCNCO - MBINN
40%
Loosely correlated
-0.12%
More