HAFC
Price
$23.31
Change
+$0.35 (+1.52%)
Updated
Oct 17 closing price
Capitalization
702.24M
3 days until earnings call
MBINN
Price
$20.68
Change
+$0.27 (+1.32%)
Updated
Oct 17 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
Interact to see
Advertisement

HAFC vs MBINN

Header iconHAFC vs MBINN Comparison
Open Charts HAFC vs MBINNBanner chart's image
Hanmi Financial
Price$23.31
Change+$0.35 (+1.52%)
Volume$152.97K
Capitalization702.24M
Merchants Ban
Price$20.68
Change+$0.27 (+1.32%)
Volume$7.73K
CapitalizationN/A
HAFC vs MBINN Comparison Chart in %
HAFC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MBINN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HAFC vs. MBINN commentary
Oct 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HAFC is a Hold and MBINN is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 18, 2025
Stock price -- (HAFC: $23.31 vs. MBINN: $20.68)
Brand notoriety: HAFC and MBINN are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HAFC: 104% vs. MBINN: 86%
Market capitalization -- HAFC: $702.24M vs. MBINN: $0
HAFC [@Regional Banks] is valued at $702.24M. MBINN’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $175.41B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.76B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HAFC’s FA Score shows that 4 FA rating(s) are green whileMBINN’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • HAFC’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
  • MBINN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, HAFC is a better buy in the long-term than MBINN.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HAFC’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MBINN’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HAFC’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • MBINN’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MBINN is a better buy in the short-term than HAFC.

Price Growth

HAFC (@Regional Banks) experienced а -2.18% price change this week, while MBINN (@Regional Banks) price change was +0.58% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.16%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.57%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.72%.

Reported Earning Dates

HAFC is expected to report earnings on Oct 21, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.16% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MBINN YTD gains are higher at: 8.738 vs. HAFC (2.174). HAFC has more cash in the bank: 78.8M vs. MBINN (15.4M). HAFC has less debt than MBINN: HAFC (258M) vs MBINN (3.83B). MBINN has higher revenues than HAFC: MBINN (665M) vs HAFC (246M).
HAFCMBINNHAFC / MBINN
Capitalization702MN/A-
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD2.1748.73825%
P/E Ratio10.79N/A-
Revenue246M665M37%
Total Cash78.8M15.4M512%
Total Debt258M3.83B7%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HAFC: Fundamental Ratings
HAFC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
60
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
20
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
31
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
94
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
32
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
90

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HAFCMBINN
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
27%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
43%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
38%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
33%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
43%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
42%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
43%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
45%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
49%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
54%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
HAFC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MBINN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
EXTGX59.360.37
+0.63%
Eaton Vance Tx-Mgd Growth 1.2 A
CLWFX87.220.36
+0.41%
Columbia Cornerstone Growth Inst 2
LIORX13.36-0.01
-0.07%
ClearBridge International Value R
AAISX19.90-0.07
-0.35%
American Beacon International Eq Adv
LZISX10.44-0.06
-0.57%
Lazard Global Small Cap Eq Instl

HAFC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HAFC has been closely correlated with PEBO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HAFC jumps, then PEBO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HAFC
1D Price
Change %
HAFC100%
+1.52%
PEBO - HAFC
81%
Closely correlated
+1.73%
FFBC - HAFC
81%
Closely correlated
+1.98%
TRMK - HAFC
80%
Closely correlated
+2.26%
PB - HAFC
80%
Closely correlated
+2.07%
TCBK - HAFC
79%
Closely correlated
+1.06%
More

MBINN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MBINN has been loosely correlated with FITBO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 43% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MBINN jumps, then FITBO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MBINN
1D Price
Change %
MBINN100%
+1.32%
FITBO - MBINN
43%
Loosely correlated
-0.73%
HAFC - MBINN
41%
Loosely correlated
+1.52%
MSBI - MBINN
41%
Loosely correlated
+1.41%
KRNY - MBINN
40%
Loosely correlated
-0.31%
BMRC - MBINN
39%
Loosely correlated
+0.04%
More