Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HACK vs SMH
HACK vs SMH Comparison
Open Charts HACK vs SMH
Amplify Cybersecurity ETF
Price$84.23
Change+$0.97 (+1.17%)
Volume$896
Net Assets2.18B
VanEck Semiconductor ETF
Price$364.44
Change+$5.01 (+1.39%)
Volume$55.19K
Net Assets35.52B
HACK vs SMH Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HACK vs. SMH commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HACK is a Hold and SMH is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMH has more net assets: 35.5B vs. HACK (2.18B). SMH has a higher annual dividend yield than HACK: SMH (48.491) vs HACK (11.720). HACK was incepted earlier than SMH: HACK (11 years) vs SMH (14 years). SMH (0.35) has a lower expense ratio than HACK (0.60). HACK has a higher turnover SMH (15.00) vs SMH (15.00).
| HACK | SMH | HACK / SMH | |
| Gain YTD | 11.720 | 48.491 | 24% |
| Net Assets | 2.18B | 35.5B | 6% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 0.35 | 171% |
| Turnover | 71.00 | 15.00 | 473% |
| Yield | 0.06 | 0.30 | 21% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 14 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| HACK | SMH | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 89% | 6 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 90% | 6 days ago 81% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 83% | 6 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 77% | 6 days ago 88% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 88% | 6 days ago 90% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 81% | 6 days ago 84% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 88% | 6 days ago 90% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 84% | 16 days ago 82% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 88% | 6 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 85% | 6 days ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
HACK and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HACK has been closely correlated with PANW. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HACK jumps, then PANW could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HACK | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HACK | 100% | +0.81% | ||
| PANW - HACK | 80% Closely correlated | +1.12% | ||
| CRWD - HACK | 80% Closely correlated | +2.60% | ||
| ZS - HACK | 80% Closely correlated | -0.67% | ||
| NET - HACK | 72% Closely correlated | +2.08% | ||
| CYBR - HACK | 70% Closely correlated | +1.05% | ||
More | ||||
SMH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SMH has been closely correlated with KLAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SMH jumps, then KLAC could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SMH | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SMH | 100% | +1.88% | ||
| KLAC - SMH | 87% Closely correlated | +2.82% | ||
| NVDA - SMH | 86% Closely correlated | +0.76% | ||
| TSM - SMH | 85% Closely correlated | +1.54% | ||
| LRCX - SMH | 82% Closely correlated | +2.21% | ||
| AMAT - SMH | 81% Closely correlated | +4.20% | ||
More | ||||