Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HACK vs SMH
HACK vs SMH Comparison
Open Charts HACK vs SMH
Amplify Cybersecurity ETF
Price$86.87
Change+$0.60 (+0.70%)
Volume$940
Net Assets2.31B
VanEck Semiconductor ETF
Price$321.87
Change+$0.81 (+0.25%)
Volume$15.91K
Net Assets30.58B
HACK vs SMH Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HACK vs. SMH commentary
Sep 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HACK is a Hold and SMH is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMH has more net assets: 30.6B vs. HACK (2.32B). SMH has a higher annual dividend yield than HACK: SMH (32.911) vs HACK (15.814). HACK was incepted earlier than SMH: HACK (11 years) vs SMH (14 years). SMH (0.35) has a lower expense ratio than HACK (0.60). HACK has a higher turnover SMH (15.00) vs SMH (15.00).
| HACK | SMH | HACK / SMH | |
| Gain YTD | 15.814 | 32.911 | 48% |
| Net Assets | 2.32B | 30.6B | 8% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 0.35 | 171% |
| Turnover | 71.00 | 15.00 | 473% |
| Yield | 0.09 | 0.37 | 25% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 14 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| HACK | SMH | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 85% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 85% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 89% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 85% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 88% | 11 days ago 90% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 84% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 80% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
HACK and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HACK has been closely correlated with ZS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HACK jumps, then ZS could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HACK | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HACK | 100% | -0.14% | ||
| ZS - HACK | 83% Closely correlated | +0.79% | ||
| PANW - HACK | 80% Closely correlated | +0.75% | ||
| CRWD - HACK | 79% Closely correlated | -0.68% | ||
| NET - HACK | 74% Closely correlated | +0.29% | ||
| FTNT - HACK | 69% Closely correlated | -0.47% | ||
More | ||||
SMH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SMH has been closely correlated with NVDA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SMH jumps, then NVDA could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SMH | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SMH | 100% | +0.25% | ||
| NVDA - SMH | 87% Closely correlated | +0.28% | ||
| LRCX - SMH | 86% Closely correlated | +0.13% | ||
| KLAC - SMH | 84% Closely correlated | +0.47% | ||
| TSM - SMH | 82% Closely correlated | -1.20% | ||
| AMAT - SMH | 82% Closely correlated | +2.15% | ||
More | ||||