Advertisement
HACK vs PANW
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HACK is a Hold and PANW is a StrongBuy.
PANW | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 87 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 13 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 49 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 61 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 6 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 75 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| HACK | PANW | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 89% | 6 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 90% | 6 days ago 80% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 83% | 6 days ago 64% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 77% | 6 days ago 66% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 88% | 6 days ago 74% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 81% | 6 days ago 56% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 88% | 9 days ago 78% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 84% | 13 days ago 63% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 88% | 6 days ago 82% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 85% | 6 days ago 41% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| YANG | 23.88 | 0.34 | +1.44% |
| Direxion Daily FTSE China Bear 3X ETF | |||
| FDT | 78.11 | 0.04 | +0.05% |
| First Trust Dev Mkts Ex-US AlphaDEX® ETF | |||
| EEM | 54.29 | 0.01 | +0.02% |
| iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF | |||
| CIF | 1.74 | N/A | N/A |
| MFS Intermediate High Income Fund | |||
| HIMZ | 7.72 | -0.54 | -6.58% |
| Defiance Daily Target 2X Long HIMS ETF | |||
HACK and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HACK has been closely correlated with PANW. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HACK jumps, then PANW could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HACK | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HACK | 100% | +0.81% | ||
| PANW - HACK | 80% Closely correlated | +1.12% | ||
| CRWD - HACK | 80% Closely correlated | +2.60% | ||
| ZS - HACK | 80% Closely correlated | -0.67% | ||
| NET - HACK | 72% Closely correlated | +2.08% | ||
| CYBR - HACK | 70% Closely correlated | +1.05% | ||
More | ||||
PANW and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PANW has been closely correlated with CRWD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PANW jumps, then CRWD could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PANW | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PANW | 100% | +1.12% | ||
| CRWD - PANW | 70% Closely correlated | +2.60% | ||
| ZS - PANW | 69% Closely correlated | -0.67% | ||
| CYBR - PANW | 65% Loosely correlated | +1.05% | ||
| FTNT - PANW | 62% Loosely correlated | +1.38% | ||
| NOW - PANW | 62% Loosely correlated | +0.28% | ||
More | ||||