Advertisement
HACK vs PANW
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HACK is a Hold and PANW is a Buy.
PANW | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 37 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 87 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 16 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 54 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 59 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 7 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| HACK | PANW | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 75% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 89% | 3 days ago 84% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 63% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 67% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% | 3 days ago 74% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 89% | 3 days ago 74% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 87% | 5 days ago 76% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 64% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 4 days ago 72% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 53% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| REIT | 26.37 | 0.20 | +0.77% |
| ALPS Active REIT ETF | |||
| ISMD | 39.42 | 0.14 | +0.36% |
| Inspire Small/Mid Cap ETF | |||
| CGGG | 28.84 | 0.09 | +0.30% |
| Capital Group U.S. Large Growth ETF | |||
| FLAG | 27.74 | N/A | N/A |
| Global X S&P 500 U.S. Market Leaders Top 50 ETF | |||
| TOUS | 34.56 | -0.03 | -0.09% |
| T. Rowe Price International Equity ETF | |||
HACK and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HACK has been closely correlated with PANW. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HACK jumps, then PANW could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HACK | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HACK | 100% | +0.11% | ||
| PANW - HACK | 80% Closely correlated | -0.48% | ||
| ZS - HACK | 80% Closely correlated | +0.12% | ||
| CRWD - HACK | 80% Closely correlated | -0.36% | ||
| NET - HACK | 72% Closely correlated | +0.29% | ||
| CYBR - HACK | 70% Closely correlated | -0.48% | ||
More | ||||
PANW and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PANW has been closely correlated with CRWD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PANW jumps, then CRWD could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PANW | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PANW | 100% | -0.48% | ||
| CRWD - PANW | 71% Closely correlated | -0.36% | ||
| ZS - PANW | 69% Closely correlated | +0.12% | ||
| CYBR - PANW | 66% Loosely correlated | -0.48% | ||
| NOW - PANW | 62% Loosely correlated | -1.15% | ||
| FTNT - PANW | 61% Loosely correlated | +0.64% | ||
More | ||||