Advertisement
HACK vs PANW
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HACK is a Hold and PANW is a Hold.
PANW | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 54 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 88 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 17 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 43 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 62 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 9 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| HACK | PANW | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 86% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 3 days ago 61% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 3 days ago 67% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 74% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 58% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 88% | 4 days ago 77% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 85% | 9 days ago 65% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 89% | 3 days ago 85% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | N/A |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| BUFQ | 34.25 | 0.07 | +0.20% |
| FT Vest Laddered Nasdaq Buffer ETF | |||
| SOXY | 53.60 | 0.05 | +0.10% |
| YieldMax Target 12 Smcndctr Opt Inc ETF | |||
| CRED | 21.04 | N/A | N/A |
| Columbia Research Enhanced Rl Estt ETF | |||
| PSCE | 39.74 | -0.07 | -0.17% |
| Invesco S&P SmallCap Energy ETF | |||
| PPIE | 27.46 | -0.08 | -0.30% |
| Putnam PanAgora ESG Intl Eq ETF | |||
HACK and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HACK has been closely correlated with CRWD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HACK jumps, then CRWD could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HACK | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HACK | 100% | -1.74% | ||
| CRWD - HACK | 81% Closely correlated | -1.68% | ||
| PANW - HACK | 78% Closely correlated | -1.87% | ||
| ZS - HACK | 75% Closely correlated | -2.44% | ||
| NET - HACK | 73% Closely correlated | -1.99% | ||
| AVGO - HACK | 72% Closely correlated | +0.69% | ||
More | ||||
PANW and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PANW has been closely correlated with CRWD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PANW jumps, then CRWD could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PANW | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PANW | 100% | -1.87% | ||
| CRWD - PANW | 67% Closely correlated | -1.68% | ||
| ZS - PANW | 63% Loosely correlated | -2.44% | ||
| ADSK - PANW | 60% Loosely correlated | -1.14% | ||
| NOW - PANW | 59% Loosely correlated | -1.44% | ||
| CRM - PANW | 59% Loosely correlated | -1.54% | ||
More | ||||