Advertisement
HACK vs PANW
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HACK is a Hold and PANW is a Hold.
PANW | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 58 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 86 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 26 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 53 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 62 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 8 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 75 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| HACK | PANW | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 83% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 81% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 86% | 1 day ago 67% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 87% | 1 day ago 65% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 84% | 1 day ago 63% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 82% | 1 day ago 57% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 87% | 22 days ago 76% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 85% | 1 day ago 64% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 88% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 51% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| RSHO | 50.52 | 0.81 | +1.63% |
| Tema American Reshoring ETF | |||
| OLOXF | 3.10 | N/A | N/A |
| Deutsche Bank AG (London Branch) | |||
| BDGS | 34.75 | -0.08 | -0.22% |
| Bridges Capital Tactical ETF | |||
| LLDR | 45.26 | -0.26 | -0.58% |
| Global X Long-Term Treasury Ladder ETF | |||
| CRBN | 235.70 | -1.89 | -0.80% |
| iShares Low Carbon Optd MSCI ACWI ETF | |||
HACK and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HACK has been closely correlated with CRWD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HACK jumps, then CRWD could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HACK | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HACK | 100% | -3.25% | ||
| CRWD - HACK | 81% Closely correlated | -3.90% | ||
| ZS - HACK | 80% Closely correlated | -6.26% | ||
| PANW - HACK | 80% Closely correlated | -5.23% | ||
| NET - HACK | 71% Closely correlated | -6.64% | ||
| ATEN - HACK | 70% Closely correlated | -2.37% | ||
More | ||||
PANW and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PANW has been closely correlated with CRWD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PANW jumps, then CRWD could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PANW | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PANW | 100% | -5.23% | ||
| CRWD - PANW | 72% Closely correlated | -3.90% | ||
| ZS - PANW | 69% Closely correlated | -6.26% | ||
| NOW - PANW | 62% Loosely correlated | -6.97% | ||
| CYBR - PANW | 61% Loosely correlated | -4.82% | ||
| FTNT - PANW | 61% Loosely correlated | -2.45% | ||
More | ||||