Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HACAX vs RGEBX
HACAX vs RGEBX Comparison
Open Charts HACAX vs RGEBX
Harbor Capital Appreciation Instl
Price$116.57
Change-$1.66 (-1.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets27.35B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2E
Price$74.89
Change-$0.91 (-1.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets306.22B
HACAX vs RGEBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HACAX vs. RGEBX commentary
Jun 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HACAX is a StrongBuy and RGEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 306B vs. HACAX (27.3B). HACAX (0.00) and RGEBX (0.00) have matching dividends . HACAX was incepted earlier than RGEBX: HACAX (37 years) vs RGEBX (11 years). RGEBX (1.09) is less costly to investors than HACAX (0.72). HACAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 28.00 vs. RGEBX (25.00). RGEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than HACAX: RGEBX (250) vs HACAX (50000). RGEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.68 vs. HACAX (2.20). RGEBX return over 5 years is better than : 45.42 vs. HACAX (38.31).
| HACAX | RGEBX | HACAX / RGEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.09 | 61% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 1.09 | 66% |
| Fund Existence | 37 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.551 | 4.829 | 53% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 50000 | 250 | 20,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 27.3B | 306B | 9% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.20 | 7.68 | 29% |
| Returns for 3 years | 83.63 | 51.01 | 164% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.31 | 45.42 | 84% |
| Returns for 10 years | 82.43 | 65.87 | 125% |