Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HACAX vs RGACX
HACAX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts HACAX vs RGACX
Harbor Capital Appreciation Instl
Price$125.59
Change-$0.22 (-0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets28.58B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$83.16
Change+$0.19 (+0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets332.38B
HACAX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HACAX vs. RGACX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HACAX is a Buy and RGACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 332B vs. HACAX (28.6B). RGACX pays higher dividends than HACAX: RGACX (0.07) vs HACAX (0.00). HACAX was incepted earlier than RGACX: HACAX (38 years) vs RGACX (23 years). RGACX (0.94) is less costly to investors than HACAX (0.72). HACAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 28.00 vs. RGACX (25.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than HACAX: RGACX (250) vs HACAX (50000). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.83 vs. HACAX (11.59). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 40.02 vs. HACAX (21.05).
| HACAX | RGACX | HACAX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.94 | 71% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 0.94 | 77% |
| Fund Existence | 38 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.486 | 15.516 | 68% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 50000 | 250 | 20,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 28.6B | 332B | 9% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.07 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.59 | 17.83 | 65% |
| Returns for 3 years | 81.75 | 58.53 | 140% |
| Returns for 5 years | 21.05 | 40.02 | 53% |
| Returns for 10 years | 103.91 | 95.93 | 108% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement