GZPZY
Price
$36.86
Change
-$0.30 (-0.81%)
Updated
Aug 19 closing price
Capitalization
6.82B
SCEYF
Price
$10.60
Change
+$0.50 (+4.95%)
Updated
Aug 28 closing price
Capitalization
137.01M
Interact to see
Advertisement

GZPZY vs SCEYF

Header iconGZPZY vs SCEYF Comparison
Open Charts GZPZY vs SCEYFBanner chart's image
Gaztransport & Tecnigaz
Price$36.86
Change-$0.30 (-0.81%)
Volume$603
Capitalization6.82B
Source Energy Services
Price$10.60
Change+$0.50 (+4.95%)
Volume$100
Capitalization137.01M
GZPZY vs SCEYF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
GZPZY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SCEYF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GZPZY vs. SCEYF commentary
Sep 03, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GZPZY is a Hold and SCEYF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 03, 2025
Stock price -- (GZPZY: $36.86 vs. SCEYF: $10.60)
Brand notoriety: GZPZY and SCEYF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Oilfield Services/Equipment industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GZPZY: 74% vs. SCEYF: 11%
Market capitalization -- GZPZY: $6.85B vs. SCEYF: $135.31M
GZPZY [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] is valued at $6.85B. SCEYF’s [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] market capitalization is $135.31M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] industry ranges from $53.55B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] industry is $3.17B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GZPZY’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSCEYF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • GZPZY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SCEYF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, SCEYF is a better buy in the long-term than GZPZY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GZPZY’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SCEYF’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GZPZY’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SCEYF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SCEYF is a better buy in the short-term than GZPZY.

Price Growth

GZPZY (@Oilfield Services/Equipment) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while SCEYF (@Oilfield Services/Equipment) price change was +2.91% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oilfield Services/Equipment industry was +1.61%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.40%, and the average quarterly price growth was +17.68%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oilfield Services/Equipment (+1.61% weekly)

The oilfield services/equipment industry is involved in providing various equipment and services to oil and natural gas producers. These companies rent drilling rigs and/or provide services to build and maintain oil and gas wells. The performance of this industry is dependent on demand for oil and natural gas, which in turn is often driven by macroeconomic conditions or business cycles. Schlumberger NV, Halliburton Company, and Baker Hughes are some of the biggest oilfield services companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GZPZY($6.82B) has a higher market cap than SCEYF($137M). GZPZY has higher P/E ratio than SCEYF: GZPZY (16.45) vs SCEYF (4.94). GZPZY YTD gains are higher at: 43.252 vs. SCEYF (-5.610). GZPZY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 543M vs. SCEYF (142M). GZPZY has more cash in the bank: 360M vs. SCEYF (43.8M). SCEYF (738M) and GZPZY (735M) have equivalent revenues.
GZPZYSCEYFGZPZY / SCEYF
Capitalization6.82B137M4,979%
EBITDA543M142M382%
Gain YTD43.252-5.610-771%
P/E Ratio16.454.94333%
Revenue735M738M100%
Total Cash360M43.8M822%
Total DebtN/A276M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SCEYF: Fundamental Ratings
SCEYF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
41
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
36
SMR RATING
1..100
45
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
45
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
55

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GZPZYSCEYF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
25%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
81%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
68%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
25%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
69%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
66%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
29%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
64%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
19%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
59%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
75%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
57%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
24%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
52%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GZPZY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SCEYF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
XPP27.620.46
+1.71%
ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50
PCHI25.340.04
+0.15%
Polen High Income ETF
ACWV119.410.16
+0.13%
iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF
CVY27.13-0.05
-0.20%
Invesco Zacks Multi-Asset Income ETF
FFA21.23-0.06
-0.28%
First Trust Enhanced Equity Income Fund

GZPZY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GZPZY and XPRO have been poorly correlated (+10% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GZPZY and XPRO's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GZPZY
1D Price
Change %
GZPZY100%
N/A
XPRO - GZPZY
10%
Poorly correlated
-0.72%
TOTZF - GZPZY
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
THNPY - GZPZY
5%
Poorly correlated
+0.24%
ACDC - GZPZY
4%
Poorly correlated
-5.44%
TNRSF - GZPZY
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

SCEYF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SCEYF and ACDC have been poorly correlated (+10% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SCEYF and ACDC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SCEYF
1D Price
Change %
SCEYF100%
N/A
ACDC - SCEYF
10%
Poorly correlated
-5.44%
XPRO - SCEYF
6%
Poorly correlated
-0.72%
WFRD - SCEYF
3%
Poorly correlated
-0.51%
JUTOY - SCEYF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GZPZY - SCEYF
-2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More