Advertisement
GZPZY vs SCEYF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GZPZY is a StrongBuy and SCEYF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
GZPZY’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSCEYF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- GZPZY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- SCEYF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
GZPZY’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SCEYF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- GZPZY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
- SCEYF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
GZPZY (@Oilfield Services/Equipment) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while SCEYF (@Oilfield Services/Equipment) price change was -7.12% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oilfield Services/Equipment industry was -0.33%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.64%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.99%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Oilfield Services/Equipment (-0.33% weekly)The oilfield services/equipment industry is involved in providing various equipment and services to oil and natural gas producers. These companies rent drilling rigs and/or provide services to build and maintain oil and gas wells. The performance of this industry is dependent on demand for oil and natural gas, which in turn is often driven by macroeconomic conditions or business cycles. Schlumberger NV, Halliburton Company, and Baker Hughes are some of the biggest oilfield services companies.
| GZPZY | SCEYF | GZPZY / SCEYF | |
| Capitalization | 7.69B | 110M | 6,994% |
| EBITDA | 543M | 142M | 382% |
| Gain YTD | 54.095 | -25.646 | -211% |
| P/E Ratio | 17.83 | 6.62 | 269% |
| Revenue | 735M | 738M | 100% |
| Total Cash | 360M | 43.8M | 822% |
| Total Debt | N/A | 276M | - |
SCEYF | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 32 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 42 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 45 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 44 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 62 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 3 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| GZPZY | SCEYF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 32% | 2 days ago 71% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 24% | 2 days ago 66% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 35% | 2 days ago 69% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 35% | 2 days ago 70% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 29% | 2 days ago 65% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 28% | 2 days ago 59% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 18% | 2 days ago 58% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 54% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| FLSW | 40.11 | 0.30 | +0.74% |
| Franklin FTSE Switzerland ETF | |||
| FFDI | 30.43 | 0.15 | +0.48% |
| Fidelity Fundamental Developed International ETF | |||
| EFAA | 54.00 | 0.24 | +0.45% |
| Invesco MSCI EAFE Income Advantage ETF | |||
| SEPW | 31.63 | 0.02 | +0.07% |
| AllianzIM U.S. Large Cp Buffer20 Sep ETF | |||
| MMIT | 24.37 | -0.08 | -0.33% |
| NYLI MacKay Muni Intermediate ETF | |||
GZPZY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that GZPZY and CFWFF have been poorly correlated (+10% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GZPZY and CFWFF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GZPZY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GZPZY | 100% | N/A | ||
| CFWFF - GZPZY | 10% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| TOLWF - GZPZY | 8% Poorly correlated | -2.73% | ||
| THNPY - GZPZY | 7% Poorly correlated | -0.75% | ||
| ACDC - GZPZY | 6% Poorly correlated | -10.24% | ||
| THNPF - GZPZY | 5% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
SCEYF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that SCEYF and WFRD have been poorly correlated (+7% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SCEYF and WFRD's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SCEYF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCEYF | 100% | -7.12% | ||
| WFRD - SCEYF | 7% Poorly correlated | -4.83% | ||
| ACDC - SCEYF | 6% Poorly correlated | -10.24% | ||
| GZPZY - SCEYF | 4% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| XPRO - SCEYF | 3% Poorly correlated | -3.45% | ||
| JUTOY - SCEYF | 3% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||