GYYMF
Price
$2.00
Change
+$0.09 (+4.71%)
Updated
Jun 6 closing price
Capitalization
240.3M
LEAT
Price
$9.02
Change
+$0.06 (+0.67%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
68.97M
Interact to see
Advertisement

GYYMF vs LEAT

Header iconGYYMF vs LEAT Comparison
Open Charts GYYMF vs LEATBanner chart's image
Gym Group
Price$2.00
Change+$0.09 (+4.71%)
Volume$4K
Capitalization240.3M
Leatt
Price$9.02
Change+$0.06 (+0.67%)
Volume$9.25K
Capitalization68.97M
GYYMF vs LEAT Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
GYYMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LEAT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GYYMF vs. LEAT commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GYYMF is a Hold and LEAT is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (GYYMF: $2.00 vs. LEAT: $9.02)
Brand notoriety: GYYMF and LEAT are both not notable
Both companies represent the Recreational Products industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GYYMF: 229% vs. LEAT: 225%
Market capitalization -- GYYMF: $240.3M vs. LEAT: $68.97M
GYYMF [@Recreational Products] is valued at $240.3M. LEAT’s [@Recreational Products] market capitalization is $68.97M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Recreational Products] industry ranges from $63.42B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Recreational Products] industry is $5.34B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GYYMF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileLEAT’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • GYYMF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • LEAT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, LEAT is a better buy in the long-term than GYYMF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GYYMF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LEAT’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GYYMF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 0 bearish.
  • LEAT’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GYYMF is a better buy in the short-term than LEAT.

Price Growth

GYYMF (@Recreational Products) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while LEAT (@Recreational Products) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Recreational Products industry was +4.20%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +20.60%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.58%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Recreational Products (+4.20% weekly)

The Leisure and Recreation Products industry includes companies offering recreational goods/services such as video games, swimming pools, golf courses, boats, outdoor spaces etc. Since these are mainly geared towards consumers, strong employment conditions and healthy incomes generally augur well for the recreational products industry. Some of the largest market caps in this space belong to video game developers (e.g. Activision Blizzard, Electronic Arts and Take-two Interactive), and toy /board game makers (like Hasbro).

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GYYMF($240M) has a higher market cap than LEAT($69M). LEAT YTD gains are higher at: 28.857 vs. GYYMF (2.041). GYYMF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 56.2M vs. LEAT (10.4M). LEAT has more cash in the bank: 11.4M vs. GYYMF (5.4M). LEAT has less debt than GYYMF: LEAT (1.89M) vs GYYMF (420M). GYYMF has higher revenues than LEAT: GYYMF (173M) vs LEAT (65.2M).
GYYMFLEATGYYMF / LEAT
Capitalization240M69M348%
EBITDA56.2M10.4M540%
Gain YTD2.04128.8577%
P/E RatioN/A10.45-
Revenue173M65.2M265%
Total Cash5.4M11.4M47%
Total Debt420M1.89M22,222%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GYYMF vs LEAT: Fundamental Ratings
GYYMF
LEAT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5045
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
99
Overvalued
77
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
9777
SMR RATING
1..100
9090
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5039
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
532
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
62n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LEAT's Valuation (77) in the null industry is in the same range as GYYMF (99). This means that LEAT’s stock grew similarly to GYYMF’s over the last 12 months.

LEAT's Profit vs Risk Rating (77) in the null industry is in the same range as GYYMF (97). This means that LEAT’s stock grew similarly to GYYMF’s over the last 12 months.

LEAT's SMR Rating (90) in the null industry is in the same range as GYYMF (90). This means that LEAT’s stock grew similarly to GYYMF’s over the last 12 months.

LEAT's Price Growth Rating (39) in the null industry is in the same range as GYYMF (50). This means that LEAT’s stock grew similarly to GYYMF’s over the last 12 months.

LEAT's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GYYMF (53). This means that LEAT’s stock grew somewhat faster than GYYMF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GYYMFLEAT
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
75%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
82%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
42%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
43%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
82%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
44%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
66%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GYYMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LEAT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MKTAY31.900.34
+1.06%
Makita Corp.
BREUF11.73N/A
N/A
Bridgemarq Real Estate Svc Inc.
HLFFF10.31N/A
N/A
Hellofresh SE
MBFJF13.51N/A
N/A
Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc.
SMOFF0.10N/A
-3.31%
SONORO GOLD CORP.

GYYMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GYYMF and LEAT have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GYYMF and LEAT's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GYYMF
1D Price
Change %
GYYMF100%
N/A
LEAT - GYYMF
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.67%
BSFFF - GYYMF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CUKPF - GYYMF
3%
Poorly correlated
+6.71%
FOCIF - GYYMF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GBBYF - GYYMF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

LEAT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LEAT and GYYMF have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LEAT and GYYMF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LEAT
1D Price
Change %
LEAT100%
+0.67%
GYYMF - LEAT
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NINOF - LEAT
17%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NINOY - LEAT
12%
Poorly correlated
-0.59%
NCBDF - LEAT
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LNNGF - LEAT
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More