GYUAF
Price
$17.50
Change
+$0.64 (+3.80%)
Updated
Apr 30 closing price
Capitalization
2.33B
YASKY
Price
$39.52
Change
+$0.80 (+2.07%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
5.27B
Interact to see
Advertisement

GYUAF vs YASKY

Header iconGYUAF vs YASKY Comparison
Open Charts GYUAF vs YASKYBanner chart's image
Gs Yuasa
Price$17.50
Change+$0.64 (+3.80%)
Volume$1K
Capitalization2.33B
Yaskawa Electric
Price$39.52
Change+$0.80 (+2.07%)
Volume$10.13K
Capitalization5.27B
GYUAF vs YASKY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
YASKY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GYUAF vs. YASKY commentary
Sep 09, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GYUAF is a Hold and YASKY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 09, 2025
Stock price -- (GYUAF: $17.50 vs. YASKY: $39.52)
Brand notoriety: GYUAF and YASKY are both not notable
GYUAF represents the Auto Parts: OEM, while YASKY is part of the Electrical Products industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GYUAF: 100% vs. YASKY: 70%
Market capitalization -- GYUAF: $2.33B vs. YASKY: $5.27B
GYUAF [@Auto Parts: OEM] is valued at $2.33B. YASKY’s [@Electrical Products] market capitalization is $5.27B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry ranges from $90.28B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Electrical Products] industry ranges from $209.48B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry is $6.59B. The average market capitalization across the [@Electrical Products] industry is $9.32B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GYUAF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileYASKY’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • GYUAF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • YASKY’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, GYUAF is a better buy in the long-term than YASKY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

YASKY’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • YASKY’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

GYUAF (@Auto Parts: OEM) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while YASKY (@Electrical Products) price change was -1.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Auto Parts: OEM industry was +1.09%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.64%, and the average quarterly price growth was +27.62%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electrical Products industry was +3.65%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.64%, and the average quarterly price growth was +24.45%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Auto Parts: OEM (+1.09% weekly)

OEM or Original Equipment Manufacturer of auto parts refers to the original producer of a vehicles components, and so OEM car parts are usually identical to the parts used in producing the vehicle in the first place. OEM parts tend to fit the specifications of a particular model, and their compatibility is often guaranteed by the automaker itself. OEM parts could be more expensive to buy (compared to other vendors’ products) when a consumer goes for replacement. However, increased competition from aftermarket parts/third-party vendors could, in some cases, keep EOM prices in check. The industry might progress further in adopting newer technologies like 3D printing to boost supply chain performance and quality. Aptiv PLC, Magna International Inc. and BorgWarner Inc. are major OEMs for autos.

@Electrical Products (+3.65% weekly)

The industry produces a diverse range of electricity-powered equipment, appliances and components, catering to both households and industries. The products include power, distribution and specialty transformers; electric motors, generators and motor-generator sets; switchgear and switchboard apparatus; light bulbs, tubes, fittings and electric signs etc. Consumer income, construction spending, and industrial production are major drivers of demand for this industry’s products. Large companies tend to have economies of scale in production, marketing, and distribution, while smaller companies can potentially carve out their own market through niche or specialty offerings. The US electrical products manufacturing industry includes about 5,700 establishments (single-location companies and units of multi-location companies) with combined annual revenue of about $125 billion. (according to a study published in First Research). Emerson Electric Co., Hubbell Incorporated and Eaton Corporation plc are major electrical products makers in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
YASKY($5.27B) has a higher market cap than GYUAF($2.33B). YASKY has higher P/E ratio than GYUAF: YASKY (14.35) vs GYUAF (11.31). GYUAF YTD gains are higher at: 3.796 vs. YASKY (-22.419). YASKY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 84.4B vs. GYUAF (72.6B). YASKY (56.8B) and GYUAF (54.3B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . YASKY has less debt than GYUAF: YASKY (105B) vs GYUAF (114B). GYUAF (571B) and YASKY (548B) have equivalent revenues.
GYUAFYASKYGYUAF / YASKY
Capitalization2.33B5.27B44%
EBITDA72.6B84.4B86%
Gain YTD3.796-22.419-17%
P/E Ratio11.3114.3579%
Revenue571B548B104%
Total Cash54.3B56.8B96%
Total Debt114B105B109%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GYUAF vs YASKY: Fundamental Ratings
GYUAF
YASKY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
21
Undervalued
92
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
10063
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5783
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2093
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
30n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

GYUAF's Valuation (21) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for YASKY (92). This means that GYUAF’s stock grew significantly faster than YASKY’s over the last 12 months.

GYUAF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as YASKY (100). This means that GYUAF’s stock grew similarly to YASKY’s over the last 12 months.

YASKY's SMR Rating (63) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GYUAF (100). This means that YASKY’s stock grew somewhat faster than GYUAF’s over the last 12 months.

GYUAF's Price Growth Rating (57) in the null industry is in the same range as YASKY (83). This means that GYUAF’s stock grew similarly to YASKY’s over the last 12 months.

GYUAF's P/E Growth Rating (20) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for YASKY (93). This means that GYUAF’s stock grew significantly faster than YASKY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GYUAFYASKY
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
56%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
68%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
77%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
10%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
69%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
12%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
71%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
68%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
YASKY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RNWGX91.700.67
+0.74%
American Funds New World R6
JIGCX52.720.38
+0.73%
Janus Henderson Overseas C
MXREX12.440.08
+0.62%
Empower Real Estate Index Inv
AZBAX24.820.07
+0.28%
Virtus Small-Cap A
MIGWX28.90-0.09
-0.31%
Marsico Growth Institutional

GYUAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GYUAF and EOSE have been poorly correlated (+4% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GYUAF and EOSE's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GYUAF
1D Price
Change %
GYUAF100%
N/A
EOSE - GYUAF
4%
Poorly correlated
-1.77%
ZMTBY - GYUAF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
VARGF - GYUAF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PLPKF - GYUAF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
YASKY - GYUAF
-7%
Poorly correlated
+2.05%
More

YASKY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, YASKY has been loosely correlated with MIELY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 44% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if YASKY jumps, then MIELY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To YASKY
1D Price
Change %
YASKY100%
+2.05%
MIELY - YASKY
44%
Loosely correlated
+3.80%
LGRDY - YASKY
37%
Loosely correlated
+0.99%
ABBNY - YASKY
34%
Loosely correlated
+0.70%
FELTY - YASKY
30%
Poorly correlated
+4.36%
PRYMY - YASKY
27%
Poorly correlated
+1.26%
More