Advertisement
GXYYY vs MLCO
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GXYYY is a StrongBuy and MLCO is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
GXYYY’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMLCO’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- GXYYY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- MLCO’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
GXYYY’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MLCO’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- GXYYY’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
- MLCO’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
GXYYY (@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines) experienced а +4.14% price change this week, while MLCO (@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines) price change was -0.16% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines industry was -0.92%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.93%, and the average quarterly price growth was -5.62%.
Reported Earning Dates
MLCO is expected to report earnings on Feb 12, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines (-0.92% weekly)The industry includes companies that operate and manage one or more of the following: lodging facilities (e.g. hotels and motels), resorts (e.g. ski resorts), spas, cruise ships and timeshare facilities. Marriott International, Inc., Carnival Corporation, Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. and Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. are some of the biggest names in this industry.
| GXYYY | MLCO | GXYYY / MLCO | |
| Capitalization | 24.4B | 2.4B | 1,015% |
| EBITDA | 13.6B | 1.09B | 1,249% |
| Gain YTD | 13.970 | -18.626 | -75% |
| P/E Ratio | 19.86 | 23.30 | 85% |
| Revenue | 45.2B | 5.06B | 893% |
| Total Cash | N/A | 1.48B | - |
| Total Debt | N/A | 7.63B | - |
GXYYY | MLCO | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 16 | 7 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 55 Fair valued | 98 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 12 | 100 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 47 | 64 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 24 | 96 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 75 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
GXYYY's Valuation (55) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MLCO (98) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry. This means that GXYYY’s stock grew somewhat faster than MLCO’s over the last 12 months.
GXYYY's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as MLCO (100) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry. This means that GXYYY’s stock grew similarly to MLCO’s over the last 12 months.
GXYYY's SMR Rating (12) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for MLCO (100) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry. This means that GXYYY’s stock grew significantly faster than MLCO’s over the last 12 months.
GXYYY's Price Growth Rating (47) in the null industry is in the same range as MLCO (64) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry. This means that GXYYY’s stock grew similarly to MLCO’s over the last 12 months.
GXYYY's P/E Growth Rating (24) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for MLCO (96) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry. This means that GXYYY’s stock grew significantly faster than MLCO’s over the last 12 months.
| GXYYY | MLCO | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 75% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 86% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 82% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 67% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 83% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 64% | 2 days ago 80% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 72% | 4 days ago 74% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 14 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 84% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 4 days ago 71% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 57% | 2 days ago 84% |
Advertisement
GXYYY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GXYYY has been closely correlated with SCHYY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GXYYY jumps, then SCHYY could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GXYYY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GXYYY | 100% | +0.72% | ||
| SCHYY - GXYYY | 81% Closely correlated | +0.98% | ||
| WYNMY - GXYYY | 71% Closely correlated | -0.13% | ||
| MLCO - GXYYY | 52% Loosely correlated | -2.38% | ||
| WYNN - GXYYY | 50% Loosely correlated | -1.16% | ||
| LVS - GXYYY | 45% Loosely correlated | +1.21% | ||
More | ||||
MLCO and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MLCO has been closely correlated with WYNN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MLCO jumps, then WYNN could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MLCO | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MLCO | 100% | -2.38% | ||
| WYNN - MLCO | 67% Closely correlated | -1.16% | ||
| VAC - MLCO | 55% Loosely correlated | -0.70% | ||
| PENN - MLCO | 55% Loosely correlated | -3.75% | ||
| SCHYY - MLCO | 54% Loosely correlated | +0.98% | ||
| GXYYY - MLCO | 52% Loosely correlated | +0.72% | ||
More | ||||