GXYEF
Price
$4.40
Change
+$0.22 (+5.26%)
Updated
Jun 25 closing price
Capitalization
30.47B
SCHYF
Price
$2.10
Change
+$0.34 (+19.32%)
Updated
Jun 26 closing price
Capitalization
30.88B
Interact to see
Advertisement

GXYEF vs SCHYF

Header iconGXYEF vs SCHYF Comparison
Open Charts GXYEF vs SCHYFBanner chart's image
Galaxy Entertainment Group
Price$4.40
Change+$0.22 (+5.26%)
Volume$2K
Capitalization30.47B
Sands China
Price$2.10
Change+$0.34 (+19.32%)
Volume$1K
Capitalization30.88B
GXYEF vs SCHYF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
GXYEF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SCHYF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GXYEF vs. SCHYF commentary
Jul 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GXYEF is a Buy and SCHYF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 06, 2025
Stock price -- (GXYEF: $4.40 vs. SCHYF: $2.10)
Brand notoriety: GXYEF and SCHYF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Casinos/Gaming industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GXYEF: 8% vs. SCHYF: 9%
Market capitalization -- GXYEF: $30.47B vs. SCHYF: $30.88B
GXYEF [@Casinos/Gaming] is valued at $30.47B. SCHYF’s [@Casinos/Gaming] market capitalization is $30.88B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Casinos/Gaming] industry ranges from $38.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Casinos/Gaming] industry is $6.02B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GXYEF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSCHYF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • GXYEF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • SCHYF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, GXYEF is a better buy in the long-term than SCHYF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GXYEF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SCHYF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GXYEF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • SCHYF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SCHYF is a better buy in the short-term than GXYEF.

Price Growth

GXYEF (@Casinos/Gaming) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while SCHYF (@Casinos/Gaming) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Casinos/Gaming industry was +4.58%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.31%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.74%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Casinos/Gaming (+4.58% weekly)

Casinos/Gaming includes companies that operate casinos, gaming services, horse racing and harness racing facilities. Think Las Vegas Sands Corp., MGM Resorts International and Wynn Resorts, Ltd. In periods of strong economic growth, consumers tend to spend on discretionary/leisure activities like gambling or games; but consumption is likely to slow down when there’s economic sluggishness.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SCHYF($30.9B) and GXYEF($30.5B) have the same market capitalization . GXYEF YTD gains are higher at: 4.019 vs. SCHYF (-14.408). GXYEF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.93B vs. SCHYF (-339M). GXYEF has higher revenues than SCHYF: GXYEF (15.6B) vs SCHYF (2.17B).
GXYEFSCHYFGXYEF / SCHYF
Capitalization30.5B30.9B99%
EBITDA1.93B-339M-570%
Gain YTD4.019-14.408-28%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue15.6B2.17B719%
Total CashN/A766M-
Total DebtN/A8.66B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GXYEF vs SCHYF: Fundamental Ratings
GXYEF
SCHYF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
20
Undervalued
57
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
1299
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4954
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8486
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

GXYEF's Valuation (20) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SCHYF (57). This means that GXYEF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SCHYF’s over the last 12 months.

GXYEF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as SCHYF (100). This means that GXYEF’s stock grew similarly to SCHYF’s over the last 12 months.

GXYEF's SMR Rating (12) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for SCHYF (99). This means that GXYEF’s stock grew significantly faster than SCHYF’s over the last 12 months.

GXYEF's Price Growth Rating (49) in the null industry is in the same range as SCHYF (54). This means that GXYEF’s stock grew similarly to SCHYF’s over the last 12 months.

GXYEF's P/E Growth Rating (84) in the null industry is in the same range as SCHYF (86). This means that GXYEF’s stock grew similarly to SCHYF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GXYEFSCHYF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
54%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
58%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
54%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
44%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
49%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
36%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
48%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GXYEF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SCHYF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LLYVK81.611.36
+1.69%
Liberty Media Corp
HPP2.720.03
+1.12%
Hudson Pacific Properties
MYNZ1.43N/A
N/A
Mainz Biomed N.V.
BIDU86.35-0.09
-0.10%
Baidu
CTGO19.65-0.45
-2.24%
Contango ORE

GXYEF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GXYEF has been loosely correlated with SCHYY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GXYEF jumps, then SCHYY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GXYEF
1D Price
Change %
GXYEF100%
N/A
SCHYY - GXYEF
35%
Loosely correlated
+1.20%
GXYYY - GXYEF
32%
Poorly correlated
+0.51%
WYNMY - GXYEF
24%
Poorly correlated
-0.40%
SCHYF - GXYEF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NGCRF - GXYEF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

SCHYF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SCHYF and MCHVF have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SCHYF and MCHVF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SCHYF
1D Price
Change %
SCHYF100%
N/A
MCHVF - SCHYF
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SCHYY - SCHYF
24%
Poorly correlated
+1.20%
SJMHF - SCHYF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GXYEF - SCHYF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WYNMF - SCHYF
16%
Poorly correlated
-6.87%
More