GXYEF
Price
$4.40
Change
+$0.22 (+5.26%)
Updated
Jun 25 closing price
Capitalization
30.47B
MCHVY
Price
$21.34
Change
+$0.34 (+1.62%)
Updated
Jul 2 closing price
Capitalization
5.04B
Interact to see
Advertisement

GXYEF vs MCHVY

Header iconGXYEF vs MCHVY Comparison
Open Charts GXYEF vs MCHVYBanner chart's image
Galaxy Entertainment Group
Price$4.40
Change+$0.22 (+5.26%)
Volume$2K
Capitalization30.47B
MGM China Holdings
Price$21.34
Change+$0.34 (+1.62%)
Volume$9.44K
Capitalization5.04B
GXYEF vs MCHVY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
GXYEF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MCHVY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GXYEF vs. MCHVY commentary
Jul 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GXYEF is a Buy and MCHVY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 06, 2025
Stock price -- (GXYEF: $4.40 vs. MCHVY: $21.34)
Brand notoriety: GXYEF and MCHVY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Casinos/Gaming industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GXYEF: 8% vs. MCHVY: 1053%
Market capitalization -- GXYEF: $30.47B vs. MCHVY: $5.04B
GXYEF [@Casinos/Gaming] is valued at $30.47B. MCHVY’s [@Casinos/Gaming] market capitalization is $5.04B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Casinos/Gaming] industry ranges from $38.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Casinos/Gaming] industry is $6.02B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GXYEF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMCHVY’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • GXYEF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • MCHVY’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, GXYEF is a better buy in the long-term than MCHVY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GXYEF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MCHVY’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GXYEF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • MCHVY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MCHVY is a better buy in the short-term than GXYEF.

Price Growth

GXYEF (@Casinos/Gaming) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while MCHVY (@Casinos/Gaming) price change was +9.83% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Casinos/Gaming industry was +4.58%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.31%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.74%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Casinos/Gaming (+4.58% weekly)

Casinos/Gaming includes companies that operate casinos, gaming services, horse racing and harness racing facilities. Think Las Vegas Sands Corp., MGM Resorts International and Wynn Resorts, Ltd. In periods of strong economic growth, consumers tend to spend on discretionary/leisure activities like gambling or games; but consumption is likely to slow down when there’s economic sluggishness.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GXYEF($30.5B) has a higher market cap than MCHVY($5.04B). MCHVY YTD gains are higher at: 48.549 vs. GXYEF (4.019). GXYEF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.93B vs. MCHVY (-1.06B). GXYEF has higher revenues than MCHVY: GXYEF (15.6B) vs MCHVY (7.92B).
GXYEFMCHVYGXYEF / MCHVY
Capitalization30.5B5.04B605%
EBITDA1.93B-1.06B-183%
Gain YTD4.01948.5498%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue15.6B7.92B197%
Total CashN/A6.95B-
Total DebtN/A30.6B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GXYEF vs MCHVY: Fundamental Ratings
GXYEF
MCHVY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
20
Undervalued
86
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10054
SMR RATING
1..100
12100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4939
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8492
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

GXYEF's Valuation (20) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for MCHVY (86). This means that GXYEF’s stock grew significantly faster than MCHVY’s over the last 12 months.

MCHVY's Profit vs Risk Rating (54) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GXYEF (100). This means that MCHVY’s stock grew somewhat faster than GXYEF’s over the last 12 months.

GXYEF's SMR Rating (12) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for MCHVY (100). This means that GXYEF’s stock grew significantly faster than MCHVY’s over the last 12 months.

MCHVY's Price Growth Rating (39) in the null industry is in the same range as GXYEF (49). This means that MCHVY’s stock grew similarly to GXYEF’s over the last 12 months.

GXYEF's P/E Growth Rating (84) in the null industry is in the same range as MCHVY (92). This means that GXYEF’s stock grew similarly to MCHVY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GXYEFMCHVY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
58%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
48%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
58%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
50%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
44%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
50%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
52%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
59%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
36%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
58%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GXYEF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MCHVY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
QOWZ35.730.38
+1.06%
Invesco Nasdaq Free CA Flw Achiev ETF
OCTU26.520.18
+0.70%
AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 UncOctETF
AVDS62.590.16
+0.25%
Avantis International Small Cp Eq ETF
UTWO48.33N/A
N/A
F/m US Treasury 2 Year Note ETF
COPX46.46-0.16
-0.34%
Global X Copper Miners ETF

GXYEF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GXYEF has been loosely correlated with SCHYY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GXYEF jumps, then SCHYY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GXYEF
1D Price
Change %
GXYEF100%
N/A
SCHYY - GXYEF
35%
Loosely correlated
+1.20%
GXYYY - GXYEF
32%
Poorly correlated
+0.51%
WYNMY - GXYEF
24%
Poorly correlated
-0.40%
SCHYF - GXYEF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NGCRF - GXYEF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

MCHVY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MCHVY and AAPI have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MCHVY and AAPI's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MCHVY
1D Price
Change %
MCHVY100%
N/A
AAPI - MCHVY
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WYNN - MCHVY
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.91%
GXYEF - MCHVY
16%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GXYYY - MCHVY
15%
Poorly correlated
+0.51%
MCHVF - MCHVY
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More