Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GXUS vs SCHF
GXUS vs SCHF Comparison
Open Charts GXUS vs SCHF
Goldman Sachs MarketBeta(R) Ttl IntEqETF
Price$52.01
Change-$0.62 (-1.18%)
Volume$147
Net Assets530.29M
Schwab International Equity ETF™
Price$23.08
Change+$0.14 (+0.61%)
Volume$64.17K
Net Assets51.25B
GXUS vs SCHF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GXUS vs. SCHF commentary
Sep 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GXUS is a Buy and SCHF is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SCHF has more net assets: 51.3B vs. GXUS (530M). SCHF has a higher annual dividend yield than GXUS: SCHF (24.818) vs GXUS (16.479). GXUS was incepted earlier than SCHF: GXUS (2 years) vs SCHF (16 years). SCHF (0.03) has a lower expense ratio than GXUS (0.18). GXUS (4.00) and SCHF (4.00) have matching turnover.
| GXUS | SCHF | GXUS / SCHF | |
| Gain YTD | 16.479 | 24.818 | 66% |
| Net Assets | 530M | 51.3B | 1% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.18 | 0.03 | 600% |
| Turnover | 4.00 | 4.00 | 100% |
| Yield | 2.82 | 2.48 | 114% |
| Fund Existence | 2 years | 16 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| GXUS | SCHF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% | 2 days ago 71% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 79% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 85% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 50% | 2 days ago 84% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 79% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 48% | 2 days ago 78% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 16 days ago 84% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 79% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 82% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 80% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
GXUS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GXUS has been loosely correlated with ICAGY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GXUS jumps, then ICAGY could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GXUS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GXUS | 100% | N/A | ||
| ICAGY - GXUS | 42% Loosely correlated | -1.18% | ||
| TAL - GXUS | 20% Poorly correlated | +0.90% | ||
| LTM - GXUS | 20% Poorly correlated | -6.05% | ||
| BP - GXUS | 19% Poorly correlated | +0.14% | ||
| CPS - GXUS | 19% Poorly correlated | -1.77% | ||
More | ||||
SCHF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SCHF has been closely correlated with SAN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SCHF jumps, then SAN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SCHF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCHF | 100% | -0.69% | ||
| SAN - SCHF | 71% Closely correlated | -0.68% | ||
| BN - SCHF | 70% Closely correlated | -1.75% | ||
| MT - SCHF | 68% Closely correlated | +1.03% | ||
| MFC - SCHF | 68% Closely correlated | -0.97% | ||
| MFG - SCHF | 65% Loosely correlated | -0.15% | ||
More | ||||