Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GXUS vs SCHF
GXUS vs SCHF Comparison
Open Charts GXUS vs SCHF
Goldman Sachs MarketBeta(R) Ttl IntEqETF
Price$59.25
Change+$5.04 (+9.30%)
Volume$458
Net Assets596.13M
Schwab International Equity ETF™
Price$25.65
Change-$0.02 (-0.08%)
Volume$299
Net Assets58.43B
GXUS vs SCHF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GXUS vs. SCHF commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GXUS is a Hold and SCHF is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SCHF has more net assets: 58.4B vs. GXUS (596M). SCHF has a higher annual dividend yield than GXUS: SCHF (6.780) vs GXUS (6.106). GXUS was incepted earlier than SCHF: GXUS (3 years) vs SCHF (16 years). SCHF (0.03) has a lower expense ratio than GXUS (0.18). GXUS has a higher turnover SCHF (4.00) vs SCHF (4.00).
| GXUS | SCHF | GXUS / SCHF | |
| Gain YTD | 6.106 | 6.780 | 90% |
| Net Assets | 596M | 58.4B | 1% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.18 | 0.03 | 600% |
| Turnover | 5.00 | 4.00 | 125% |
| Yield | 2.49 | 3.21 | 78% |
| Fund Existence | 3 years | 16 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| GXUS | SCHF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 79% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 66% | N/A |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 78% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 78% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 84% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 68% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 80% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 74% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
GXUS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GXUS has been loosely correlated with ICAGY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GXUS jumps, then ICAGY could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GXUS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GXUS | 100% | +0.19% | ||
| ICAGY - GXUS | 42% Loosely correlated | -0.34% | ||
| HLN - GXUS | 27% Poorly correlated | -0.66% | ||
| ONC - GXUS | 26% Poorly correlated | +0.40% | ||
| LTM - GXUS | 19% Poorly correlated | -1.05% | ||
| EDU - GXUS | 19% Poorly correlated | +2.30% | ||
More | ||||
SCHF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SCHF has been closely correlated with STM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SCHF jumps, then STM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SCHF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCHF | 100% | +0.23% | ||
| STM - SCHF | 79% Closely correlated | -3.16% | ||
| SAN - SCHF | 76% Closely correlated | -6.36% | ||
| BN - SCHF | 70% Closely correlated | -4.21% | ||
| BBVA - SCHF | 69% Closely correlated | -1.08% | ||
| MFC - SCHF | 68% Closely correlated | -0.83% | ||
More | ||||