Advertisement
GXUS vs ICAGY
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GXUS is a Hold and ICAGY is a StrongBuy.
ICAGY | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 13 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 50 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 24 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 18 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 46 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 47 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 19 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| GXUS | ICAGY | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 60% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 66% | 2 days ago 61% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 67% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 68% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 71% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 68% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 3 days ago 70% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 68% | 10 days ago 67% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 66% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 78% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| PHYS | 37.10 | 2.10 | +6.00% |
| Sprott Physical Gold Trust | |||
| AOK | 40.65 | -0.02 | -0.06% |
| iShares Core 30/70 Cnsrv Allc ETF | |||
| CBON | 23.02 | -0.02 | -0.09% |
| VanEck China Bond ETF | |||
| XMAR | 40.12 | -0.04 | -0.10% |
| FT Vest U.S. Eq Enh & ModBufETF-Mar | |||
| ZSEP | 26.90 | -0.04 | -0.15% |
| Innovator Equity Defined Prot ETF-1YrSep | |||
GXUS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GXUS has been loosely correlated with ICAGY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GXUS jumps, then ICAGY could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GXUS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GXUS | 100% | +0.19% | ||
| ICAGY - GXUS | 42% Loosely correlated | -0.34% | ||
| HLN - GXUS | 27% Poorly correlated | -0.66% | ||
| ONC - GXUS | 26% Poorly correlated | +0.40% | ||
| LTM - GXUS | 19% Poorly correlated | -1.05% | ||
| EDU - GXUS | 19% Poorly correlated | +2.30% | ||
More | ||||
ICAGY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ICAGY has been loosely correlated with DLAKY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ICAGY jumps, then DLAKY could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ICAGY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ICAGY | 100% | -0.34% | ||
| DLAKY - ICAGY | 65% Loosely correlated | +0.57% | ||
| ESYJY - ICAGY | 54% Loosely correlated | -0.15% | ||
| UAL - ICAGY | 48% Loosely correlated | +3.27% | ||
| DAL - ICAGY | 47% Loosely correlated | +1.97% | ||
| AAL - ICAGY | 46% Loosely correlated | +2.34% | ||
More | ||||