50 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GXC vs YUMC
GXC vs YUMC Comparison
Open Charts GXC vs YUMC
SPDR® S&P China ETF
Price$86.88
Change-$1.46 (-1.65%)
Volume$16.33K
Net Assets428.73M
Yum China Holdings
Price$43.57
Change-$1.08 (-2.42%)
Volume$1.58M
Capitalization16.19B
GXC vs YUMC Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GXC vs. YUMC commentary
Jun 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GXC is a Hold and YUMC is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
YUMC: Fundamental Ratings
YUMC | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 31 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 54 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 61 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 48 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| GXC | YUMC | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 70% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 58% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 79% | 3 days ago 66% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 64% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 79% | 3 days ago 69% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 81% | 5 days ago 63% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 19 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 67% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 76% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 72% | 3 days ago 80% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
GXC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GXC has been closely correlated with WB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GXC jumps, then WB could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GXC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GXC | 100% | -1.65% | ||
| WB - GXC | 78% Closely correlated | -1.44% | ||
| BEKE - GXC | 71% Closely correlated | -2.74% | ||
| BZ - GXC | 68% Closely correlated | -3.13% | ||
| YUMC - GXC | 66% Loosely correlated | -2.42% | ||
| NOAH - GXC | 64% Loosely correlated | -2.02% | ||
More | ||||
YUMC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, YUMC has been loosely correlated with YUM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 48% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if YUMC jumps, then YUM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To YUMC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YUMC | 100% | -2.42% | ||
| YUM - YUMC | 48% Loosely correlated | +0.02% | ||
| QSR - YUMC | 38% Loosely correlated | -1.54% | ||
| HDL - YUMC | 32% Poorly correlated | -0.05% | ||
| ARCO - YUMC | 32% Poorly correlated | -0.53% | ||
| DIN - YUMC | 29% Poorly correlated | -1.16% | ||
More | ||||