Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GXC vs KWEB
GXC vs KWEB Comparison
Open Charts GXC vs KWEB
SPDR® S&P China ETF
Price$102.45
Change-$0.85 (-0.82%)
Volume$120
Net Assets498.41M
KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF
Price$41.13
Change-$0.56 (-1.34%)
Volume$980
Net Assets9.61B
GXC vs KWEB Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GXC vs. KWEB commentary
Sep 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GXC is a Hold and KWEB is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
KWEB has more net assets: 9.61B vs. GXC (498M). KWEB has a higher annual dividend yield than GXC: KWEB (42.544) vs GXC (37.763). GXC was incepted earlier than KWEB: GXC (19 years) vs KWEB (12 years). GXC (0.59) has a lower expense ratio than KWEB (0.70). KWEB has a higher turnover GXC (24.00) vs GXC (24.00).
| GXC | KWEB | GXC / KWEB | |
| Gain YTD | 37.763 | 42.544 | 89% |
| Net Assets | 498M | 9.61B | 5% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.70 | 84% |
| Turnover | 24.00 | 54.00 | 44% |
| Yield | 2.57 | 2.74 | 94% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 12 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| GXC | KWEB | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 89% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 89% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 89% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 85% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 88% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 86% | 4 days ago 90% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 88% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 83% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
GXC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GXC has been closely correlated with BZ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GXC jumps, then BZ could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GXC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GXC | 100% | +0.29% | ||
| BZ - GXC | 72% Closely correlated | +0.04% | ||
| WB - GXC | 69% Closely correlated | -1.04% | ||
| BEKE - GXC | 69% Closely correlated | +0.68% | ||
| ATHM - GXC | 68% Closely correlated | -1.33% | ||
| PDD - GXC | 67% Closely correlated | +0.04% | ||
More | ||||
KWEB and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KWEB has been closely correlated with BZ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if KWEB jumps, then BZ could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To KWEB | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| KWEB | 100% | +0.29% | ||
| BZ - KWEB | 78% Closely correlated | +0.04% | ||
| PDD - KWEB | 75% Closely correlated | +0.04% | ||
| BEKE - KWEB | 75% Closely correlated | +0.68% | ||
| ATHM - KWEB | 75% Closely correlated | -1.33% | ||
| WB - KWEB | 74% Closely correlated | -1.04% | ||
More | ||||