Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GXC vs KWEB
GXC vs KWEB Comparison
Open Charts GXC vs KWEB
State Street® SPDR® S&P® China ETF
Price$100.33
Change-$3.64 (-3.50%)
Volume$12.77K
Net Assets505.43M
KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF
Price$34.42
Change-$6.92 (-16.74%)
Volume$33.16M
Net Assets8.48B
GXC vs KWEB Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GXC vs. KWEB commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GXC is a Hold and KWEB is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
KWEB has more net assets: 8.48B vs. GXC (505M). GXC has a higher annual dividend yield than KWEB: GXC (3.915) vs KWEB (2.996). GXC was incepted earlier than KWEB: GXC (19 years) vs KWEB (13 years). GXC (0.59) has a lower expense ratio than KWEB (0.70). KWEB has a higher turnover GXC (13.00) vs GXC (13.00).
| GXC | KWEB | GXC / KWEB | |
| Gain YTD | 3.915 | 2.996 | 131% |
| Net Assets | 505M | 8.48B | 6% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.70 | 84% |
| Turnover | 13.00 | 54.00 | 24% |
| Yield | 2.27 | 5.86 | 39% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 13 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| GXC | KWEB | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 89% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 89% | 3 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% | 3 days ago 90% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 79% | 3 days ago 85% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 80% | 7 days ago 87% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 90% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 77% | 3 days ago 88% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 77% | 3 days ago 85% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
GXC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GXC has been closely correlated with JD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GXC jumps, then JD could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GXC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GXC | 100% | -1.42% | ||
| JD - GXC | 80% Closely correlated | +0.18% | ||
| BILI - GXC | 80% Closely correlated | -2.35% | ||
| BABA - GXC | 78% Closely correlated | -0.69% | ||
| BIDU - GXC | 74% Closely correlated | -3.01% | ||
| BZUN - GXC | 70% Closely correlated | -1.49% | ||
More | ||||
KWEB and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KWEB has been closely correlated with BABA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 89% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if KWEB jumps, then BABA could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To KWEB | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| KWEB | 100% | -0.88% | ||
| BABA - KWEB | 89% Closely correlated | -0.69% | ||
| JD - KWEB | 83% Closely correlated | +0.18% | ||
| BILI - KWEB | 82% Closely correlated | -2.35% | ||
| BIDU - KWEB | 80% Closely correlated | -3.01% | ||
| KC - KWEB | 79% Closely correlated | +3.18% | ||
More | ||||