Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GXC vs KWEB
GXC vs KWEB Comparison
Open Charts GXC vs KWEB
SPDR® S&P China ETF
Price$86.88
Change-$1.46 (-1.65%)
Volume$16.33K
Net Assets428.73M
KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF
Price$34.00
Change-$0.85 (-2.44%)
Volume$21.57M
Net Assets6.38B
GXC vs KWEB Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GXC vs. KWEB commentary
Jun 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GXC is a Hold and KWEB is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
KWEB has more net assets: 6.38B vs. GXC (429M). KWEB has a higher annual dividend yield than GXC: KWEB (16.279) vs GXC (14.497). GXC was incepted earlier than KWEB: GXC (18 years) vs KWEB (12 years). GXC (0.59) has a lower expense ratio than KWEB (0.70). KWEB has a higher turnover GXC (24.00) vs GXC (24.00).
| GXC | KWEB | GXC / KWEB | |
| Gain YTD | 14.497 | 16.279 | 89% |
| Net Assets | 429M | 6.38B | 7% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.70 | 84% |
| Turnover | 24.00 | 32.00 | 75% |
| Yield | 2.51 | 3.09 | 81% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 12 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| GXC | KWEB | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 79% | 3 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 90% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 79% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 81% | 28 days ago 88% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 19 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 90% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 76% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 72% | 3 days ago 79% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
GXC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GXC has been closely correlated with WB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GXC jumps, then WB could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GXC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GXC | 100% | -1.65% | ||
| WB - GXC | 78% Closely correlated | -1.44% | ||
| BEKE - GXC | 71% Closely correlated | -2.74% | ||
| BZ - GXC | 68% Closely correlated | -3.13% | ||
| YUMC - GXC | 66% Loosely correlated | -2.42% | ||
| NOAH - GXC | 64% Loosely correlated | -2.02% | ||
More | ||||
KWEB and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KWEB has been closely correlated with WB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if KWEB jumps, then WB could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To KWEB | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| KWEB | 100% | -2.44% | ||
| WB - KWEB | 83% Closely correlated | -1.44% | ||
| BEKE - KWEB | 77% Closely correlated | -2.74% | ||
| BZ - KWEB | 75% Closely correlated | -3.13% | ||
| YMM - KWEB | 73% Closely correlated | -4.08% | ||
| IQ - KWEB | 72% Closely correlated | -5.46% | ||
More | ||||