Advertisement
GWAV vs TSPCF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GWAV is a StrongBuy and TSPCF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
GWAV’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTSPCF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- GWAV’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- TSPCF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
GWAV’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- GWAV’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
GWAV (@Environmental Services) experienced а -10.28% price change this week, while TSPCF (@Environmental Services) price change was -5.48% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Environmental Services industry was +2.59%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.28%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.33%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Environmental Services (+2.59% weekly)Environmental Services includes companies that collect and dispose of hazardous and non-hazardous waste. Their services include removal of toxic waste from soil, removing medical waste etc. Some companies also operate incinerators, sewerage systems, waste treatment plants, and landfills. Demand for waste management is likely to rise with increasing urbanization/industrialization. Waste Management, Inc., Republic Services, Inc., Waste Connections, Inc. and Tetra Tech, Inc. are some of the major companies in this business.
| GWAV | TSPCF | GWAV / TSPCF | |
| Capitalization | 2.47M | 4.09B | 0% |
| EBITDA | -14.62M | 527M | -3% |
| Gain YTD | -72.681 | 10.366 | -701% |
| P/E Ratio | 0.40 | 75.76 | 1% |
| Revenue | 32.6M | 3.38B | 1% |
| Total Cash | 1.45M | 69.4M | 2% |
| Total Debt | 37.5M | 1.07B | 3% |
GWAV | TSPCF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 16 Undervalued | 78 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 51 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | 93 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 94 | 53 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | 98 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
GWAV's Valuation (16) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TSPCF (78). This means that GWAV’s stock grew somewhat faster than TSPCF’s over the last 12 months.
TSPCF's Profit vs Risk Rating (51) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GWAV (100). This means that TSPCF’s stock grew somewhat faster than GWAV’s over the last 12 months.
TSPCF's SMR Rating (93) in the null industry is in the same range as GWAV (100). This means that TSPCF’s stock grew similarly to GWAV’s over the last 12 months.
TSPCF's Price Growth Rating (53) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GWAV (94). This means that TSPCF’s stock grew somewhat faster than GWAV’s over the last 12 months.
TSPCF's P/E Growth Rating (98) in the null industry is in the same range as GWAV (100). This means that TSPCF’s stock grew similarly to GWAV’s over the last 12 months.
| GWAV | |
|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 87% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 77% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% |
Advertisement
GWAV and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that GWAV and AQMS have been poorly correlated (+15% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GWAV and AQMS's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GWAV | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GWAV | 100% | -5.79% | ||
| AQMS - GWAV | 15% Poorly correlated | -2.39% | ||
| LNZA - GWAV | 14% Poorly correlated | -9.27% | ||
| AGXXF - GWAV | 10% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| ANRGF - GWAV | 9% Poorly correlated | -1.94% | ||
| QRHC - GWAV | 7% Poorly correlated | -3.86% | ||
More | ||||
TSPCF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that TSPCF and LNZA have been poorly correlated (+11% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TSPCF and LNZA's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TSPCF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TSPCF | 100% | N/A | ||
| LNZA - TSPCF | 11% Poorly correlated | -9.27% | ||
| ROOOF - TSPCF | 6% Poorly correlated | +0.58% | ||
| AMBI - TSPCF | 4% Poorly correlated | +9.53% | ||
| AGXXF - TSPCF | 1% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| GWAV - TSPCF | 1% Poorly correlated | -5.79% | ||
More | ||||