Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GVIP vs SCHG
GVIP vs SCHG Comparison
Open Charts GVIP vs SCHG
Goldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF
Price$160.38
Change+$5.63 (+3.64%)
Volume$15.88K
Net Assets464.53M
Schwab US Large-Cap Growth ETF™
Price$31.44
Change-$1.06 (-3.26%)
Volume$22.94M
Net Assets52.49B
GVIP vs SCHG Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GVIP vs. SCHG commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GVIP is a Hold and SCHG is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SCHG has more net assets: 52.5B vs. GVIP (465M). GVIP has a higher annual dividend yield than SCHG: GVIP (3.538) vs SCHG (-3.617). GVIP was incepted earlier than SCHG: GVIP (9 years) vs SCHG (16 years). SCHG (0.04) has a lower expense ratio than GVIP (0.45). GVIP has a higher turnover SCHG (27.00) vs SCHG (27.00).
| GVIP | SCHG | GVIP / SCHG | |
| Gain YTD | 3.538 | -3.617 | -98% |
| Net Assets | 465M | 52.5B | 1% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.45 | 0.04 | 1,125% |
| Turnover | 137.00 | 27.00 | 507% |
| Yield | 0.33 | 0.37 | 90% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 16 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| GVIP | SCHG | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 77% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 75% | 1 day ago 75% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 89% | 1 day ago 84% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 80% | 1 day ago 77% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 79% | 1 day ago 78% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 86% | 1 day ago 83% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 85% | 9 days ago 86% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 74% | 6 days ago 78% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 86% | 1 day ago 85% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
GVIP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GVIP has been closely correlated with APO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GVIP jumps, then APO could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GVIP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GVIP | 100% | -0.85% | ||
| APO - GVIP | 80% Closely correlated | -4.76% | ||
| KKR - GVIP | 78% Closely correlated | -9.69% | ||
| NVDA - GVIP | 77% Closely correlated | -2.84% | ||
| VRT - GVIP | 75% Closely correlated | +0.07% | ||
| COF - GVIP | 74% Closely correlated | -0.15% | ||
More | ||||
SCHG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SCHG has been closely correlated with AMZN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SCHG jumps, then AMZN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SCHG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCHG | 100% | -1.96% | ||
| AMZN - SCHG | 80% Closely correlated | -1.79% | ||
| NVDA - SCHG | 79% Closely correlated | -2.84% | ||
| PH - SCHG | 78% Closely correlated | +1.30% | ||
| MSFT - SCHG | 77% Closely correlated | -2.87% | ||
| APO - SCHG | 76% Closely correlated | -4.76% | ||
More | ||||