Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GVIP vs SCHG
GVIP vs SCHG Comparison
Open Charts GVIP vs SCHG
Goldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF
Price$141.21
Change+$0.58 (+0.41%)
Volume$9.14K
Net Assets363.52M
Schwab US Large-Cap Growth ETF™
Price$30.21
Change+$0.15 (+0.50%)
Volume$6.97M
Net Assets46.23B
GVIP vs SCHG Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GVIP vs. SCHG commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GVIP is a Hold and SCHG is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SCHG has more net assets: 46.2B vs. GVIP (364M). GVIP has a higher annual dividend yield than SCHG: GVIP (13.814) vs SCHG (8.615). GVIP was incepted earlier than SCHG: GVIP (9 years) vs SCHG (16 years). SCHG (0.04) has a lower expense ratio than GVIP (0.45). GVIP has a higher turnover SCHG (3.00) vs SCHG (3.00).
| GVIP | SCHG | GVIP / SCHG | |
| Gain YTD | 13.814 | 8.615 | 160% |
| Net Assets | 364M | 46.2B | 1% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.45 | 0.04 | 1,125% |
| Turnover | 144.00 | 3.00 | 4,800% |
| Yield | 0.26 | 0.39 | 65% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 16 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| GVIP | SCHG | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 74% | 3 days ago 73% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 75% | 3 days ago 75% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 5 days ago 86% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 74% | 3 days ago 89% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% | 3 days ago 88% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 88% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 88% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 76% | 17 days ago 80% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 75% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 89% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
GVIP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GVIP has been closely correlated with VRT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GVIP jumps, then VRT could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GVIP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GVIP | 100% | +0.41% | ||
| VRT - GVIP | 77% Closely correlated | +5.04% | ||
| GEV - GVIP | 74% Closely correlated | +3.30% | ||
| HLT - GVIP | 74% Closely correlated | +2.27% | ||
| COF - GVIP | 73% Closely correlated | N/A | ||
| APG - GVIP | 72% Closely correlated | +1.33% | ||
More | ||||
SCHG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SCHG has been closely correlated with META. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SCHG jumps, then META could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SCHG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCHG | 100% | +0.50% | ||
| META - SCHG | 79% Closely correlated | -0.30% | ||
| MSFT - SCHG | 78% Closely correlated | +0.55% | ||
| PH - SCHG | 76% Closely correlated | +1.26% | ||
| CDNS - SCHG | 75% Closely correlated | +2.33% | ||
| APO - SCHG | 75% Closely correlated | -0.34% | ||
More | ||||