Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GVIP vs SCHG
GVIP vs SCHG Comparison
Open Charts GVIP vs SCHG
Goldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF
Price$150.55
Change-$4.15 (-2.68%)
Volume$10.53K
Net Assets425.25M
Schwab US Large-Cap Growth ETF™
Price$32.25
Change-$0.75 (-2.27%)
Volume$17.27M
Net Assets51.53B
GVIP vs SCHG Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GVIP vs. SCHG commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GVIP is a Hold and SCHG is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SCHG has more net assets: 51.5B vs. GVIP (425M). GVIP has a higher annual dividend yield than SCHG: GVIP (24.692) vs SCHG (18.756). GVIP was incepted earlier than SCHG: GVIP (9 years) vs SCHG (16 years). SCHG (0.04) has a lower expense ratio than GVIP (0.45). GVIP has a higher turnover SCHG (3.00) vs SCHG (3.00).
| GVIP | SCHG | GVIP / SCHG | |
| Gain YTD | 24.692 | 18.756 | 132% |
| Net Assets | 425M | 51.5B | 1% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.45 | 0.04 | 1,125% |
| Turnover | 144.00 | 3.00 | 4,800% |
| Yield | 0.23 | 0.35 | 65% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 16 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| GVIP | SCHG | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 80% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 79% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 78% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 76% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 89% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 89% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 86% | 17 days ago 88% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 23 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 77% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 86% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| HDGRX | 38.63 | 0.19 | +0.49% |
| Hartford Dividend and Growth R3 | |||
| BRUKX | 17.21 | 0.05 | +0.29% |
| MFS Blended Research Value Equity R2 | |||
| NGDRX | 33.94 | 0.02 | +0.06% |
| Neuberger Berman Large Cap Growth R3 | |||
| HMSIX | 12.31 | -0.02 | -0.16% |
| Hennessy Midstream Institutional | |||
| WWSYX | 20.17 | -0.04 | -0.20% |
| Westwood Quality SmallCap Fund Ultra | |||
GVIP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GVIP has been closely correlated with APO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GVIP jumps, then APO could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GVIP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GVIP | 100% | +0.23% | ||
| APO - GVIP | 78% Closely correlated | +0.53% | ||
| KKR - GVIP | 78% Closely correlated | +1.41% | ||
| NVDA - GVIP | 77% Closely correlated | +0.33% | ||
| VRT - GVIP | 75% Closely correlated | -3.17% | ||
| C - GVIP | 74% Closely correlated | +2.09% | ||
More | ||||
SCHG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SCHG has been closely correlated with AMZN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SCHG jumps, then AMZN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SCHG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCHG | 100% | -0.12% | ||
| AMZN - SCHG | 80% Closely correlated | -1.97% | ||
| NVDA - SCHG | 79% Closely correlated | +0.33% | ||
| PH - SCHG | 78% Closely correlated | -0.42% | ||
| MSFT - SCHG | 76% Closely correlated | +0.48% | ||
| META - SCHG | 75% Closely correlated | -2.88% | ||
More | ||||