Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GVIP vs QQQM
GVIP vs QQQM Comparison
Open Charts GVIP vs QQQM
Goldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF
Price$160.41
Change+$1.91 (+1.21%)
Volume$1.55K
Net Assets453.8M
Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF
Price$255.11
Change-$2.73 (-1.06%)
Volume$7.38M
Net Assets72.11B
GVIP vs QQQM Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GVIP vs. QQQM commentary
Jan 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GVIP is a Hold and QQQM is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
QQQM has more net assets: 72.1B vs. GVIP (454M). GVIP has a higher annual dividend yield than QQQM: GVIP (2.324) vs QQQM (0.866). GVIP was incepted earlier than QQQM: GVIP (9 years) vs QQQM (5 years). QQQM (0.15) has a lower expense ratio than GVIP (0.45). GVIP has a higher turnover QQQM (6.00) vs QQQM (6.00).
| GVIP | QQQM | GVIP / QQQM | |
| Gain YTD | 2.324 | 0.866 | 268% |
| Net Assets | 454M | 72.1B | 1% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.45 | 0.15 | 300% |
| Turnover | 137.00 | 6.00 | 2,283% |
| Yield | 0.34 | 0.50 | 67% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 5 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| GVIP | QQQM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 68% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 78% | 1 day ago 74% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 82% | 1 day ago 83% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 86% | 1 day ago 86% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 79% | 1 day ago 80% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 86% | 1 day ago 83% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 85% | 4 days ago 87% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 74% | 1 day ago 80% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 89% | 1 day ago 84% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 87% | N/A |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
GVIP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GVIP has been closely correlated with APO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GVIP jumps, then APO could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GVIP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GVIP | 100% | -0.59% | ||
| APO - GVIP | 78% Closely correlated | +0.57% | ||
| KKR - GVIP | 78% Closely correlated | +1.54% | ||
| NVDA - GVIP | 77% Closely correlated | -1.44% | ||
| VRT - GVIP | 76% Closely correlated | -1.08% | ||
| C - GVIP | 74% Closely correlated | -3.34% | ||
More | ||||
QQQM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QQQM has been closely correlated with AMZN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if QQQM jumps, then AMZN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QQQM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QQQM | 100% | -1.06% | ||
| AMZN - QQQM | 79% Closely correlated | -2.45% | ||
| NVDA - QQQM | 78% Closely correlated | -1.44% | ||
| LRCX - QQQM | 78% Closely correlated | -2.61% | ||
| KLAC - QQQM | 77% Closely correlated | -0.51% | ||
| META - QQQM | 76% Closely correlated | -2.47% | ||
More | ||||