Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GVIP vs QQQM
GVIP vs QQQM Comparison
Open Charts GVIP vs QQQM
Goldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF
Price$156.58
Change+$0.78 (+0.50%)
Volume$3.98K
Net Assets442.59M
Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF
Price$256.87
Change+$0.69 (+0.27%)
Volume$2.48M
Net Assets70.9B
GVIP vs QQQM Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GVIP vs. QQQM commentary
Dec 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GVIP is a Buy and QQQM is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
QQQM has more net assets: 70.9B vs. GVIP (443M). GVIP has a higher annual dividend yield than QQQM: GVIP (26.206) vs QQQM (22.582). GVIP was incepted earlier than QQQM: GVIP (9 years) vs QQQM (5 years). QQQM (0.15) has a lower expense ratio than GVIP (0.45). GVIP has a higher turnover QQQM (6.00) vs QQQM (6.00).
| GVIP | QQQM | GVIP / QQQM | |
| Gain YTD | 26.206 | 22.582 | 116% |
| Net Assets | 443M | 70.9B | 1% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.45 | 0.15 | 300% |
| Turnover | 137.00 | 6.00 | 2,283% |
| Yield | 0.23 | 0.49 | 47% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 5 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| GVIP | QQQM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 79% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 88% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 88% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 89% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 87% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 87% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 74% | 11 days ago 80% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 85% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
GVIP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GVIP has been closely correlated with APO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GVIP jumps, then APO could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GVIP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GVIP | 100% | +0.50% | ||
| APO - GVIP | 78% Closely correlated | +0.32% | ||
| KKR - GVIP | 78% Closely correlated | -0.17% | ||
| NVDA - GVIP | 77% Closely correlated | -0.32% | ||
| VRT - GVIP | 76% Closely correlated | +0.37% | ||
| C - GVIP | 74% Closely correlated | +1.81% | ||
More | ||||
QQQM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QQQM has been closely correlated with AMZN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if QQQM jumps, then AMZN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QQQM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QQQM | 100% | +0.27% | ||
| AMZN - QQQM | 79% Closely correlated | +0.10% | ||
| NVDA - QQQM | 78% Closely correlated | -0.32% | ||
| LRCX - QQQM | 78% Closely correlated | +1.24% | ||
| KLAC - QQQM | 77% Closely correlated | +0.65% | ||
| META - QQQM | 76% Closely correlated | +0.39% | ||
More | ||||