Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GVIP vs QQEW
GVIP vs QQEW Comparison
Open Charts GVIP vs QQEW
Goldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF
Price$138.52
Change+$1.10 (+0.80%)
Volume$3.09K
Net Assets350.01M
First Trust NASDAQ-100 Equal Wtd ETF
Price$138.44
Change+$1.56 (+1.14%)
Volume$22.9K
Net Assets1.91B
GVIP vs QQEW Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GVIP vs. QQEW commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GVIP is a Hold and QQEW is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
QQEW has more net assets: 1.91B vs. GVIP (350M). GVIP has a higher annual dividend yield than QQEW: GVIP (11.647) vs QQEW (11.030). GVIP was incepted earlier than QQEW: GVIP (9 years) vs QQEW (19 years). GVIP (0.45) has a lower expense ratio than QQEW (0.57). GVIP has a higher turnover QQEW (26.00) vs QQEW (26.00).
| GVIP | QQEW | GVIP / QQEW | |
| Gain YTD | 11.647 | 11.030 | 106% |
| Net Assets | 350M | 1.91B | 18% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.45 | 0.57 | 79% |
| Turnover | 144.00 | 26.00 | 554% |
| Yield | 0.26 | 0.41 | 63% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 19 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| GVIP | QQEW | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 80% | 4 days ago 82% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 72% | 4 days ago 85% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 89% | 4 days ago 85% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 88% | 4 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 87% | 4 days ago 86% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 86% | 4 days ago 83% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 86% | 4 days ago 88% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 27 days ago 76% | 17 days ago 78% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 76% | 4 days ago 84% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 86% | 4 days ago 81% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
GVIP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GVIP has been closely correlated with VRT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GVIP jumps, then VRT could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GVIP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GVIP | 100% | +0.80% | ||
| VRT - GVIP | 77% Closely correlated | +2.82% | ||
| GEV - GVIP | 75% Closely correlated | +2.37% | ||
| HLT - GVIP | 75% Closely correlated | +1.23% | ||
| COF - GVIP | 72% Closely correlated | +0.96% | ||
| APG - GVIP | 71% Closely correlated | +2.26% | ||
More | ||||
QQEW and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QQEW has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if QQEW jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QQEW | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QQEW | 100% | +1.14% | ||
| LRCX - QQEW | 81% Closely correlated | -0.02% | ||
| NXPI - QQEW | 80% Closely correlated | +0.41% | ||
| MCHP - QQEW | 78% Closely correlated | -0.14% | ||
| MU - QQEW | 74% Closely correlated | +0.45% | ||
| ON - QQEW | 74% Closely correlated | +1.16% | ||
More | ||||