Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GVIP vs IWF
GVIP vs IWF Comparison
Open Charts GVIP vs IWF
Goldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF
Price$131.26
Change-$2.11 (-1.58%)
Volume$3.02K
Net Assets324.98M
iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF
Price$405.57
Change-$5.20 (-1.27%)
Volume$952.15K
Net Assets106.55B
GVIP vs IWF Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GVIP vs. IWF commentary
Jun 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GVIP is a Hold and IWF is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IWF has more net assets: 107B vs. GVIP (325M). GVIP has a higher annual dividend yield than IWF: GVIP (5.801) vs IWF (1.102). GVIP was incepted earlier than IWF: GVIP (9 years) vs IWF (25 years). IWF (0.19) has a lower expense ratio than GVIP (0.45). GVIP has a higher turnover IWF (12.00) vs IWF (12.00).
| GVIP | IWF | GVIP / IWF | |
| Gain YTD | 5.801 | 1.102 | 527% |
| Net Assets | 325M | 107B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.45 | 0.19 | 237% |
| Turnover | 144.00 | 12.00 | 1,200% |
| Yield | 0.27 | 0.45 | 61% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 25 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| GVIP | IWF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 72% | 3 days ago 86% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% | 3 days ago 84% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 76% | 3 days ago 84% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 79% | 3 days ago 78% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 87% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 86% | 6 days ago 87% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 76% | 26 days ago 80% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 68% | 4 days ago 83% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 88% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
GVIP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GVIP has been closely correlated with VRT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GVIP jumps, then VRT could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GVIP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GVIP | 100% | -1.58% | ||
| VRT - GVIP | 77% Closely correlated | -3.08% | ||
| HLT - GVIP | 75% Closely correlated | -2.66% | ||
| GEV - GVIP | 75% Closely correlated | -1.89% | ||
| COF - GVIP | 72% Closely correlated | -2.45% | ||
| APG - GVIP | 71% Closely correlated | -0.75% | ||
More | ||||
IWF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IWF has been closely correlated with MSFT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IWF jumps, then MSFT could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IWF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IWF | 100% | -1.27% | ||
| MSFT - IWF | 77% Closely correlated | -0.82% | ||
| CDNS - IWF | 75% Closely correlated | -2.55% | ||
| AMZN - IWF | 73% Closely correlated | -0.53% | ||
| SNPS - IWF | 71% Closely correlated | -3.26% | ||
| LRCX - IWF | 69% Closely correlated | -2.33% | ||
More | ||||