Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GVIP vs IWF
GVIP vs IWF Comparison
Open Charts GVIP vs IWF
Goldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF
Price$138.52
Change+$1.10 (+0.80%)
Volume$3.09K
Net Assets350.01M
iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF
Price$428.27
Change+$4.75 (+1.12%)
Volume$567.68K
Net Assets112.55B
GVIP vs IWF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GVIP vs. IWF commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GVIP is a Hold and IWF is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IWF has more net assets: 113B vs. GVIP (350M). GVIP has a higher annual dividend yield than IWF: GVIP (11.647) vs IWF (6.864). GVIP was incepted earlier than IWF: GVIP (9 years) vs IWF (25 years). IWF (0.19) has a lower expense ratio than GVIP (0.45). GVIP has a higher turnover IWF (12.00) vs IWF (12.00).
| GVIP | IWF | GVIP / IWF | |
| Gain YTD | 11.647 | 6.864 | 170% |
| Net Assets | 350M | 113B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.45 | 0.19 | 237% |
| Turnover | 144.00 | 12.00 | 1,200% |
| Yield | 0.26 | 0.42 | 61% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 25 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| GVIP | IWF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 80% | 4 days ago 77% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 72% | 4 days ago 79% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 89% | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 88% | 4 days ago 80% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 87% | 4 days ago 88% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 86% | 4 days ago 87% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 86% | 4 days ago 87% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 27 days ago 76% | 17 days ago 79% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 76% | 4 days ago 78% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 86% | 4 days ago 88% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
GVIP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GVIP has been closely correlated with VRT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GVIP jumps, then VRT could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GVIP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GVIP | 100% | +0.80% | ||
| VRT - GVIP | 77% Closely correlated | +2.82% | ||
| GEV - GVIP | 75% Closely correlated | +2.37% | ||
| HLT - GVIP | 75% Closely correlated | +1.23% | ||
| COF - GVIP | 72% Closely correlated | +0.96% | ||
| APG - GVIP | 71% Closely correlated | +2.26% | ||
More | ||||
IWF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IWF has been closely correlated with MSFT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IWF jumps, then MSFT could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IWF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IWF | 100% | +1.12% | ||
| MSFT - IWF | 77% Closely correlated | +1.58% | ||
| CDNS - IWF | 75% Closely correlated | +5.10% | ||
| AMZN - IWF | 73% Closely correlated | +1.59% | ||
| SNPS - IWF | 71% Closely correlated | +4.90% | ||
| LRCX - IWF | 69% Closely correlated | -0.02% | ||
More | ||||