Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GVIP vs IWF
GVIP vs IWF Comparison
Open Charts GVIP vs IWF
Goldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF
Price$160.41
Change+$1.91 (+1.21%)
Volume$1.55K
Net Assets453.8M
iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF
Price$473.58
Change+$3.44 (+0.73%)
Volume$3.39K
Net Assets122.46B
GVIP vs IWF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GVIP vs. IWF commentary
Jan 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GVIP is a Hold and IWF is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IWF has more net assets: 122B vs. GVIP (454M). GVIP has a higher annual dividend yield than IWF: GVIP (2.324) vs IWF (-0.668). GVIP was incepted earlier than IWF: GVIP (9 years) vs IWF (26 years). IWF (0.18) has a lower expense ratio than GVIP (0.45). GVIP has a higher turnover IWF (13.00) vs IWF (13.00).
| GVIP | IWF | GVIP / IWF | |
| Gain YTD | 2.324 | -0.668 | -348% |
| Net Assets | 454M | 122B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.45 | 0.18 | 250% |
| Turnover | 137.00 | 13.00 | 1,054% |
| Yield | 0.34 | 0.36 | 94% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 26 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| GVIP | IWF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 68% | 14 days ago 86% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 78% | 1 day ago 79% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 82% | 1 day ago 76% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 86% | 1 day ago 85% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 79% | 1 day ago 78% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 86% | 1 day ago 83% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 85% | 4 days ago 86% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 74% | 1 day ago 78% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 89% | 1 day ago 84% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 87% | 1 day ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
GVIP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GVIP has been closely correlated with APO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GVIP jumps, then APO could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GVIP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GVIP | 100% | -0.59% | ||
| APO - GVIP | 78% Closely correlated | +0.57% | ||
| KKR - GVIP | 78% Closely correlated | +1.54% | ||
| NVDA - GVIP | 77% Closely correlated | -1.44% | ||
| VRT - GVIP | 76% Closely correlated | -1.08% | ||
| C - GVIP | 74% Closely correlated | -3.34% | ||
More | ||||
IWF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IWF has been closely correlated with CDNS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IWF jumps, then CDNS could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IWF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IWF | 100% | -1.19% | ||
| CDNS - IWF | 79% Closely correlated | -3.06% | ||
| SNPS - IWF | 78% Closely correlated | -1.26% | ||
| MSFT - IWF | 77% Closely correlated | -2.40% | ||
| AMZN - IWF | 74% Closely correlated | -2.45% | ||
| KLAC - IWF | 73% Closely correlated | -0.51% | ||
More | ||||