Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GVIP vs IWF
GVIP vs IWF Comparison
Open Charts GVIP vs IWF
Goldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF
Price$150.71
Change+$0.16 (+0.11%)
Volume$397
Net Assets425.25M
iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF
Price$470.84
Change+$0.92 (+0.20%)
Volume$12.95K
Net Assets122.83B
GVIP vs IWF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GVIP vs. IWF commentary
Nov 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GVIP is a Hold and IWF is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IWF has more net assets: 123B vs. GVIP (425M). GVIP has a higher annual dividend yield than IWF: GVIP (21.346) vs IWF (17.366). GVIP was incepted earlier than IWF: GVIP (9 years) vs IWF (26 years). IWF (0.18) has a lower expense ratio than GVIP (0.45). GVIP has a higher turnover IWF (13.00) vs IWF (13.00).
| GVIP | IWF | GVIP / IWF | |
| Gain YTD | 21.346 | 17.366 | 123% |
| Net Assets | 425M | 123B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.45 | 0.18 | 250% |
| Turnover | 144.00 | 13.00 | 1,108% |
| Yield | 0.23 | 0.34 | 67% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 26 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| GVIP | IWF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 77% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 79% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 80% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 77% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 87% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 86% | 18 days ago 87% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 24 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 77% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
GVIP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GVIP has been closely correlated with APO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GVIP jumps, then APO could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GVIP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GVIP | 100% | -2.68% | ||
| APO - GVIP | 78% Closely correlated | -3.65% | ||
| KKR - GVIP | 78% Closely correlated | -1.89% | ||
| NVDA - GVIP | 77% Closely correlated | -3.58% | ||
| VRT - GVIP | 75% Closely correlated | -5.61% | ||
| C - GVIP | 74% Closely correlated | -2.14% | ||
More | ||||
IWF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IWF has been closely correlated with CDNS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IWF jumps, then CDNS could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IWF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IWF | 100% | -2.12% | ||
| CDNS - IWF | 79% Closely correlated | +0.14% | ||
| SNPS - IWF | 78% Closely correlated | -1.22% | ||
| MSFT - IWF | 77% Closely correlated | -1.54% | ||
| AMZN - IWF | 74% Closely correlated | -2.71% | ||
| KLAC - IWF | 73% Closely correlated | -3.11% | ||
More | ||||