GUZOF
Price
$2.67
Change
+$0.05 (+1.91%)
Updated
Jun 2 closing price
Capitalization
891.08M
HLNFF
Price
$13.35
Change
+$0.18 (+1.37%)
Updated
Jul 16 closing price
Capitalization
300.75M
Interact to see
Advertisement

GUZOF vs HLNFF

Header iconGUZOF vs HLNFF Comparison
Open Charts GUZOF vs HLNFFBanner chart's image
Grupo Herdez, S.A.B. DE C.V
Price$2.67
Change+$0.05 (+1.91%)
Volume$11.93K
Capitalization891.08M
High Liner Foods
Price$13.35
Change+$0.18 (+1.37%)
Volume$110
Capitalization300.75M
GUZOF vs HLNFF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
GUZOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HLNFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GUZOF vs. HLNFF commentary
Jul 21, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GUZOF is a Hold and HLNFF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 21, 2025
Stock price -- (GUZOF: $2.67 vs. HLNFF: $13.35)
Brand notoriety: GUZOF and HLNFF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food: Specialty/Candy industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GUZOF: 135% vs. HLNFF: 4%
Market capitalization -- GUZOF: $891.08M vs. HLNFF: $300.75M
GUZOF [@Food: Specialty/Candy] is valued at $891.08M. HLNFF’s [@Food: Specialty/Candy] market capitalization is $300.75M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry ranges from $327.81B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry is $9.52B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GUZOF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileHLNFF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • GUZOF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • HLNFF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, HLNFF is a better buy in the long-term than GUZOF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GUZOF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HLNFF’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GUZOF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • HLNFF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GUZOF is a better buy in the short-term than HLNFF.

Price Growth

GUZOF (@Food: Specialty/Candy) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while HLNFF (@Food: Specialty/Candy) price change was +0.07% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Specialty/Candy industry was +11.17%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +12.47%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.03%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food: Specialty/Candy (+11.17% weekly)

A specialty/candy manufacturer specializes in one or more of the following: chocolate, candies, pasta, condiments, seasonings, among other items. Hershey Company, McCormick & Company and J.M. Smucker Company are some of the major firms in this segment. Demand for this industry’s products comes from both institutions/restaurants as well as households.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GUZOF($891M) has a higher market cap than HLNFF($301M). GUZOF has higher P/E ratio than HLNFF: GUZOF (11.32) vs HLNFF (10.30). HLNFF YTD gains are higher at: 19.982 vs. GUZOF (5.952). GUZOF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 7.18B vs. HLNFF (85.2M). GUZOF has more cash in the bank: 3.59B vs. HLNFF (10.5M). HLNFF has less debt than GUZOF: HLNFF (254M) vs GUZOF (11.5B). GUZOF has higher revenues than HLNFF: GUZOF (35.3B) vs HLNFF (1.08B).
GUZOFHLNFFGUZOF / HLNFF
Capitalization891M301M296%
EBITDA7.18B85.2M8,432%
Gain YTD5.95219.98230%
P/E Ratio11.3210.30110%
Revenue35.3B1.08B3,269%
Total Cash3.59B10.5M34,210%
Total Debt11.5B254M4,528%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GUZOF vs HLNFF: Fundamental Ratings
GUZOF
HLNFF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
30
Undervalued
22
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5820
SMR RATING
1..100
4955
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5747
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5585
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5075

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HLNFF's Valuation (22) in the null industry is in the same range as GUZOF (30). This means that HLNFF’s stock grew similarly to GUZOF’s over the last 12 months.

HLNFF's Profit vs Risk Rating (20) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GUZOF (58). This means that HLNFF’s stock grew somewhat faster than GUZOF’s over the last 12 months.

GUZOF's SMR Rating (49) in the null industry is in the same range as HLNFF (55). This means that GUZOF’s stock grew similarly to HLNFF’s over the last 12 months.

HLNFF's Price Growth Rating (47) in the null industry is in the same range as GUZOF (57). This means that HLNFF’s stock grew similarly to GUZOF’s over the last 12 months.

GUZOF's P/E Growth Rating (55) in the null industry is in the same range as HLNFF (85). This means that GUZOF’s stock grew similarly to HLNFF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GUZOFHLNFF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
24%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
51%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
27%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
30%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
45%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
31%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
33%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
42%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GUZOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HLNFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PGWIX12.700.14
+1.11%
Principal MidCap Growth Inst
ICTUX10.410.08
+0.77%
ICON Utilities and Income Instl
HFECX53.230.10
+0.19%
Janus Henderson European Focus C
LGLCX43.820.06
+0.14%
Lord Abbett Growth Leaders C
WASCX20.84-0.01
-0.05%
Macquarie Asset Strategy Fund Cl C

GUZOF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GUZOF has been loosely correlated with ARHUF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GUZOF jumps, then ARHUF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GUZOF
1D Price
Change %
GUZOF100%
N/A
ARHUF - GUZOF
53%
Loosely correlated
N/A
SRKE - GUZOF
22%
Poorly correlated
-59.75%
GLUC - GUZOF
10%
Poorly correlated
-2.50%
GPDNF - GUZOF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GPAGF - GUZOF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

HLNFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that HLNFF and GPAGF have been poorly correlated (+15% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HLNFF and GPAGF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HLNFF
1D Price
Change %
HLNFF100%
N/A
GPAGF - HLNFF
15%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KRYAF - HLNFF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GLAPF - HLNFF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GLAPY - HLNFF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GUZOF - HLNFF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More