Advertisement
GURE vs LIN
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GURE is a Hold and LIN is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
GURE’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileLIN’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- GURE’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- LIN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
GURE’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LIN’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
- GURE’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
- LIN’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
GURE (@Chemicals: Major Diversified) experienced а +2.04% price change this week, while LIN (@Chemicals: Specialty) price change was +1.35% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Chemicals: Major Diversified industry was +3.12%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.89%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.88%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Chemicals: Specialty industry was +1.81%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.47%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.31%.
Reported Earning Dates
LIN is expected to report earnings on Feb 05, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Chemicals: Major Diversified (+3.12% weekly)The major diversified chemicals industry includes companies that produce a wide range of chemicals and industrial gases. The products are often used as raw materials in the manufacturing of various types of goods, including plastics, paints, carpets, and fixtures to name a few. Major companies making diversified chemicals include DuPont de Nemours Inc., Celanese Corporation, Celanese Corporation and Westlake Chemical Corporation.
@Chemicals: Specialty (+1.81% weekly)The specialty chemicals sector includes companies that produce chemicals and industrial gases, which are of relatively high-value, often made to customer specifications. Examples of specialty chemicals are electronic chemicals, industrial gases, coatings, adhesives and sealants, industrial and institutional cleaning chemicals. The products are often valued on the basis of their purposes/performances rather than for their composition. Linde Plc, Ecolab Inc., Air Products and Chemicals, Inc., and Dow, Inc. are some of the largest companies making specialty chemicals.
| GURE | LIN | GURE / LIN | |
| Capitalization | 6.16M | 205B | 0% |
| EBITDA | -37.43M | 13.3B | -0% |
| Gain YTD | 8.108 | 3.187 | 254% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | 29.45 | - |
| Revenue | 20.7M | 33.5B | 0% |
| Total Cash | 5.82M | 4.51B | 0% |
| Total Debt | 8.06M | 25.9B | 0% |
GURE | LIN | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 8 | 23 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 65 Fair valued | 80 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 20 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 97 | 49 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 88 | 54 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 73 | 64 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
GURE's Valuation (65) in the Chemicals Specialty industry is in the same range as LIN (80). This means that GURE’s stock grew similarly to LIN’s over the last 12 months.
LIN's Profit vs Risk Rating (20) in the Chemicals Specialty industry is significantly better than the same rating for GURE (100). This means that LIN’s stock grew significantly faster than GURE’s over the last 12 months.
LIN's SMR Rating (49) in the Chemicals Specialty industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GURE (97). This means that LIN’s stock grew somewhat faster than GURE’s over the last 12 months.
LIN's Price Growth Rating (54) in the Chemicals Specialty industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GURE (88). This means that LIN’s stock grew somewhat faster than GURE’s over the last 12 months.
LIN's P/E Growth Rating (64) in the Chemicals Specialty industry is in the same range as GURE (73). This means that LIN’s stock grew similarly to GURE’s over the last 12 months.
| GURE | LIN | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 90% | 1 day ago 48% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 89% | 1 day ago 32% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 73% | 1 day ago 59% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 71% | 1 day ago 50% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 74% | 1 day ago 48% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 89% | 1 day ago 45% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 79% | 7 days ago 47% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 1 day ago 48% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 29% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 86% | 1 day ago 35% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| FLOW | 37.05 | 0.11 | +0.29% |
| Global X U.S. Cash Flow Kings 100 ETF | |||
| QUVU | 28.02 | 0.06 | +0.23% |
| Hartford Quality Value ETF | |||
| CGDV | 44.32 | -0.12 | -0.27% |
| Capital Group Dividend Value ETF | |||
| PNQI | 53.04 | -0.83 | -1.54% |
| Invesco NASDAQ Internet ETF | |||
| QQQP | 177.67 | -3.92 | -2.16% |
| Tradr 2X Long Innovation100 QuarterlyETF | |||
GURE and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that GURE and IRLCF have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GURE and IRLCF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GURE | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GURE | 100% | N/A | ||
| IRLCF - GURE | 22% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| COOSF - GURE | 21% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| SSL - GURE | 21% Poorly correlated | +5.23% | ||
| ALB - GURE | 13% Poorly correlated | +0.38% | ||
| LIN - GURE | 9% Poorly correlated | -0.66% | ||
More | ||||
LIN and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LIN has been loosely correlated with RPM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LIN jumps, then RPM could also see price increases.