GUNGF
Price
$17.34
Change
-$2.76 (-13.73%)
Updated
Mar 19 closing price
Capitalization
1.19B
MAPPF
Price
$0.09
Change
+$0.01 (+12.50%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
30.1M
Interact to see
Advertisement

GUNGF vs MAPPF

Header iconGUNGF vs MAPPF Comparison
Open Charts GUNGF vs MAPPFBanner chart's image
Gungho Online Entertainment
Price$17.34
Change-$2.76 (-13.73%)
Volume$1
Capitalization1.19B
PROSTAR
Price$0.09
Change+$0.01 (+12.50%)
Volume$101.4K
Capitalization30.1M
GUNGF vs MAPPF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
GUNGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MAPPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GUNGF vs. MAPPF commentary
Jul 01, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GUNGF is a Hold and MAPPF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 01, 2025
Stock price -- (GUNGF: $17.34 vs. MAPPF: $0.09)
Brand notoriety: GUNGF and MAPPF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GUNGF: 100% vs. MAPPF: 157%
Market capitalization -- GUNGF: $1.19B vs. MAPPF: $30.1M
GUNGF [@Packaged Software] is valued at $1.19B. MAPPF’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $30.1M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $3.15T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $12.72B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GUNGF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMAPPF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • GUNGF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • MAPPF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, GUNGF is a better buy in the long-term than MAPPF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GUNGF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MAPPF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GUNGF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 0 bearish.
  • MAPPF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GUNGF is a better buy in the short-term than MAPPF.

Price Growth

GUNGF (@Packaged Software) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while MAPPF (@Packaged Software) price change was -1.01% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +3.75%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.06%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.66%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (+3.75% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GUNGF($1.19B) has a higher market cap than MAPPF($30.1M). MAPPF YTD gains are higher at: -7.338 vs. GUNGF (-13.731). GUNGF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 29.9B vs. MAPPF (-4.77M). GUNGF has more cash in the bank: 125B vs. MAPPF (1.17M). MAPPF has less debt than GUNGF: MAPPF (192K) vs GUNGF (610M). GUNGF has higher revenues than MAPPF: GUNGF (112B) vs MAPPF (799K).
GUNGFMAPPFGUNGF / MAPPF
Capitalization1.19B30.1M3,944%
EBITDA29.9B-4.77M-626,504%
Gain YTD-13.731-7.338187%
P/E Ratio8.39N/A-
Revenue112B799K14,017,522%
Total Cash125B1.17M10,647,359%
Total Debt610M192K317,708%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GUNGF vs MAPPF: Fundamental Ratings
GUNGF
MAPPF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
8
Undervalued
77
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
7385
SMR RATING
1..100
48100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7461
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1495
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

GUNGF's Valuation (8) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for MAPPF (77). This means that GUNGF’s stock grew significantly faster than MAPPF’s over the last 12 months.

GUNGF's Profit vs Risk Rating (73) in the null industry is in the same range as MAPPF (85). This means that GUNGF’s stock grew similarly to MAPPF’s over the last 12 months.

GUNGF's SMR Rating (48) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MAPPF (100). This means that GUNGF’s stock grew somewhat faster than MAPPF’s over the last 12 months.

MAPPF's Price Growth Rating (61) in the null industry is in the same range as GUNGF (74). This means that MAPPF’s stock grew similarly to GUNGF’s over the last 12 months.

GUNGF's P/E Growth Rating (14) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for MAPPF (95). This means that GUNGF’s stock grew significantly faster than MAPPF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GUNGFMAPPF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
87%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
80%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
14%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
87%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
14%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
88%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
83%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GUNGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MAPPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GSUKX20.610.16
+0.80%
Goldman Sachs International Eq Inc R6
GTORX39.460.23
+0.59%
Goldman Sachs Technology Opps R6
DRLYX8.500.02
+0.24%
BNY Mellon Developed Markets RE Scs - Y
JHQRX33.200.07
+0.21%
JPMorgan Hedged Equity R6
RYDVX6.17-0.01
-0.16%
Royce Dividend Value Svc

GUNGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GUNGF has been loosely correlated with RDWR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 37% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GUNGF jumps, then RDWR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GUNGF
1D Price
Change %
GUNGF100%
N/A
RDWR - GUNGF
37%
Loosely correlated
+0.14%
CWAN - GUNGF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MKTDF - GUNGF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IDCC - GUNGF
23%
Poorly correlated
+1.61%
WFCF - GUNGF
23%
Poorly correlated
+1.85%
More

MAPPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MAPPF and GUNGF have been poorly correlated (+11% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MAPPF and GUNGF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MAPPF
1D Price
Change %
MAPPF100%
+11.06%
GUNGF - MAPPF
11%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BMBL - MAPPF
7%
Poorly correlated
-1.07%
ONTF - MAPPF
7%
Poorly correlated
+0.18%
SRCO - MAPPF
7%
Poorly correlated
+3.00%
OWLT - MAPPF
5%
Poorly correlated
+2.20%
More