Advertisement
GUNGF vs MAPPF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GUNGF is a Hold and MAPPF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
GUNGF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMAPPF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- GUNGF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- MAPPF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
GUNGF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MAPPF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- GUNGF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 1 bearish.
- MAPPF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 2 bearish.
Price Growth
GUNGF (@Packaged Software) experienced а +21.97% price change this week, while MAPPF (@Packaged Software) price change was -9.40% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +5.54%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.70%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.56%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Packaged Software (+5.54% weekly)Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
| GUNGF | MAPPF | GUNGF / MAPPF | |
| Capitalization | 1.19B | 30.1M | 3,944% |
| EBITDA | 29.9B | -4.77M | -626,504% |
| Gain YTD | 5.224 | -15.094 | -35% |
| P/E Ratio | 8.39 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 112B | 799K | 14,017,522% |
| Total Cash | 125B | 1.17M | 10,647,359% |
| Total Debt | 610M | 192K | 317,708% |
GUNGF | MAPPF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 30 | 87 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 9 Undervalued | 77 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 66 | 86 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 48 | 100 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 76 | 76 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 8 | 94 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
GUNGF's Valuation (9) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for MAPPF (77). This means that GUNGF’s stock grew significantly faster than MAPPF’s over the last 12 months.
GUNGF's Profit vs Risk Rating (66) in the null industry is in the same range as MAPPF (86). This means that GUNGF’s stock grew similarly to MAPPF’s over the last 12 months.
GUNGF's SMR Rating (48) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MAPPF (100). This means that GUNGF’s stock grew somewhat faster than MAPPF’s over the last 12 months.
GUNGF's Price Growth Rating (76) in the null industry is in the same range as MAPPF (76). This means that GUNGF’s stock grew similarly to MAPPF’s over the last 12 months.
GUNGF's P/E Growth Rating (8) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for MAPPF (94). This means that GUNGF’s stock grew significantly faster than MAPPF’s over the last 12 months.
| GUNGF | MAPPF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 38% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 17% | 2 days ago 81% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 82% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 85% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 14% | 2 days ago 88% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 14% | 2 days ago 84% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 12 days ago 75% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 8 days ago 85% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 80% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 90% |
Advertisement
GUNGF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GUNGF has been loosely correlated with RDWR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 37% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GUNGF jumps, then RDWR could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GUNGF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GUNGF | 100% | N/A | ||
| RDWR - GUNGF | 37% Loosely correlated | -2.52% | ||
| CWAN - GUNGF | 26% Poorly correlated | +0.28% | ||
| MKTDF - GUNGF | 26% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| IDCC - GUNGF | 23% Poorly correlated | -0.00% | ||
| WFCF - GUNGF | 23% Poorly correlated | -0.99% | ||
More | ||||
MAPPF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that MAPPF and GUNGF have been poorly correlated (+11% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MAPPF and GUNGF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MAPPF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MAPPF | 100% | -5.81% | ||
| GUNGF - MAPPF | 11% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| BMBL - MAPPF | 7% Poorly correlated | +4.34% | ||
| ONTF - MAPPF | 7% Poorly correlated | -0.77% | ||
| SRCO - MAPPF | 7% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| OWLT - MAPPF | 5% Poorly correlated | +4.90% | ||
More | ||||