GTX
Price
$13.77
Change
+$0.19 (+1.40%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
2.78B
25 days until earnings call
PHIN
Price
$58.12
Change
+$0.47 (+0.82%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
2.26B
43 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

GTX vs PHIN

Header iconGTX vs PHIN Comparison
Open Charts GTX vs PHINBanner chart's image
Garrett Motion
Price$13.77
Change+$0.19 (+1.40%)
Volume$1.79M
Capitalization2.78B
PHINIA
Price$58.12
Change+$0.47 (+0.82%)
Volume$287.9K
Capitalization2.26B
GTX vs PHIN Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
GTX
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PHIN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GTX vs. PHIN commentary
Sep 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GTX is a StrongBuy and PHIN is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 29, 2025
Stock price -- (GTX: $13.77 vs. PHIN: $58.12)
Brand notoriety: GTX and PHIN are both not notable
Both companies represent the Auto Parts: OEM industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GTX: 52% vs. PHIN: 63%
Market capitalization -- GTX: $2.78B vs. PHIN: $2.26B
GTX [@Auto Parts: OEM] is valued at $2.78B. PHIN’s [@Auto Parts: OEM] market capitalization is $2.26B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry ranges from $90.03B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry is $6.58B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GTX’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whilePHIN’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • GTX’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • PHIN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, GTX is a better buy in the long-term than PHIN.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GTX’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PHIN’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GTX’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • PHIN’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both GTX and PHIN are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

GTX (@Auto Parts: OEM) experienced а +1.25% price change this week, while PHIN (@Auto Parts: OEM) price change was -0.68% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Auto Parts: OEM industry was -0.60%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.53%, and the average quarterly price growth was +32.70%.

Reported Earning Dates

GTX is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2025.

PHIN is expected to report earnings on Nov 10, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Auto Parts: OEM (-0.60% weekly)

OEM or Original Equipment Manufacturer of auto parts refers to the original producer of a vehicles components, and so OEM car parts are usually identical to the parts used in producing the vehicle in the first place. OEM parts tend to fit the specifications of a particular model, and their compatibility is often guaranteed by the automaker itself. OEM parts could be more expensive to buy (compared to other vendors’ products) when a consumer goes for replacement. However, increased competition from aftermarket parts/third-party vendors could, in some cases, keep EOM prices in check. The industry might progress further in adopting newer technologies like 3D printing to boost supply chain performance and quality. Aptiv PLC, Magna International Inc. and BorgWarner Inc. are major OEMs for autos.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GTX($2.78B) has a higher market cap than PHIN($2.26B). PHIN has higher P/E ratio than GTX: PHIN (22.44) vs GTX (9.70). GTX YTD gains are higher at: 55.063 vs. PHIN (22.668). GTX has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 574M vs. PHIN (452M). PHIN has more cash in the bank: 347M vs. GTX (232M). PHIN has less debt than GTX: PHIN (1.04B) vs GTX (1.52B). GTX (3.46B) and PHIN (3.36B) have equivalent revenues.
GTXPHINGTX / PHIN
Capitalization2.78B2.26B123%
EBITDA574M452M127%
Gain YTD55.06322.668243%
P/E Ratio9.7022.4443%
Revenue3.46B3.36B103%
Total Cash232M347M67%
Total Debt1.52B1.04B146%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GTX: Fundamental Ratings
GTX
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
32
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
31
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
39
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GTXPHIN
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
47%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
44%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
53%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
53%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
77%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
53%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GTX
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PHIN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FGDAX50.121.09
+2.22%
Fidelity Advisor Gold A
CSUIX24.980.22
+0.89%
Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure I
TMVIX24.400.19
+0.78%
Timothy Plan Large/Mid Cap Value I
PJDZX18.930.10
+0.53%
PGIM Jennison Rising Dividend Z
MGRVX48.710.03
+0.06%
MFS International Growth R4

GTX and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GTX has been loosely correlated with BWA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 46% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GTX jumps, then BWA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GTX
1D Price
Change %
GTX100%
+1.40%
BWA - GTX
46%
Loosely correlated
+1.47%
ALV - GTX
44%
Loosely correlated
+1.62%
APTV - GTX
42%
Loosely correlated
+1.77%
PHIN - GTX
41%
Loosely correlated
+0.82%
LEA - GTX
41%
Loosely correlated
+1.18%
More

PHIN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PHIN has been loosely correlated with BWA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 60% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PHIN jumps, then BWA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PHIN
1D Price
Change %
PHIN100%
+0.82%
BWA - PHIN
60%
Loosely correlated
+1.47%
VC - PHIN
60%
Loosely correlated
+2.11%
ALV - PHIN
58%
Loosely correlated
+1.62%
AXL - PHIN
58%
Loosely correlated
+0.49%
ATMU - PHIN
58%
Loosely correlated
+1.47%
More