GTX
Price
$16.75
Change
+$0.03 (+0.18%)
Updated
Dec 4, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
3.25B
76 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
MOD
Price
$159.74
Change
+$2.28 (+1.45%)
Updated
Dec 4, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
8.29B
62 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

GTX vs MOD

Header iconGTX vs MOD Comparison
Open Charts GTX vs MODBanner chart's image
Garrett Motion
Price$16.75
Change+$0.03 (+0.18%)
Volume$80.72K
Capitalization3.25B
Modine Manufacturing
Price$159.74
Change+$2.28 (+1.45%)
Volume$19.18K
Capitalization8.29B
GTX vs MOD Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GTX vs. MOD commentary
Dec 05, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GTX is a Hold and MOD is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 05, 2025
Stock price -- (GTX: $16.72 vs. MOD: $157.46)
Brand notoriety: GTX and MOD are both not notable
Both companies represent the Auto Parts: OEM industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GTX: 115% vs. MOD: 135%
Market capitalization -- GTX: $3.25B vs. MOD: $8.29B
GTX [@Auto Parts: OEM] is valued at $3.25B. MOD’s [@Auto Parts: OEM] market capitalization is $8.29B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry ranges from $83.24B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry is $6.51B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GTX’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileMOD’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • GTX’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • MOD’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both GTX and MOD are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GTX’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MOD’s TA Score has 8 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GTX’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • MOD’s TA Score: 8 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MOD is a better buy in the short-term than GTX.

Price Growth

GTX (@Auto Parts: OEM) experienced а +0.54% price change this week, while MOD (@Auto Parts: OEM) price change was -0.95% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Auto Parts: OEM industry was +1.11%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.47%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.12%.

Reported Earning Dates

GTX is expected to report earnings on Feb 18, 2026.

MOD is expected to report earnings on Feb 04, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Auto Parts: OEM (+1.11% weekly)

OEM or Original Equipment Manufacturer of auto parts refers to the original producer of a vehicles components, and so OEM car parts are usually identical to the parts used in producing the vehicle in the first place. OEM parts tend to fit the specifications of a particular model, and their compatibility is often guaranteed by the automaker itself. OEM parts could be more expensive to buy (compared to other vendors’ products) when a consumer goes for replacement. However, increased competition from aftermarket parts/third-party vendors could, in some cases, keep EOM prices in check. The industry might progress further in adopting newer technologies like 3D printing to boost supply chain performance and quality. Aptiv PLC, Magna International Inc. and BorgWarner Inc. are major OEMs for autos.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MOD($8.29B) has a higher market cap than GTX($3.25B). MOD has higher P/E ratio than GTX: MOD (45.38) vs GTX (10.72). GTX YTD gains are higher at: 88.283 vs. MOD (35.823). GTX has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 574M vs. MOD (355M). GTX has more cash in the bank: 232M vs. MOD (124M). MOD has less debt than GTX: MOD (527M) vs GTX (1.52B). GTX has higher revenues than MOD: GTX (3.46B) vs MOD (2.61B).
GTXMODGTX / MOD
Capitalization3.25B8.29B39%
EBITDA574M355M162%
Gain YTD88.28335.823246%
P/E Ratio10.7245.3824%
Revenue3.46B2.61B133%
Total Cash232M124M187%
Total Debt1.52B527M289%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GTX vs MOD: Fundamental Ratings
GTX
MOD
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6717
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
29
Undervalued
84
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
522
SMR RATING
1..100
10043
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3840
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1242
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

GTX's Valuation (29) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MOD (84) in the Auto Parts OEM industry. This means that GTX’s stock grew somewhat faster than MOD’s over the last 12 months.

GTX's Profit vs Risk Rating (5) in the null industry is in the same range as MOD (22) in the Auto Parts OEM industry. This means that GTX’s stock grew similarly to MOD’s over the last 12 months.

MOD's SMR Rating (43) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GTX (100) in the null industry. This means that MOD’s stock grew somewhat faster than GTX’s over the last 12 months.

GTX's Price Growth Rating (38) in the null industry is in the same range as MOD (40) in the Auto Parts OEM industry. This means that GTX’s stock grew similarly to MOD’s over the last 12 months.

GTX's P/E Growth Rating (12) in the null industry is in the same range as MOD (42) in the Auto Parts OEM industry. This means that GTX’s stock grew similarly to MOD’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GTXMOD
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
82%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 22 days ago
73%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GTX
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MOD
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FRDRX99.060.51
+0.52%
Franklin Rising Dividends R
VCSTX40.530.13
+0.32%
VALIC Company I Science & Technology
IFTSX12.76N/A
N/A
Voya International High Div Low Vol S
PFPGX31.17N/A
N/A
Parnassus Growth Equity Institutional
BIVIX17.42-0.01
-0.06%
Invenomic Institutional

GTX and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GTX has been loosely correlated with THRM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 40% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GTX jumps, then THRM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GTX
1D Price
Change %
GTX100%
+1.58%
THRM - GTX
40%
Loosely correlated
+2.86%
PHIN - GTX
39%
Loosely correlated
+0.35%
BWA - GTX
39%
Loosely correlated
-0.02%
LEA - GTX
36%
Loosely correlated
+1.33%
MOD - GTX
36%
Loosely correlated
-1.86%
More

MOD and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MOD has been loosely correlated with ATMU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MOD jumps, then ATMU could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MOD
1D Price
Change %
MOD100%
-1.86%
ATMU - MOD
54%
Loosely correlated
+1.24%
ALSN - MOD
51%
Loosely correlated
+1.34%
PHIN - MOD
44%
Loosely correlated
+0.35%
DNZOY - MOD
42%
Loosely correlated
-0.31%
BRDCY - MOD
39%
Loosely correlated
+0.77%
More