GTX
Price
$11.00
Change
+$0.01 (+0.09%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
2.37B
18 days until earnings call
MGA
Price
$41.62
Change
-$0.13 (-0.31%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
15.65B
26 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

GTX vs MGA

Header iconGTX vs MGA Comparison
Open Charts GTX vs MGABanner chart's image
Garrett Motion
Price$11.00
Change+$0.01 (+0.09%)
Volume$1.15M
Capitalization2.37B
Magna International
Price$41.62
Change-$0.13 (-0.31%)
Volume$832.04K
Capitalization15.65B
GTX vs MGA Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
GTX
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MGA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GTX vs. MGA commentary
Jul 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GTX is a Buy and MGA is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 06, 2025
Stock price -- (GTX: $11.00 vs. MGA: $41.62)
Brand notoriety: GTX and MGA are both not notable
Both companies represent the Auto Parts: OEM industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GTX: 43% vs. MGA: 49%
Market capitalization -- GTX: $2.37B vs. MGA: $15.65B
GTX [@Auto Parts: OEM] is valued at $2.37B. MGA’s [@Auto Parts: OEM] market capitalization is $15.65B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry ranges from $52.56B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry is $5.73B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GTX’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMGA’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • GTX’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • MGA’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, GTX is a better buy in the long-term than MGA.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GTX’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MGA’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GTX’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • MGA’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MGA is a better buy in the short-term than GTX.

Price Growth

GTX (@Auto Parts: OEM) experienced а +6.90% price change this week, while MGA (@Auto Parts: OEM) price change was +8.73% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Auto Parts: OEM industry was +3.35%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.14%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.37%.

Reported Earning Dates

GTX is expected to report earnings on Jul 24, 2025.

MGA is expected to report earnings on Aug 01, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Auto Parts: OEM (+3.35% weekly)

OEM or Original Equipment Manufacturer of auto parts refers to the original producer of a vehicles components, and so OEM car parts are usually identical to the parts used in producing the vehicle in the first place. OEM parts tend to fit the specifications of a particular model, and their compatibility is often guaranteed by the automaker itself. OEM parts could be more expensive to buy (compared to other vendors’ products) when a consumer goes for replacement. However, increased competition from aftermarket parts/third-party vendors could, in some cases, keep EOM prices in check. The industry might progress further in adopting newer technologies like 3D printing to boost supply chain performance and quality. Aptiv PLC, Magna International Inc. and BorgWarner Inc. are major OEMs for autos.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MGA($15.7B) has a higher market cap than GTX($2.37B). MGA has higher P/E ratio than GTX: MGA (12.61) vs GTX (10.19). GTX YTD gains are higher at: 23.298 vs. MGA (2.272). MGA has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 3.6B vs. GTX (600M). MGA has more cash in the bank: 1.2B vs. GTX (259M). GTX has less debt than MGA: GTX (1.69B) vs MGA (7.22B). MGA has higher revenues than GTX: MGA (42.8B) vs GTX (3.89B).
GTXMGAGTX / MGA
Capitalization2.37B15.7B15%
EBITDA600M3.6B17%
Gain YTD23.2982.2721,025%
P/E Ratio10.1912.6181%
Revenue3.89B42.8B9%
Total Cash259M1.2B22%
Total Debt1.69B7.22B23%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GTX vs MGA: Fundamental Ratings
GTX
MGA
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
30
Undervalued
8
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5096
SMR RATING
1..100
10069
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4145
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
872
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MGA's Valuation (8) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is in the same range as GTX (30) in the null industry. This means that MGA’s stock grew similarly to GTX’s over the last 12 months.

GTX's Profit vs Risk Rating (50) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MGA (96) in the Auto Parts OEM industry. This means that GTX’s stock grew somewhat faster than MGA’s over the last 12 months.

MGA's SMR Rating (69) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is in the same range as GTX (100) in the null industry. This means that MGA’s stock grew similarly to GTX’s over the last 12 months.

GTX's Price Growth Rating (41) in the null industry is in the same range as MGA (45) in the Auto Parts OEM industry. This means that GTX’s stock grew similarly to MGA’s over the last 12 months.

GTX's P/E Growth Rating (8) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MGA (72) in the Auto Parts OEM industry. This means that GTX’s stock grew somewhat faster than MGA’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GTXMGA
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
73%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GTX
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MGA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HSLAX38.150.44
+1.17%
Hartford Small Cap Growth A
ESGYX21.590.15
+0.70%
Mirova Global Megatrends Y
HDGIX35.060.18
+0.52%
Hartford Dividend and Growth I
WCMJX11.600.06
+0.52%
WCM SMID Quality Val Fd Investor
UIISX18.560.07
+0.38%
Victory Income Stock Institutional

GTX and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GTX has been loosely correlated with LKQ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 48% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GTX jumps, then LKQ could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GTX
1D Price
Change %
GTX100%
+0.09%
LKQ - GTX
48%
Loosely correlated
+0.29%
BWA - GTX
46%
Loosely correlated
-0.62%
LEA - GTX
43%
Loosely correlated
+0.37%
ALV - GTX
42%
Loosely correlated
-0.51%
MGA - GTX
40%
Loosely correlated
-0.31%
More

MGA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MGA has been closely correlated with LEA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MGA jumps, then LEA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MGA
1D Price
Change %
MGA100%
-0.31%
LEA - MGA
81%
Closely correlated
+0.37%
VC - MGA
74%
Closely correlated
+0.52%
ADNT - MGA
72%
Closely correlated
+0.90%
BWA - MGA
70%
Closely correlated
-0.62%
ALV - MGA
70%
Closely correlated
-0.51%
More