GTX
Price
$10.31
Change
-$0.15 (-1.43%)
Updated
Jun 13 closing price
Capitalization
2.37B
40 days until earnings call
LKQ
Price
$38.12
Change
-$0.92 (-2.36%)
Updated
Jun 13 closing price
Capitalization
14.24B
40 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

GTX vs LKQ

Header iconGTX vs LKQ Comparison
Open Charts GTX vs LKQBanner chart's image
Garrett Motion
Price$10.31
Change-$0.15 (-1.43%)
Volume$1.05M
Capitalization2.37B
LKQ
Price$38.12
Change-$0.92 (-2.36%)
Volume$1.34M
Capitalization14.24B
GTX vs LKQ Comparison Chart
Loading...
GTX
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LKQ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GTX vs. LKQ commentary
Jun 14, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GTX is a Hold and LKQ is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 14, 2025
Stock price -- (GTX: $10.31 vs. LKQ: $38.12)
Brand notoriety: GTX and LKQ are both not notable
Both companies represent the Auto Parts: OEM industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GTX: 46% vs. LKQ: 61%
Market capitalization -- GTX: $2.37B vs. LKQ: $14.24B
GTX [@Auto Parts: OEM] is valued at $2.37B. LKQ’s [@Auto Parts: OEM] market capitalization is $14.24B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry ranges from $52.56B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry is $5.62B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GTX’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileLKQ’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • GTX’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • LKQ’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, LKQ is a better buy in the long-term than GTX.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GTX’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LKQ’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GTX’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • LKQ’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both GTX and LKQ are a bad buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

GTX (@Auto Parts: OEM) experienced а +1.18% price change this week, while LKQ (@Auto Parts: OEM) price change was -2.48% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Auto Parts: OEM industry was +0.27%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.01%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.90%.

Reported Earning Dates

GTX is expected to report earnings on Jul 24, 2025.

LKQ is expected to report earnings on Jul 24, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Auto Parts: OEM (+0.27% weekly)

OEM or Original Equipment Manufacturer of auto parts refers to the original producer of a vehicles components, and so OEM car parts are usually identical to the parts used in producing the vehicle in the first place. OEM parts tend to fit the specifications of a particular model, and their compatibility is often guaranteed by the automaker itself. OEM parts could be more expensive to buy (compared to other vendors’ products) when a consumer goes for replacement. However, increased competition from aftermarket parts/third-party vendors could, in some cases, keep EOM prices in check. The industry might progress further in adopting newer technologies like 3D printing to boost supply chain performance and quality. Aptiv PLC, Magna International Inc. and BorgWarner Inc. are major OEMs for autos.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LKQ($14.2B) has a higher market cap than GTX($2.37B). LKQ has higher P/E ratio than GTX: LKQ (15.10) vs GTX (10.19). GTX YTD gains are higher at: 15.564 vs. LKQ (5.216). LKQ has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.77B vs. GTX (600M). LKQ has more cash in the bank: 299M vs. GTX (259M). GTX has less debt than LKQ: GTX (1.69B) vs LKQ (5.64B). LKQ has higher revenues than GTX: LKQ (13.9B) vs GTX (3.89B).
GTXLKQGTX / LKQ
Capitalization2.37B14.2B17%
EBITDA600M1.77B34%
Gain YTD15.5645.216298%
P/E Ratio10.1915.1067%
Revenue3.89B13.9B28%
Total Cash259M299M87%
Total Debt1.69B5.64B30%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GTX vs LKQ: Fundamental Ratings
GTX
LKQ
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5569
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
28
Undervalued
21
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4250
SMR RATING
1..100
10064
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5160
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
944
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LKQ's Valuation (21) in the Automotive Aftermarket industry is in the same range as GTX (28) in the null industry. This means that LKQ’s stock grew similarly to GTX’s over the last 12 months.

GTX's Profit vs Risk Rating (42) in the null industry is in the same range as LKQ (50) in the Automotive Aftermarket industry. This means that GTX’s stock grew similarly to LKQ’s over the last 12 months.

LKQ's SMR Rating (64) in the Automotive Aftermarket industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GTX (100) in the null industry. This means that LKQ’s stock grew somewhat faster than GTX’s over the last 12 months.

GTX's Price Growth Rating (51) in the null industry is in the same range as LKQ (60) in the Automotive Aftermarket industry. This means that GTX’s stock grew similarly to LKQ’s over the last 12 months.

GTX's P/E Growth Rating (9) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LKQ (44) in the Automotive Aftermarket industry. This means that GTX’s stock grew somewhat faster than LKQ’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GTXLKQ
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
56%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 25 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GTX
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LKQ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CCJ66.660.52
+0.79%
Cameco Corp
SEAT1.79-0.01
-0.56%
Vivid Seats
SPT20.30-0.49
-2.36%
Sprout Social
GURE0.57-0.03
-4.73%
Gulf Resources
STRS18.56-1.39
-6.97%
Stratus Properties

GTX and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GTX has been loosely correlated with LKQ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GTX jumps, then LKQ could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GTX
1D Price
Change %
GTX100%
-1.43%
LKQ - GTX
47%
Loosely correlated
-2.36%
BWA - GTX
46%
Loosely correlated
-0.93%
LEA - GTX
43%
Loosely correlated
-3.20%
ALV - GTX
43%
Loosely correlated
-1.28%
PHIN - GTX
40%
Loosely correlated
-3.93%
More

LKQ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LKQ has been loosely correlated with HLRD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LKQ jumps, then HLRD could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LKQ
1D Price
Change %
LKQ100%
-2.36%
HLRD - LKQ
53%
Loosely correlated
N/A
GTX - LKQ
48%
Loosely correlated
-1.43%
THRM - LKQ
44%
Loosely correlated
-2.76%
AXL - LKQ
41%
Loosely correlated
-6.76%
BWA - LKQ
40%
Loosely correlated
-0.93%
More