GTX
Price
$13.77
Change
+$0.19 (+1.40%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
2.78B
25 days until earnings call
LEA
Price
$101.44
Change
+$1.18 (+1.18%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
5.4B
37 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

GTX vs LEA

Header iconGTX vs LEA Comparison
Open Charts GTX vs LEABanner chart's image
Garrett Motion
Price$13.77
Change+$0.19 (+1.40%)
Volume$1.79M
Capitalization2.78B
Lear
Price$101.44
Change+$1.18 (+1.18%)
Volume$887.39K
Capitalization5.4B
GTX vs LEA Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
GTX
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LEA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GTX vs. LEA commentary
Sep 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GTX is a StrongBuy and LEA is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 29, 2025
Stock price -- (GTX: $13.77 vs. LEA: $101.44)
Brand notoriety: GTX and LEA are both not notable
Both companies represent the Auto Parts: OEM industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GTX: 52% vs. LEA: 129%
Market capitalization -- GTX: $2.78B vs. LEA: $5.4B
GTX [@Auto Parts: OEM] is valued at $2.78B. LEA’s [@Auto Parts: OEM] market capitalization is $5.4B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry ranges from $90.03B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry is $6.58B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GTX’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileLEA’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • GTX’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • LEA’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, GTX is a better buy in the long-term than LEA.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GTX’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LEA’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GTX’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • LEA’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LEA is a better buy in the short-term than GTX.

Price Growth

GTX (@Auto Parts: OEM) experienced а +1.25% price change this week, while LEA (@Auto Parts: OEM) price change was -3.70% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Auto Parts: OEM industry was -0.60%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.53%, and the average quarterly price growth was +32.70%.

Reported Earning Dates

GTX is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2025.

LEA is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Auto Parts: OEM (-0.60% weekly)

OEM or Original Equipment Manufacturer of auto parts refers to the original producer of a vehicles components, and so OEM car parts are usually identical to the parts used in producing the vehicle in the first place. OEM parts tend to fit the specifications of a particular model, and their compatibility is often guaranteed by the automaker itself. OEM parts could be more expensive to buy (compared to other vendors’ products) when a consumer goes for replacement. However, increased competition from aftermarket parts/third-party vendors could, in some cases, keep EOM prices in check. The industry might progress further in adopting newer technologies like 3D printing to boost supply chain performance and quality. Aptiv PLC, Magna International Inc. and BorgWarner Inc. are major OEMs for autos.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LEA($5.4B) has a higher market cap than GTX($2.78B). LEA has higher P/E ratio than GTX: LEA (14.35) vs GTX (9.70). GTX YTD gains are higher at: 55.063 vs. LEA (9.720). LEA has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.26B vs. GTX (574M). LEA has more cash in the bank: 888M vs. GTX (232M). GTX has less debt than LEA: GTX (1.52B) vs LEA (2.79B). LEA has higher revenues than GTX: LEA (17.3B) vs GTX (3.46B).
GTXLEAGTX / LEA
Capitalization2.78B5.4B51%
EBITDA574M1.26B45%
Gain YTD55.0639.720567%
P/E Ratio9.7014.3568%
Revenue3.46B17.3B20%
Total Cash232M888M26%
Total Debt1.52B2.79B55%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GTX vs LEA: Fundamental Ratings
GTX
LEA
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3267
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
31
Undervalued
19
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6100
SMR RATING
1..100
10077
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3956
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
727
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LEA's Valuation (19) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is in the same range as GTX (31) in the null industry. This means that LEA’s stock grew similarly to GTX’s over the last 12 months.

GTX's Profit vs Risk Rating (6) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for LEA (100) in the Auto Parts OEM industry. This means that GTX’s stock grew significantly faster than LEA’s over the last 12 months.

LEA's SMR Rating (77) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is in the same range as GTX (100) in the null industry. This means that LEA’s stock grew similarly to GTX’s over the last 12 months.

GTX's Price Growth Rating (39) in the null industry is in the same range as LEA (56) in the Auto Parts OEM industry. This means that GTX’s stock grew similarly to LEA’s over the last 12 months.

GTX's P/E Growth Rating (7) in the null industry is in the same range as LEA (27) in the Auto Parts OEM industry. This means that GTX’s stock grew similarly to LEA’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GTXLEA
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
80%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
65%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
68%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
55%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GTX
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LEA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
UPMMX40.540.79
+1.99%
Victory Precious Metals & Minerals Cl A
RYCFX44.730.66
+1.50%
Rydex Biotechnology C
PJSQX24.660.31
+1.27%
PGIM Jennison Small Company R6
MISGX13.010.11
+0.85%
Meridian Small Cap Growth Investor
FRDPX97.960.56
+0.57%
Franklin Rising Dividends A

GTX and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GTX has been loosely correlated with BWA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 46% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GTX jumps, then BWA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GTX
1D Price
Change %
GTX100%
+1.40%
BWA - GTX
46%
Loosely correlated
+1.47%
ALV - GTX
44%
Loosely correlated
+1.62%
APTV - GTX
42%
Loosely correlated
+1.77%
PHIN - GTX
41%
Loosely correlated
+0.82%
LEA - GTX
41%
Loosely correlated
+1.18%
More

LEA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LEA has been closely correlated with ADNT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LEA jumps, then ADNT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LEA
1D Price
Change %
LEA100%
+1.18%
ADNT - LEA
79%
Closely correlated
-0.28%
VC - LEA
78%
Closely correlated
+2.11%
MGA - LEA
77%
Closely correlated
+0.13%
BWA - LEA
76%
Closely correlated
+1.47%
ALV - LEA
70%
Closely correlated
+1.62%
More