GTWCF
Price
$0.96
Change
+$0.06 (+6.67%)
Updated
Dec 29 closing price
Capitalization
2.89B
NEN
Price
$73.24
Change
+$0.20 (+0.27%)
Updated
Jul 2 closing price
Capitalization
253.05M
Interact to see
Advertisement

GTWCF vs NEN

Header iconGTWCF vs NEN Comparison
Open Charts GTWCF vs NENBanner chart's image
Greentown China Holdings
Price$0.96
Change+$0.06 (+6.67%)
Volume$10.56K
Capitalization2.89B
New England Realty Associates
Price$73.24
Change+$0.20 (+0.27%)
Volume$728
Capitalization253.05M
GTWCF vs NEN Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
NEN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GTWCF vs. NEN commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GTWCF is a Hold and NEN is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (GTWCF: $0.96 vs. NEN: $73.24)
Brand notoriety: GTWCF and NEN are both not notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Development industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GTWCF: 100% vs. NEN: 58%
Market capitalization -- GTWCF: $2.89B vs. NEN: $253.05M
GTWCF [@Real Estate Development] is valued at $2.89B. NEN’s [@Real Estate Development] market capitalization is $253.05M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Development] industry ranges from $165.37B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Development] industry is $5.49B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GTWCF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileNEN’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • GTWCF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • NEN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, NEN is a better buy in the long-term than GTWCF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

NEN’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • NEN’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 2 bearish.

Price Growth

GTWCF (@Real Estate Development) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while NEN (@Real Estate Development) price change was +0.30% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Development industry was +31.49%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +35.48%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.93%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Development (+31.49% weekly)

Activities range from the renovation and re-lease of existing buildings to the purchase of raw land and the sale of developed land or parcels to others. Demand for land development business is driven by GDP growth, employment rates, interest rates, and access to/cost of capital. For individual companies in this industry, proper cost estimation and successful bidding play critical roles in their profitability. Large companies could potentially have greater access to capital, while smaller companies can specialize in a specific geographic area or market niche. CBRE Group, VICI Properties Inc and Brookfield Property Partners L.P. are some of the large companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GTWCF($2.89B) has a higher market cap than NEN($253M). NEN has higher P/E ratio than GTWCF: NEN (29.35) vs GTWCF (8.45). GTWCF YTD gains are higher at: 0.000 vs. NEN (-6.986). GTWCF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 15.5B vs. NEN (41M). GTWCF has more cash in the bank: 68.5B vs. NEN (103M). NEN has less debt than GTWCF: NEN (409M) vs GTWCF (128B). GTWCF has higher revenues than NEN: GTWCF (100B) vs NEN (74.5M).
GTWCFNENGTWCF / NEN
Capitalization2.89B253M1,142%
EBITDA15.5B41M37,805%
Gain YTD0.000-6.986-
P/E Ratio8.4529.3529%
Revenue100B74.5M134,228%
Total Cash68.5B103M66,505%
Total Debt128B409M31,296%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NEN: Fundamental Ratings
NEN
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
89
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
15
SMR RATING
1..100
52
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
61
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
91
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GTWCFNEN
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
58%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
40%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
33%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
40%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
6%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
38%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
6%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
36%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
46%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
34%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
NEN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CTASX38.860.64
+1.67%
Calamos Timpani Small Cap Growth A
FSAEX13.400.13
+0.98%
Fidelity Series All-Sector Equity
AICFX63.370.61
+0.97%
American Funds Invmt Co of Amer F1
SSRRX6.520.06
+0.93%
Touchstone Small Company R6
JACDX10.700.09
+0.85%
JHancock Global Environmental Opps R6

GTWCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GTWCF and NEN have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GTWCF and NEN's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GTWCF
1D Price
Change %
GTWCF100%
N/A
NEN - GTWCF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CHVKY - GTWCF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AZLCZ - GTWCF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DLMI - GTWCF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
VTAGY - GTWCF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

NEN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NEN and AMLLF have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NEN and AMLLF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NEN
1D Price
Change %
NEN100%
N/A
AMLLF - NEN
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RMR - NEN
23%
Poorly correlated
+1.74%
CWK - NEN
22%
Poorly correlated
+1.72%
HOUS - NEN
22%
Poorly correlated
+1.33%
STHO - NEN
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.13%
More