Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GTSFX vs WCMLX
GTSFX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts GTSFX vs WCMLX
Invesco Small Cap Growth R6
Price$41.28
Change-$0.30 (-0.72%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.67B
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$13.79
Change-$0.04 (-0.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets42.97M
GTSFX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GTSFX vs. WCMLX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GTSFX is a Hold and WCMLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GTSFX has more cash in the bank: 1.67B vs. WCMLX (43M). GTSFX (0.00) and WCMLX (0.00) have matching dividends . GTSFX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: GTSFX (13 years) vs WCMLX (6 years). WCMLX (1.79) is less costly to investors than GTSFX (0.75). WCMLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. GTSFX (55.00). WCMLX has a lower initial minimum investment than GTSFX: WCMLX (100000) vs GTSFX (1000000). GTSFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.90 vs. WCMLX (1.70). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : 12.48 vs. GTSFX (-21.40).
| GTSFX | WCMLX | GTSFX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 0.99 | 76% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 1.79 | 42% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.846 | 7.232 | 81% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 100000 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.67B | 43M | 3,893% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.90 | 1.70 | 289% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.05 | 33.88 | 109% |
| Returns for 5 years | -21.40 | 12.48 | -171% |
| Returns for 10 years | 6.26 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement