Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GTSFX vs WCMLX
GTSFX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts GTSFX vs WCMLX
Invesco Small Cap Growth R6
Price$40.69
Change-$0.79 (-1.90%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.68B
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$14.64
Change+$0.83 (+6.01%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets47.08M
GTSFX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GTSFX vs. WCMLX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GTSFX is a Hold and WCMLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GTSFX has more cash in the bank: 1.68B vs. WCMLX (47.1M). GTSFX (0.00) and WCMLX (0.00) have matching dividends . GTSFX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: GTSFX (13 years) vs WCMLX (6 years). WCMLX (1.79) is less costly to investors than GTSFX (0.75). WCMLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. GTSFX (55.00). WCMLX has a lower initial minimum investment than GTSFX: WCMLX (100000) vs GTSFX (1000000). WCMLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.52 vs. GTSFX (1.98). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : -5.30 vs. GTSFX (-34.93).
| GTSFX | WCMLX | GTSFX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 0.99 | 76% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 1.79 | 42% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.964 | 6.395 | 93% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 100000 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.68B | 47.1M | 3,569% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.98 | 8.52 | 23% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.57 | 19.51 | 121% |
| Returns for 5 years | -34.93 | -5.30 | 659% |
| Returns for 10 years | 32.79 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement