GTMLF
Price
$0.02
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Aug 26 closing price
Capitalization
10.85M
USREF
Price
$0.56
Change
-$0.02 (-3.45%)
Updated
Aug 29 closing price
Capitalization
18.62M
Interact to see
Advertisement

GTMLF vs USREF

Header iconGTMLF vs USREF Comparison
Open Charts GTMLF vs USREFBanner chart's image
GREEN TECHNOLOGY METALS
Price$0.02
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$25K
Capitalization10.85M
TACTICAL RES
Price$0.56
Change-$0.02 (-3.45%)
Volume$1.97K
Capitalization18.62M
GTMLF vs USREF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
GTMLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
USREF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GTMLF vs. USREF commentary
Sep 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GTMLF is a Hold and USREF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 08, 2025
Stock price -- (GTMLF: $0.02 vs. USREF: $0.56)
Brand notoriety: GTMLF and USREF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GTMLF: 39% vs. USREF: 29%
Market capitalization -- GTMLF: $10.85M vs. USREF: $18.62M
GTMLF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $10.85M. USREF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $18.62M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.29B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GTMLF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileUSREF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • GTMLF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • USREF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, GTMLF is a better buy in the long-term than USREF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GTMLF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while USREF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GTMLF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • USREF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GTMLF is a better buy in the short-term than USREF.

Price Growth

GTMLF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while USREF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +4.20%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.25%, and the average quarterly price growth was +55.53%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+4.20% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
USREF($18.6M) has a higher market cap than GTMLF($10.8M). USREF YTD gains are higher at: 2151.000 vs. GTMLF (-57.606). GTMLF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -2.01M vs. USREF (-7.6M).
GTMLFUSREFGTMLF / USREF
Capitalization10.8M18.6M58%
EBITDA-2.01M-7.6M26%
Gain YTD-57.6062151.000-3%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
RevenueN/A0-
Total CashN/A268K-
Total DebtN/A643K-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GTMLFUSREF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
80%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 21 days ago
88%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
17%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GTMLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
USREF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CANQF0.01N/A
N/A
CanaQuest Medical Corporation
MCAP11.25N/A
N/A
MCAP Inc.
TBLMF18.00N/A
N/A
Tiger Brands Ltd.
BDOUY24.09-0.08
-0.33%
BDO Unibank Inc.
PNCKF0.36N/A
-1.10%
Galleon Gold Corp.

GTMLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GTMLF and HRFEF have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GTMLF and HRFEF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GTMLF
1D Price
Change %
GTMLF100%
N/A
HRFEF - GTMLF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ANSNF - GTMLF
23%
Poorly correlated
-12.73%
MGMNF - GTMLF
13%
Poorly correlated
-1.81%
BMVVF - GTMLF
11%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NWCBF - GTMLF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

USREF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that USREF and HUSIF have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that USREF and HUSIF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To USREF
1D Price
Change %
USREF100%
N/A
HUSIF - USREF
25%
Poorly correlated
+3.97%
GLNLF - USREF
6%
Poorly correlated
+9.09%
LLLAF - USREF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GEODF - USREF
4%
Poorly correlated
+3.84%
GTMLF - USREF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More