GTMAY
Price
$1.38
Change
+$0.03 (+2.22%)
Updated
Oct 3 closing price
Capitalization
59.93M
28 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
IRCUF
Price
$6.70
Change
-$0.02 (-0.30%)
Updated
Oct 3 closing price
Capitalization
1.12B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

GTMAY vs IRCUF

Header iconGTMAY vs IRCUF Comparison
Open Charts GTMAY vs IRCUFBanner chart's image
Grupo TMM S.A.B
Price$1.38
Change+$0.03 (+2.22%)
Volume$2.6K
Capitalization59.93M
Irish Continental Group
Price$6.70
Change-$0.02 (-0.30%)
Volume$30.26K
Capitalization1.12B
GTMAY vs IRCUF Comparison Chart in %
GTMAY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
IRCUF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GTMAY vs. IRCUF commentary
Feb 03, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GTMAY is a Hold and IRCUF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 03, 2026
Stock price -- (GTMAY: $1.70 vs. IRCUF: $7.48)
Brand notoriety: GTMAY and IRCUF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Marine Shipping industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GTMAY: 137% vs. IRCUF: 89%
Market capitalization -- GTMAY: $59.93M vs. IRCUF: $1.12B
GTMAY [@Marine Shipping] is valued at $59.93M. IRCUF’s [@Marine Shipping] market capitalization is $1.12B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Marine Shipping] industry ranges from $36.53B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Marine Shipping] industry is $5.28B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GTMAY’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileIRCUF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • GTMAY’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • IRCUF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, IRCUF is a better buy in the long-term than GTMAY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GTMAY’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while IRCUF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GTMAY’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • IRCUF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 1 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GTMAY is a better buy in the short-term than IRCUF.

Price Growth

GTMAY (@Marine Shipping) experienced а -0.06% price change this week, while IRCUF (@Marine Shipping) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Marine Shipping industry was +431.17%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.62%, and the average quarterly price growth was +21.27%.

Reported Earning Dates

GTMAY is expected to report earnings on Mar 03, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Marine Shipping (+431.17% weekly)

The marine shipping industry provides passenger transportation or cargo shipping services via waterways. This industry includes freight towage, ferry services and warehousing on deep-sea and inland waterways. The aviation sector may have reduced the popularity of sea travel for several passengers, but it is still in demand for short trips and pleasure cruises. Teekay Offshore Partners L.P. Cum Red Perp Pfd., Kirby Corporation and Seaspan Corporation are some of the well-known names in the business.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IRCUF($1.12B) has a higher market cap than GTMAY($59.9M). IRCUF has higher P/E ratio than GTMAY: IRCUF (16.19) vs GTMAY (3.46). GTMAY YTD gains are higher at: 25.926 vs. IRCUF (0.000). GTMAY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 506M vs. IRCUF (140M). GTMAY has more cash in the bank: 279M vs. IRCUF (17.8M). IRCUF has less debt than GTMAY: IRCUF (242M) vs GTMAY (1.33B). GTMAY has higher revenues than IRCUF: GTMAY (2.03B) vs IRCUF (628M).
GTMAYIRCUFGTMAY / IRCUF
Capitalization59.9M1.12B5%
EBITDA506M140M361%
Gain YTD25.9260.000-
P/E Ratio3.4616.1921%
Revenue2.03B628M324%
Total Cash279M17.8M1,567%
Total Debt1.33B242M548%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GTMAY vs IRCUF: Fundamental Ratings
GTMAY
IRCUF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9344
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
64
Fair valued
33
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5345
SMR RATING
1..100
5743
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3748
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9832
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5048

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

IRCUF's Valuation (33) in the null industry is in the same range as GTMAY (64). This means that IRCUF’s stock grew similarly to GTMAY’s over the last 12 months.

IRCUF's Profit vs Risk Rating (45) in the null industry is in the same range as GTMAY (53). This means that IRCUF’s stock grew similarly to GTMAY’s over the last 12 months.

IRCUF's SMR Rating (43) in the null industry is in the same range as GTMAY (57). This means that IRCUF’s stock grew similarly to GTMAY’s over the last 12 months.

GTMAY's Price Growth Rating (37) in the null industry is in the same range as IRCUF (48). This means that GTMAY’s stock grew similarly to IRCUF’s over the last 12 months.

IRCUF's P/E Growth Rating (32) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for GTMAY (98). This means that IRCUF’s stock grew significantly faster than GTMAY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GTMAYIRCUF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
31%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
43%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
38%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
52%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
29%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
22%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GTMAY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
IRCUF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SOPYX31.650.10
+0.32%
ClearBridge Dividend Strategy I
FMFCX94.00N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Materials C
FZAOX37.90N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Z
NWAVX14.24-0.05
-0.35%
Nationwide GQG US Quality Eq R6
LZFIX7.03-0.04
-0.57%
Lazard Equity Franchise Inst Shr

GTMAY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GTMAY and KAIKY have been poorly correlated (+13% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GTMAY and KAIKY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GTMAY
1D Price
Change %
GTMAY100%
N/A
KAIKY - GTMAY
13%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HPGLY - GTMAY
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IRCUF - GTMAY
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ICTEF - GTMAY
2%
Poorly correlated
+2.65%
HLAGF - GTMAY
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

IRCUF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IRCUF has been loosely correlated with SLOFF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if IRCUF jumps, then SLOFF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IRCUF
1D Price
Change %
IRCUF100%
N/A
SLOFF - IRCUF
35%
Loosely correlated
N/A
HLAGF - IRCUF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DLPTF - IRCUF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GTMAY - IRCUF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HHULY - IRCUF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More