Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GTLSX vs NLSIX
GTLSX vs NLSIX Comparison
Open Charts GTLSX vs NLSIX
Glenmede Long/Short Eq Ptf Instl Shrs
Price$12.97
Change-$0.02 (-0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets37.67M
Neuberger Berman Long Short Instl
Price$20.06
Change-$0.09 (-0.45%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.99B
GTLSX vs NLSIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GTLSX vs. NLSIX commentary
Jan 16, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GTLSX is a Hold and NLSIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSIX has more cash in the bank: 7.99B vs. GTLSX (37.7M). GTLSX pays higher dividends than NLSIX: GTLSX (1.63) vs NLSIX (0.05). GTLSX was incepted earlier than NLSIX: GTLSX (7 years) vs NLSIX (14 years). GTLSX (2.79) is less costly to investors than NLSIX (1.32). NLSIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. GTLSX (0.99). NLSIX has a lower initial minimum investment than GTLSX: NLSIX (1000000) vs GTLSX (10000000). NLSIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.81 vs. GTLSX (-2.76). NLSIX return over 5 years is better than : 24.11 vs. GTLSX (16.33).
| GTLSX | NLSIX | GTLSX / NLSIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.32 | 1.32 | 176% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.79 | 1.32 | 211% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.231 | -0.149 | 155% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000000 | 1000000 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 37.7M | 7.99B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.63 | 0.05 | 3,213% |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.76 | 6.81 | -40% |
| Returns for 3 years | -1.65 | 27.72 | -6% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.33 | 24.11 | 68% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 71.57 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement