Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GTLSX vs NLSCX
GTLSX vs NLSCX Comparison
Open Charts GTLSX vs NLSCX
Glenmede Long/Short Eq Ptf Instl Shrs
Price$13.17
Change-$0.10 (-0.75%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets38.76M
Neuberger Berman Long Short C
Price$18.55
Change-$0.07 (-0.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.12B
GTLSX vs NLSCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GTLSX vs. NLSCX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GTLSX is a Buy and NLSCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSCX has more cash in the bank: 8.12B vs. GTLSX (38.8M). GTLSX pays higher dividends than NLSCX: GTLSX (1.60) vs NLSCX (0.00). GTLSX was incepted earlier than NLSCX: GTLSX (7 years) vs NLSCX (14 years). GTLSX (2.79) is less costly to investors than NLSCX (2.43). GTLSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 109.00 vs. NLSCX (0.96). NLSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than GTLSX: NLSCX (1000) vs GTLSX (10000000). NLSCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.65 vs. GTLSX (-2.66). GTLSX return over 5 years is better than : 19.32 vs. NLSCX (14.66).
| GTLSX | NLSCX | GTLSX / NLSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.32 | 2.43 | 95% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.79 | 2.43 | 115% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.077 | -0.693 | -300% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000000 | 1000 | 1,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 38.8M | 8.12B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.60 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.66 | 2.65 | -100% |
| Returns for 3 years | 0.41 | 22.54 | 2% |
| Returns for 5 years | 19.32 | 14.66 | 132% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 52.68 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement