Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GTLSX vs NLSCX
GTLSX vs NLSCX Comparison
Open Charts GTLSX vs NLSCX
Glenmede Long/Short Eq Ptf Instl Shrs
Price$14.83
Change-$0.04 (-0.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets39.06M
Neuberger Berman Long Short C
Price$18.84
Change-$0.08 (-0.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.07B
GTLSX vs NLSCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GTLSX vs. NLSCX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GTLSX is a Buy and NLSCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSCX has more cash in the bank: 8.07B vs. GTLSX (39.1M). GTLSX pays higher dividends than NLSCX: GTLSX (1.34) vs NLSCX (0.00). GTLSX was incepted earlier than NLSCX: GTLSX (7 years) vs NLSCX (14 years). GTLSX (2.79) is less costly to investors than NLSCX (2.43). NLSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. GTLSX (0.99). NLSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than GTLSX: NLSCX (1000) vs GTLSX (10000000). NLSCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.07 vs. GTLSX (2.27). GTLSX return over 5 years is better than : 40.08 vs. NLSCX (16.58).
| GTLSX | NLSCX | GTLSX / NLSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.32 | 2.43 | 95% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.79 | 2.43 | 115% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.124 | 6.953 | 174% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000000 | 1000 | 1,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 39.1M | 8.07B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.34 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.27 | 7.07 | 32% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.61 | 19.29 | 71% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.08 | 16.58 | 242% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 47.75 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement