Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GTLSX vs NLSAX
GTLSX vs NLSAX Comparison
Open Charts GTLSX vs NLSAX
Glenmede Long/Short Eq Ptf Instl Shrs
Price$14.30
Change-$0.07 (-0.49%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets45.6M
Neuberger Berman Long Short A
Price$19.70
Change+$0.06 (+0.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.53B
GTLSX vs NLSAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GTLSX vs. NLSAX commentary
Sep 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GTLSX is a Buy and NLSAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSAX has more cash in the bank: 7.53B vs. GTLSX (45.6M). GTLSX pays higher dividends than NLSAX: GTLSX (1.71) vs NLSAX (0.00). GTLSX was incepted earlier than NLSAX: GTLSX (7 years) vs NLSAX (14 years). GTLSX (2.79) is less costly to investors than NLSAX (1.68). NLSAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. GTLSX (0.99). NLSAX has a lower initial minimum investment than GTLSX: NLSAX (1000) vs GTLSX (10000000). NLSAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.48 vs. GTLSX (3.65). GTLSX return over 5 years is better than : 37.78 vs. NLSAX (23.55).
| GTLSX | NLSAX | GTLSX / NLSAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.32 | 1.68 | 138% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.79 | 1.68 | 166% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.554 | 6.392 | 118% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000000 | 1000 | 1,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 45.6M | 7.53B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.71 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.65 | 9.48 | 39% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.69 | 19.24 | 66% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.78 | 23.55 | 160% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 54.65 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers