GTLS
Price
$200.27
Change
+$0.15 (+0.07%)
Updated
Oct 15, 11:16 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
8.99B
15 days until earnings call
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
PH
Price
$746.56
Change
+$10.08 (+1.37%)
Updated
Oct 15, 11:15 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
93.2B
21 days until earnings call
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

GTLS vs PH

Header iconGTLS vs PH Comparison
Open Charts GTLS vs PHBanner chart's image
Chart Industries
Price$200.27
Change+$0.15 (+0.07%)
Volume$221
Capitalization8.99B
Parker-Hannifin
Price$746.56
Change+$10.08 (+1.37%)
Volume$500
Capitalization93.2B
GTLS vs PH Comparison Chart in %
GTLS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GTLS vs. PH commentary
Oct 16, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GTLS is a Hold and PH is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 16, 2025
Stock price -- (GTLS: $200.12 vs. PH: $736.48)
Brand notoriety: GTLS and PH are both not notable
Both companies represent the Industrial Machinery industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GTLS: 61% vs. PH: 60%
Market capitalization -- GTLS: $8.99B vs. PH: $93.2B
GTLS [@Industrial Machinery] is valued at $8.99B. PH’s [@Industrial Machinery] market capitalization is $93.2B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Industrial Machinery] industry ranges from $223.62B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Industrial Machinery] industry is $14.68B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GTLS’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whilePH’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • GTLS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • PH’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, PH is a better buy in the long-term than GTLS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GTLS’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PH’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GTLS’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • PH’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PH is a better buy in the short-term than GTLS.

Price Growth

GTLS (@Industrial Machinery) experienced а -0.02% price change this week, while PH (@Industrial Machinery) price change was -1.89% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Industrial Machinery industry was +2.79%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.95%, and the average quarterly price growth was +40.30%.

Reported Earning Dates

GTLS is expected to report earnings on Oct 31, 2025.

PH is expected to report earnings on Nov 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Industrial Machinery (+2.79% weekly)

The industry makes and maintains machines for consumers, the industry, and most other companies. While it has traditionally been categorized as heavy industry, some smaller companies are also branching into the light category. The industry is pivotal in providing the equipment for production in businesses like agriculture, mining, industry and construction, gas, electricity and water utilities. It also supplies supporting equipment for almost all sectors of the economy, such as equipment for heating, and air conditioning of buildings. Illinois Tool Works Inc., Parker-Hannifin Corporation and Rockwell Automation Inc are some of the major U.S. companies operating in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PH($93.2B) has a higher market cap than GTLS($8.99B). GTLS has higher P/E ratio than PH: GTLS (36.79) vs PH (27.16). PH YTD gains are higher at: 16.670 vs. GTLS (4.863). PH has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 5.42B vs. GTLS (971M). PH has more cash in the bank: 467M vs. GTLS (342M). GTLS has less debt than PH: GTLS (3.67B) vs PH (9.29B). PH has higher revenues than GTLS: PH (19.9B) vs GTLS (4.25B).
GTLSPHGTLS / PH
Capitalization8.99B93.2B10%
EBITDA971M5.42B18%
Gain YTD4.86316.67029%
P/E Ratio36.7927.16135%
Revenue4.25B19.9B21%
Total Cash342M467M73%
Total Debt3.67B9.29B39%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GTLS vs PH: Fundamental Ratings
GTLS
PH
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1611
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
75
Overvalued
87
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4611
SMR RATING
1..100
7735
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4250
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4858
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

GTLS's Valuation (75) in the Industrial Machinery industry is in the same range as PH (87). This means that GTLS’s stock grew similarly to PH’s over the last 12 months.

PH's Profit vs Risk Rating (11) in the Industrial Machinery industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GTLS (46). This means that PH’s stock grew somewhat faster than GTLS’s over the last 12 months.

PH's SMR Rating (35) in the Industrial Machinery industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GTLS (77). This means that PH’s stock grew somewhat faster than GTLS’s over the last 12 months.

GTLS's Price Growth Rating (42) in the Industrial Machinery industry is in the same range as PH (50). This means that GTLS’s stock grew similarly to PH’s over the last 12 months.

GTLS's P/E Growth Rating (48) in the Industrial Machinery industry is in the same range as PH (58). This means that GTLS’s stock grew similarly to PH’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GTLSPH
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
54%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
39%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
54%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 28 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
47%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
55%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GTLS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
EPRF18.090.08
+0.44%
Innovator S&P Investment Grade Prfrd ETF
AGG100.780.16
+0.16%
iShares Core US Aggregate Bond ETF
UYLD51.240.01
+0.03%
Angel Oak UltraShort Income ETF
PBP22.20-0.07
-0.31%
Invesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF
UNL7.57-0.11
-1.50%
United States 12 Month Natural Gas

GTLS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GTLS has been closely correlated with FLS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GTLS jumps, then FLS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GTLS
1D Price
Change %
GTLS100%
+0.04%
FLS - GTLS
78%
Closely correlated
+2.09%
PH - GTLS
67%
Closely correlated
+1.07%
ETN - GTLS
63%
Loosely correlated
-0.27%
DOV - GTLS
63%
Loosely correlated
+0.86%
GRC - GTLS
62%
Loosely correlated
+0.96%
More