GTLS
Price
$204.96
Change
+$0.75 (+0.37%)
Updated
Dec 3 closing price
Capitalization
9.21B
85 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
PH
Price
$869.20
Change
+$10.26 (+1.19%)
Updated
Dec 3 closing price
Capitalization
109.68B
56 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

GTLS vs PH

Header iconGTLS vs PH Comparison
Open Charts GTLS vs PHBanner chart's image
Chart Industries
Price$204.96
Change+$0.75 (+0.37%)
Volume$518.41K
Capitalization9.21B
Parker-Hannifin
Price$869.20
Change+$10.26 (+1.19%)
Volume$456.52K
Capitalization109.68B
GTLS vs PH Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GTLS vs. PH commentary
Dec 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GTLS is a StrongBuy and PH is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 04, 2025
Stock price -- (GTLS: $204.40 vs. PH: $858.97)
Brand notoriety: GTLS and PH are both not notable
Both companies represent the Industrial Machinery industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GTLS: 21% vs. PH: 16%
Market capitalization -- GTLS: $9.21B vs. PH: $109.68B
GTLS [@Industrial Machinery] is valued at $9.21B. PH’s [@Industrial Machinery] market capitalization is $109.68B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Industrial Machinery] industry ranges from $206.99B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Industrial Machinery] industry is $14.49B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GTLS’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePH’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • GTLS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • PH’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both GTLS and PH are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GTLS’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PH’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GTLS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • PH’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PH is a better buy in the short-term than GTLS.

Price Growth

GTLS (@Industrial Machinery) experienced а +0.24% price change this week, while PH (@Industrial Machinery) price change was +0.81% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Industrial Machinery industry was +0.29%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.76%, and the average quarterly price growth was +16.99%.

Reported Earning Dates

GTLS is expected to report earnings on Feb 27, 2026.

PH is expected to report earnings on Jan 29, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Industrial Machinery (+0.29% weekly)

The industry makes and maintains machines for consumers, the industry, and most other companies. While it has traditionally been categorized as heavy industry, some smaller companies are also branching into the light category. The industry is pivotal in providing the equipment for production in businesses like agriculture, mining, industry and construction, gas, electricity and water utilities. It also supplies supporting equipment for almost all sectors of the economy, such as equipment for heating, and air conditioning of buildings. Illinois Tool Works Inc., Parker-Hannifin Corporation and Rockwell Automation Inc are some of the major U.S. companies operating in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PH($110B) has a higher market cap than GTLS($9.21B). GTLS has higher P/E ratio than PH: GTLS (232.91) vs PH (30.97). PH YTD gains are higher at: 36.369 vs. GTLS (7.103). PH has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 5.58B vs. GTLS (971M). GTLS has less debt than PH: GTLS (3.67B) vs PH (9.29B). PH has higher revenues than GTLS: PH (20B) vs GTLS (4.25B).
GTLSPHGTLS / PH
Capitalization9.21B110B8%
EBITDA971M5.58B17%
Gain YTD7.10336.36920%
P/E Ratio232.9130.97752%
Revenue4.25B20B21%
Total Cash342MN/A-
Total Debt3.67B9.29B39%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GTLS vs PH: Fundamental Ratings
GTLS
PH
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
91
Overvalued
93
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
507
SMR RATING
1..100
7694
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4814
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
345
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a16

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

GTLS's Valuation (91) in the Industrial Machinery industry is in the same range as PH (93). This means that GTLS’s stock grew similarly to PH’s over the last 12 months.

PH's Profit vs Risk Rating (7) in the Industrial Machinery industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GTLS (50). This means that PH’s stock grew somewhat faster than GTLS’s over the last 12 months.

GTLS's SMR Rating (76) in the Industrial Machinery industry is in the same range as PH (94). This means that GTLS’s stock grew similarly to PH’s over the last 12 months.

PH's Price Growth Rating (14) in the Industrial Machinery industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GTLS (48). This means that PH’s stock grew somewhat faster than GTLS’s over the last 12 months.

GTLS's P/E Growth Rating (3) in the Industrial Machinery industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PH (45). This means that GTLS’s stock grew somewhat faster than PH’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GTLSPH
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
34%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
53%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
62%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
59%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
65%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
64%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
65%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
47%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
43%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
63%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GTLS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
PH
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RMIF24.910.04
+0.14%
LHA Risk-Managed Income ETF
MYCK25.130.02
+0.10%
SPDR SSGA My2031 Corporate Bond ETF
CARY20.91N/A
N/A
Angel Oak Income ETF
HSCZ38.71-0.02
-0.06%
iShares Currency Hdgd MSCI EAFE SmCp ETF
PHYS32.21-0.23
-0.71%
Sprott Physical Gold Trust

GTLS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GTLS has been loosely correlated with PH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GTLS jumps, then PH could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GTLS
1D Price
Change %
GTLS100%
+0.17%
PH - GTLS
63%
Loosely correlated
+0.33%
GRC - GTLS
62%
Loosely correlated
N/A
GHM - GTLS
61%
Loosely correlated
+2.32%
ETN - GTLS
60%
Loosely correlated
-1.97%
FLS - GTLS
59%
Loosely correlated
-1.28%
More

PH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PH has been closely correlated with DOV. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PH jumps, then DOV could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PH
1D Price
Change %
PH100%
+0.33%
DOV - PH
85%
Closely correlated
+1.43%
EMR - PH
82%
Closely correlated
-0.03%
PNR - PH
77%
Closely correlated
+0.09%
ITT - PH
76%
Closely correlated
-1.50%
IR - PH
75%
Closely correlated
N/A
More