Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GTLLX vs RGAGX
GTLLX vs RGAGX Comparison
Open Charts GTLLX vs RGAGX
Glenmede Disciplined US Growth Eq Ptf
Price$29.26
Change-$0.08 (-0.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.24B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R6
Price$85.36
Change-$0.06 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets329.22B
GTLLX vs RGAGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GTLLX vs. RGAGX commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GTLLX is a Buy and RGAGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAGX has more cash in the bank: 329B vs. GTLLX (1.24B). RGAGX pays higher dividends than GTLLX: RGAGX (0.60) vs GTLLX (0.00). GTLLX was incepted earlier than RGAGX: GTLLX (21 years) vs RGAGX (16 years). GTLLX (0.86) is less costly to investors than RGAGX (0.30). GTLLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. RGAGX (25.00). GTLLX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGAGX: GTLLX (0) vs RGAGX (250). RGAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.11 vs. GTLLX (-16.16). RGAGX return over 5 years is better than : 46.14 vs. GTLLX (-11.64).
| GTLLX | RGAGX | GTLLX / RGAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 0.30 | 287% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 0.30 | 287% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.895 | 14.500 | 61% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.24B | 329B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.60 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -16.16 | 15.11 | -107% |
| Returns for 3 years | -4.16 | 43.78 | -10% |
| Returns for 5 years | -11.64 | 46.14 | -25% |
| Returns for 10 years | 22.65 | 90.14 | 25% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement