GTLB
Price
$48.84
Change
-$0.64 (-1.29%)
Updated
Sep 23 closing price
Capitalization
8.15B
75 days until earnings call
TEAM
Price
$165.65
Change
-$4.98 (-2.92%)
Updated
Sep 23, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
43.46B
37 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

GTLB vs TEAM

Header iconGTLB vs TEAM Comparison
Open Charts GTLB vs TEAMBanner chart's image
GitLab
Price$48.84
Change-$0.64 (-1.29%)
Volume$3.28M
Capitalization8.15B
Atlassian
Price$165.65
Change-$4.98 (-2.92%)
Volume$36.31K
Capitalization43.46B
GTLB vs TEAM Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
GTLB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TEAM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GTLB vs. TEAM commentary
Sep 24, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GTLB is a StrongBuy and TEAM is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 24, 2025
Stock price -- (GTLB: $49.48 vs. TEAM: $165.68)
Brand notoriety: GTLB: Not notable vs. TEAM: Notable
GTLB represents the Computer Communications, while TEAM is part of the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GTLB: 59% vs. TEAM: 114%
Market capitalization -- GTLB: $8.15B vs. TEAM: $43.46B
GTLB [@Computer Communications] is valued at $8.15B. TEAM’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $43.46B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Computer Communications] industry ranges from $3.79T to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $311.01B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Computer Communications] industry is $27.85B. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $9.06B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GTLB’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileTEAM’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • GTLB’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • TEAM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, GTLB is a better buy in the long-term than TEAM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GTLB’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TEAM’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GTLB’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • TEAM’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GTLB is a better buy in the short-term than TEAM.

Price Growth

GTLB (@Computer Communications) experienced а -1.22% price change this week, while TEAM (@Packaged Software) price change was -3.70% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Communications industry was +2.49%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.07%, and the average quarterly price growth was +74.53%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +4.29%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.46%, and the average quarterly price growth was +187.66%.

Reported Earning Dates

GTLB is expected to report earnings on Dec 08, 2025.

TEAM is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Computer Communications (+2.49% weekly)

Computer communications industry develops technology that allows computing devices to exchange data with each other using connections/data links between nodes. Common types of computer network include Cloud (IAN), Internet, Wide (WAN, Local (LAN)/Wireless(WLAN) etc. The industry is an ever-more important part of technology, and is set to become even bigger as the Internet of Things (IoT) rapidly forays into the various aspects of our lives. Cisco Systems, Inc., Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Arista Networks, Inc., Fortinet, Inc. are some of the major computer communications companies.

@Packaged Software (+4.29% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TEAM($43.5B) has a higher market cap than GTLB($8.15B). GTLB YTD gains are higher at: -13.327 vs. TEAM (-29.892). TEAM has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 24M vs. GTLB (-89.8M). TEAM has more cash in the bank: 2.94B vs. GTLB (1.17B). GTLB has less debt than TEAM: GTLB (392K) vs TEAM (1.24B). TEAM has higher revenues than GTLB: TEAM (5.22B) vs GTLB (858M).
GTLBTEAMGTLB / TEAM
Capitalization8.15B43.5B19%
EBITDA-89.8M24M-374%
Gain YTD-13.327-29.89245%
P/E Ratio521.22N/A-
Revenue858M5.22B16%
Total Cash1.17B2.94B40%
Total Debt392K1.24B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
TEAM: Fundamental Ratings
TEAM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
65
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
97
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
98
SMR RATING
1..100
96
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
62
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
15
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GTLBTEAM
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
60%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
78%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 20 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
74%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GTLB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TEAM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
XPND36.750.25
+0.70%
First Trust Expanded Technology ETF
SCHV29.090.04
+0.14%
Schwab US Large-Cap Value ETF™
TEAF11.800.01
+0.08%
Ecofin Sustainable and Social Impact Term Fund
IAT52.84-0.88
-1.64%
iShares US Regional Banks ETF
PTIR31.45-1.07
-3.29%
GraniteShares 2x Long PLTR Daily ETF

GTLB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GTLB has been loosely correlated with PATH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GTLB jumps, then PATH could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GTLB
1D Price
Change %
GTLB100%
-1.29%
PATH - GTLB
64%
Loosely correlated
-4.64%
ZS - GTLB
61%
Loosely correlated
-0.78%
HUBS - GTLB
61%
Loosely correlated
-1.88%
TEAM - GTLB
60%
Loosely correlated
-2.90%
MDB - GTLB
59%
Loosely correlated
-1.43%
More

TEAM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TEAM has been closely correlated with HUBS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TEAM jumps, then HUBS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TEAM
1D Price
Change %
TEAM100%
+0.93%
HUBS - TEAM
71%
Closely correlated
+0.80%
NOW - TEAM
66%
Closely correlated
-1.39%
CRM - TEAM
64%
Loosely correlated
+1.05%
DT - TEAM
64%
Loosely correlated
+0.48%
ESTC - TEAM
63%
Loosely correlated
-0.13%
More