GTLB
Price
$48.02
Change
-$1.01 (-2.06%)
Updated
Aug 29 closing price
Capitalization
7.93B
2 days until earnings call
TEAM
Price
$177.78
Change
+$1.00 (+0.57%)
Updated
Aug 29 closing price
Capitalization
46.64B
59 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

GTLB vs TEAM

Header iconGTLB vs TEAM Comparison
Open Charts GTLB vs TEAMBanner chart's image
GitLab
Price$48.02
Change-$1.01 (-2.06%)
Volume$4.99M
Capitalization7.93B
Atlassian
Price$177.78
Change+$1.00 (+0.57%)
Volume$2.89M
Capitalization46.64B
GTLB vs TEAM Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
GTLB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TEAM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GTLB vs. TEAM commentary
Sep 02, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GTLB is a StrongBuy and TEAM is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 02, 2025
Stock price -- (GTLB: $48.02 vs. TEAM: $177.78)
Brand notoriety: GTLB: Not notable vs. TEAM: Notable
GTLB represents the Computer Communications, while TEAM is part of the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GTLB: 119% vs. TEAM: 118%
Market capitalization -- GTLB: $7.93B vs. TEAM: $46.64B
GTLB [@Computer Communications] is valued at $7.93B. TEAM’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $46.64B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Computer Communications] industry ranges from $3.77T to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $320.59B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Computer Communications] industry is $26.15B. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $9.09B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GTLB’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileTEAM’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • GTLB’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • TEAM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both GTLB and TEAM are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GTLB’s TA Score shows that 7 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TEAM’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GTLB’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • TEAM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GTLB is a better buy in the short-term than TEAM.

Price Growth

GTLB (@Computer Communications) experienced а +6.29% price change this week, while TEAM (@Packaged Software) price change was +4.09% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Communications industry was +0.17%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.11%, and the average quarterly price growth was +42.00%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -0.62%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.22%, and the average quarterly price growth was +22.70%.

Reported Earning Dates

GTLB is expected to report earnings on Sep 03, 2025.

TEAM is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Computer Communications (+0.17% weekly)

Computer communications industry develops technology that allows computing devices to exchange data with each other using connections/data links between nodes. Common types of computer network include Cloud (IAN), Internet, Wide (WAN, Local (LAN)/Wireless(WLAN) etc. The industry is an ever-more important part of technology, and is set to become even bigger as the Internet of Things (IoT) rapidly forays into the various aspects of our lives. Cisco Systems, Inc., Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Arista Networks, Inc., Fortinet, Inc. are some of the major computer communications companies.

@Packaged Software (-0.62% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TEAM($46.6B) has a higher market cap than GTLB($7.93B). GTLB YTD gains are higher at: -14.783 vs. TEAM (-26.954). TEAM has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 24M vs. GTLB (-112.15M). TEAM has more cash in the bank: 2.94B vs. GTLB (1.11B). GTLB has less debt than TEAM: GTLB (392K) vs TEAM (1.24B). TEAM has higher revenues than GTLB: TEAM (5.22B) vs GTLB (805M).
GTLBTEAMGTLB / TEAM
Capitalization7.93B46.6B17%
EBITDA-112.15M24M-467%
Gain YTD-14.783-26.95455%
P/E Ratio533.56N/A-
Revenue805M5.22B15%
Total Cash1.11B2.94B38%
Total Debt392K1.24B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
TEAM: Fundamental Ratings
TEAM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
98
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
96
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
64
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
16
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GTLBTEAM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
88%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
84%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
80%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
75%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
74%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
61%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
74%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GTLB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TEAM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NVDS12.380.58
+4.92%
Tradr 1.5X Short NVDA Daily ETF
EFU10.380.13
+1.30%
ProShares UltraShort MSCI EAFE
FTXO35.920.05
+0.15%
First Trust Nasdaq Bank ETF
CPSN26.40N/A
N/A
Calamos S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF - November
CGW64.22-0.43
-0.67%
Invesco S&P Global Water ETF

GTLB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GTLB has been loosely correlated with PATH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GTLB jumps, then PATH could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GTLB
1D Price
Change %
GTLB100%
-2.05%
PATH - GTLB
61%
Loosely correlated
-1.24%
HUBS - GTLB
61%
Loosely correlated
+1.43%
TEAM - GTLB
60%
Loosely correlated
+0.57%
MDB - GTLB
56%
Loosely correlated
-0.78%
FRSH - GTLB
56%
Loosely correlated
-0.44%
More

TEAM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TEAM has been closely correlated with HUBS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TEAM jumps, then HUBS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TEAM
1D Price
Change %
TEAM100%
+0.57%
HUBS - TEAM
71%
Closely correlated
+1.43%
NOW - TEAM
67%
Closely correlated
-1.20%
CRM - TEAM
65%
Loosely correlated
+0.68%
DT - TEAM
64%
Loosely correlated
-0.57%
GTLB - TEAM
60%
Loosely correlated
-2.05%
More