GTLB
Price
$45.73
Change
+$2.27 (+5.22%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
7.63B
93 days until earnings call
RWCRF
Price
$0.33
Change
-$0.07 (-17.50%)
Updated
Aug 28 closing price
Capitalization
5.74M
Interact to see
Advertisement

GTLB vs RWCRF

Header iconGTLB vs RWCRF Comparison
Open Charts GTLB vs RWCRFBanner chart's image
GitLab
Price$45.73
Change+$2.27 (+5.22%)
Volume$7.98M
Capitalization7.63B
RIWI
Price$0.33
Change-$0.07 (-17.50%)
Volume$2.2K
Capitalization5.74M
GTLB vs RWCRF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
GTLB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RWCRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GTLB vs. RWCRF commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GTLB is a Buy and RWCRF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (GTLB: $45.73 vs. RWCRF: $0.33)
Brand notoriety: GTLB and RWCRF are both not notable
GTLB represents the Computer Communications, while RWCRF is part of the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GTLB: 171% vs. RWCRF: 347%
Market capitalization -- GTLB: $7.63B vs. RWCRF: $5.74M
GTLB [@Computer Communications] is valued at $7.63B. RWCRF’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $5.74M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Computer Communications] industry ranges from $3.68T to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $316.66B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Computer Communications] industry is $25.76B. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $8.99B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GTLB’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileRWCRF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • GTLB’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • RWCRF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both GTLB and RWCRF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GTLB’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RWCRF’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GTLB’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • RWCRF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GTLB is a better buy in the short-term than RWCRF.

Price Growth

GTLB (@Computer Communications) experienced а -4.77% price change this week, while RWCRF (@Packaged Software) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Communications industry was +1.14%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.01%, and the average quarterly price growth was +46.61%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -1.74%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.35%, and the average quarterly price growth was +23.00%.

Reported Earning Dates

GTLB is expected to report earnings on Dec 08, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Computer Communications (+1.14% weekly)

Computer communications industry develops technology that allows computing devices to exchange data with each other using connections/data links between nodes. Common types of computer network include Cloud (IAN), Internet, Wide (WAN, Local (LAN)/Wireless(WLAN) etc. The industry is an ever-more important part of technology, and is set to become even bigger as the Internet of Things (IoT) rapidly forays into the various aspects of our lives. Cisco Systems, Inc., Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Arista Networks, Inc., Fortinet, Inc. are some of the major computer communications companies.

@Packaged Software (-1.74% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GTLB($7.63B) has a higher market cap than RWCRF($5.74M). RWCRF YTD gains are higher at: -15.313 vs. GTLB (-18.846). RWCRF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -849.59K vs. GTLB (-112.15M). GTLB has more cash in the bank: 1.11B vs. RWCRF (848K). GTLB has less debt than RWCRF: GTLB (392K) vs RWCRF (1.01M). GTLB has higher revenues than RWCRF: GTLB (805M) vs RWCRF (5.57M).
GTLBRWCRFGTLB / RWCRF
Capitalization7.63B5.74M132,805%
EBITDA-112.15M-849.59K13,200%
Gain YTD-18.846-15.313123%
P/E Ratio521.22N/A-
Revenue805M5.57M14,450%
Total Cash1.11B848K130,307%
Total Debt392K1.01M39%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
RWCRF: Fundamental Ratings
RWCRF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
92
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
100
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
98
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
87
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
51
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GTLBRWCRF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
79%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GTLB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RWCRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
STEP61.651.62
+2.69%
StepStone Group
ISTR23.380.28
+1.23%
Investar Holding Corp
HLT278.063.06
+1.11%
Hilton Worldwide Holdings
CVKD12.51-0.36
-2.80%
Cadrenal Therapeutics Inc
SION23.06-1.49
-6.07%
Sionna Therapeutics Inc

GTLB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GTLB has been loosely correlated with PATH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GTLB jumps, then PATH could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GTLB
1D Price
Change %
GTLB100%
+5.22%
PATH - GTLB
61%
Loosely correlated
+5.90%
HUBS - GTLB
61%
Loosely correlated
+5.00%
TEAM - GTLB
60%
Loosely correlated
+2.59%
FRSH - GTLB
56%
Loosely correlated
-1.31%
MNDY - GTLB
55%
Loosely correlated
+1.81%
More

RWCRF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that RWCRF and NAHD have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RWCRF and NAHD's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RWCRF
1D Price
Change %
RWCRF100%
N/A
NAHD - RWCRF
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PLTK - RWCRF
24%
Poorly correlated
+3.33%
NEMTF - RWCRF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SNTMF - RWCRF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GTLB - RWCRF
10%
Poorly correlated
-7.35%
More