GTLB
Price
$32.54
Change
-$0.30 (-0.91%)
Updated
Feb 4 closing price
Capitalization
5.48B
39 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
PATH
Price
$12.33
Change
+$0.18 (+1.48%)
Updated
Feb 4 closing price
Capitalization
6.59B
41 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

GTLB vs PATH

Header iconGTLB vs PATH Comparison
Open Charts GTLB vs PATHBanner chart's image
GitLab
Price$32.54
Change-$0.30 (-0.91%)
Volume$4.23M
Capitalization5.48B
UiPath
Price$12.33
Change+$0.18 (+1.48%)
Volume$42.47M
Capitalization6.59B
GTLB vs PATH Comparison Chart in %
GTLB
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
PATH
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GTLB vs. PATH commentary
Feb 05, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GTLB is a Hold and PATH is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 05, 2026
Stock price -- (GTLB: $32.54 vs. PATH: $12.33)
Brand notoriety: GTLB and PATH are both not notable
Both companies represent the Computer Communications industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GTLB: 83% vs. PATH: 149%
Market capitalization -- GTLB: $5.48B vs. PATH: $6.59B
GTLB [@Computer Communications] is valued at $5.48B. PATH’s [@Computer Communications] market capitalization is $6.59B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Computer Communications] industry ranges from $3.08T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Computer Communications] industry is $21.51B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GTLB’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whilePATH’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • GTLB’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • PATH’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, GTLB is a better buy in the long-term than PATH.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GTLB’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PATH’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GTLB’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • PATH’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GTLB is a better buy in the short-term than PATH.

Price Growth

GTLB (@Computer Communications) experienced а -12.59% price change this week, while PATH (@Computer Communications) price change was -12.62% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Communications industry was -6.88%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.89%, and the average quarterly price growth was -0.73%.

Reported Earning Dates

GTLB is expected to report earnings on Mar 16, 2026.

PATH is expected to report earnings on Mar 18, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Computer Communications (-6.88% weekly)

Computer communications industry develops technology that allows computing devices to exchange data with each other using connections/data links between nodes. Common types of computer network include Cloud (IAN), Internet, Wide (WAN, Local (LAN)/Wireless(WLAN) etc. The industry is an ever-more important part of technology, and is set to become even bigger as the Internet of Things (IoT) rapidly forays into the various aspects of our lives. Cisco Systems, Inc., Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Arista Networks, Inc., Fortinet, Inc. are some of the major computer communications companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PATH($6.59B) has a higher market cap than GTLB($5.48B). GTLB has higher P/E ratio than PATH: GTLB (521.22) vs PATH (29.36). GTLB YTD gains are higher at: -13.296 vs. PATH (-24.771). PATH has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 25.3M vs. GTLB (-73.73M). PATH has more cash in the bank: 1.4B vs. GTLB (1.2B). GTLB has less debt than PATH: GTLB (392K) vs PATH (82M). PATH has higher revenues than GTLB: PATH (1.55B) vs GTLB (906M).
GTLBPATHGTLB / PATH
Capitalization5.48B6.59B83%
EBITDA-73.73M25.3M-291%
Gain YTD-13.296-24.77154%
P/E Ratio521.2229.361,775%
Revenue906M1.55B58%
Total Cash1.2B1.4B86%
Total Debt392K82M0%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GTLBPATH
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 30 days ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
78%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GTLB
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
PATH
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IRGTX10.690.10
+0.94%
VY® CBRE Global Real Estate S
USAGX55.000.15
+0.27%
Victory Precious Metals and Minerals
TSWIX26.490.06
+0.23%
Transamerica International Equity I
ABVYX19.690.04
+0.20%
AB Large Cap Value Advisor
RNPHX70.54-0.39
-0.55%
American Funds New Perspective R5E

GTLB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GTLB has been closely correlated with ZS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GTLB jumps, then ZS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GTLB
1D Price
Change %
GTLB100%
-0.91%
ZS - GTLB
74%
Closely correlated
-1.20%
TENB - GTLB
72%
Closely correlated
-1.65%
IOT - GTLB
71%
Closely correlated
-4.96%
PATH - GTLB
69%
Closely correlated
+1.48%
NTNX - GTLB
69%
Closely correlated
+6.21%
More

PATH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PATH has been closely correlated with ZS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PATH jumps, then ZS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PATH
1D Price
Change %
PATH100%
+1.48%
ZS - PATH
74%
Closely correlated
-1.20%
RPD - PATH
73%
Closely correlated
+3.56%
VRNS - PATH
70%
Closely correlated
-10.78%
TENB - PATH
70%
Closely correlated
-1.65%
OSPN - PATH
69%
Closely correlated
-0.80%
More