GTLB
Price
$36.18
Change
+$0.33 (+0.92%)
Updated
Jan 14, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
6.04B
61 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
NOW
Price
$134.60
Change
-$3.59 (-2.60%)
Updated
Jan 14, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
145.81B
14 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

GTLB vs NOW

Header iconGTLB vs NOW Comparison
Open Charts GTLB vs NOWBanner chart's image
GitLab
Price$36.18
Change+$0.33 (+0.92%)
Volume$132.96K
Capitalization6.04B
ServiceNow
Price$134.60
Change-$3.59 (-2.60%)
Volume$87.42K
Capitalization145.81B
GTLB vs NOW Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GTLB vs. NOW commentary
Jan 15, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GTLB is a Hold and NOW is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 15, 2026
Stock price -- (GTLB: $35.85 vs. NOW: $138.19)
Brand notoriety: GTLB: Not notable vs. NOW: Notable
GTLB represents the Computer Communications, while NOW is part of the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GTLB: 127% vs. NOW: 147%
Market capitalization -- GTLB: $6.04B vs. NOW: $145.81B
GTLB [@Computer Communications] is valued at $6.04B. NOW’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $145.81B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Computer Communications] industry ranges from $3.5T to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $289.53B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Computer Communications] industry is $25.51B. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $8.11B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GTLB’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileNOW’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • GTLB’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • NOW’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, GTLB is a better buy in the long-term than NOW.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GTLB’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NOW’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GTLB’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • NOW’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GTLB is a better buy in the short-term than NOW.

Price Growth

GTLB (@Computer Communications) experienced а -2.42% price change this week, while NOW (@Packaged Software) price change was -7.14% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Communications industry was -0.18%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.54%, and the average quarterly price growth was -2.30%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -1.61%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.76%, and the average quarterly price growth was +69.23%.

Reported Earning Dates

GTLB is expected to report earnings on Mar 16, 2026.

NOW is expected to report earnings on Jan 28, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Computer Communications (-0.18% weekly)

Computer communications industry develops technology that allows computing devices to exchange data with each other using connections/data links between nodes. Common types of computer network include Cloud (IAN), Internet, Wide (WAN, Local (LAN)/Wireless(WLAN) etc. The industry is an ever-more important part of technology, and is set to become even bigger as the Internet of Things (IoT) rapidly forays into the various aspects of our lives. Cisco Systems, Inc., Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Arista Networks, Inc., Fortinet, Inc. are some of the major computer communications companies.

@Packaged Software (-1.61% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NOW($146B) has a higher market cap than GTLB($6.04B). GTLB has higher P/E ratio than NOW: GTLB (521.22) vs NOW (83.55). GTLB YTD gains are higher at: -4.476 vs. NOW (-9.792). NOW has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.89B vs. GTLB (-73.73M). GTLB has less debt than NOW: GTLB (392K) vs NOW (2.4B). NOW has higher revenues than GTLB: NOW (12.7B) vs GTLB (906M).
GTLBNOWGTLB / NOW
Capitalization6.04B146B4%
EBITDA-73.73M2.89B-3%
Gain YTD-4.476-9.79246%
P/E Ratio521.2283.55624%
Revenue906M12.7B7%
Total Cash1.2BN/A-
Total Debt392K2.4B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NOW: Fundamental Ratings
NOW
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
73
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
82
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
75
SMR RATING
1..100
51
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
65
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
94
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GTLBNOW
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
71%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
65%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GTLB
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
NOW
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CTEC59.170.38
+0.64%
Global X CleanTech ETF
BHK9.67N/A
N/A
Blackrock Core BD TR
FNDF46.66-0.18
-0.38%
Schwab Fundamental International Eq ETF
SDG84.81-0.55
-0.64%
iShares MSCI Global Sust Dev Goals ETF
AGIX37.06-0.24
-0.64%
KraneShares Artfcl Intllgnc and Tech ETF

GTLB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GTLB has been loosely correlated with HUBS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 60% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GTLB jumps, then HUBS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GTLB
1D Price
Change %
GTLB100%
+0.53%
HUBS - GTLB
60%
Loosely correlated
-4.54%
TEAM - GTLB
59%
Loosely correlated
-5.84%
COIN - GTLB
59%
Loosely correlated
+4.00%
FRSH - GTLB
56%
Loosely correlated
-3.39%
NOW - GTLB
56%
Loosely correlated
-3.12%
More

NOW and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NOW has been closely correlated with CRM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if NOW jumps, then CRM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NOW
1D Price
Change %
NOW100%
-3.12%
CRM - NOW
73%
Closely correlated
-7.07%
CRWD - NOW
68%
Closely correlated
+0.22%
MSFT - NOW
67%
Closely correlated
-1.36%
FRSH - NOW
65%
Loosely correlated
-3.39%
DT - NOW
64%
Loosely correlated
-2.17%
More